Overview 221 matches · 50 in Waratek scope · 9 protected · 15 exploited · 9 CISA KEV · 18 public PoC · 11 EPSS ≥ 0.5
221matches
50in Waratek scope22.6%
9protected4.1%
15exploited6.8%
9CISA KEV4.1%
18public PoC8.1%
11EPSS ≥ 0.55.0%
Protected by Waratek
9
4.1%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
5
2.3%
No exploit published
36
16.3%
Outside Waratek scope
1
0.5%
Not applicable
170
76.9%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
9
4.1%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
212
95.9%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 68 / year
20091
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20101
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20110
20120
20130
20140
20150
20160
20171
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20183
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published1
Not applicable1
Critical2
High1
not blocked3
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit2
201963
Not applicable63
Critical6
High57
not blocked63
Exploited1
Forecast only1
No public exploit61
202068
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published2
Not applicable64
Critical40
High28
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked66
Exploited2
Working exploit published2
No public exploit64
20217
Protected by Waratek3
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable3
Critical5
High1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked4
Exploited4
No public exploit3
202211
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published1
Not applicable5
Critical6
High3
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked8
Exploited5
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit4
202311
No exploit published6
Not applicable5
Critical4
High4
Medium3
not blocked11
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit10
20248
No exploit published1
Not applicable7
Critical4
Medium4
not blocked8
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit6
20254
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published2
Not applicable1
Critical2
High1
Medium1
not blocked4
Exploited1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit2
202643
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published21
Not applicable21
Critical16
High20
Medium7
not blocked43
Exploited1
Proof of concept only8
No public exploit34
201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-11959 | High | 2019-06-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) PLAT earlier than version 7.3 E0506P09. |
| CVE-2019-11958 | High | 2019-06-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) PLAT earlier than version 7.3 E0506P09. |
| CVE-2019-11955 | High | 2019-06-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) PLAT earlier than version 7.3 E0506P09. |
| CVE-2019-11954 | High | 2019-06-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) PLAT earlier than version 7.3 E0506P09. |
| CVE-2019-11953 | High | 2019-06-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) PLAT earlier than version 7.3 E0506P09. |
| CVE-2019-11952 | High | 2019-06-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) PLAT earlier than version 7.3 E0506P09. |
| CVE-2019-11951 | High | 2019-06-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) PLAT earlier than version 7.3 E0506P09. |
| CVE-2019-11949 | Critical | 2019-06-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) PLAT earlier than version 7.3 E0506P09. |
| CVE-2019-11948 | High | 2019-06-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) PLAT earlier than version 7.3 E0506P09. |
| CVE-2019-11943 | High | 2019-06-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) PLAT earlier than version 7.3 E0506P09. |
| CVE-2019-11942 | High | 2019-06-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) PLAT earlier than version 7.3 E0506P09. |
| CVE-2019-11628 | High | 2019-05-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in QlikView Server before 11.20 SR19, 12.00 and 12.10 before 12.10 SR11, 12.20 before SR9, and 12.30 before SR2; and Qlik Sense Enterprise and Qlik Analytics Platform installations that lack these patch levels: February 2018 Patch 4, April 2018 Patch 3, June 2018 Patch 3, September 2018 Patch 4, November 2018 Patch 4, or February 2019 Patch 2. An authenticated user may be able to bypass intended file-read restrictions via crafted Browser requests. |
| CVE-2019-9041 | High | 2019-02-23 | Not applicable | Exploited | An issue was discovered in ZZZCMS zzzphp V1.6.1. In the inc/zzz_template.php file, the parserIfLabel() function's filtering is not strict, resulting in PHP code execution, as demonstrated by the if:assert substring. |
| CVE-2019-5916 | Critical | 2019-02-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Input validation issue in POWER EGG(Ver 2.0.1, Ver 2.02 Patch 3 and earlier, Ver 2.1 Patch 4 and earlier, Ver 2.2 Patch 7 and earlier, Ver 2.3 Patch 9 and earlier, Ver 2.4 Patch 13 and earlier, Ver 2.5 Patch 12 and earlier, Ver 2.6 Patch 8 and earlier, Ver 2.7 Patch 6 and earlier, Ver 2.7 Government Edition Patch 7 and earlier, Ver 2.8 Patch 6 and earlier, Ver 2.8c Patch 5 and earlier, Ver 2.9 Patch 4 and earlier) allows remote attackers to execute EL expression on the server via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2019-7743 | Critical | 2019-02-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Joomla! before 3.9.3. The phar:// stream wrapper can be used for objection injection attacks because there is no protection mechanism (such as the TYPO3 PHAR stream wrapper) to prevent use of the phar:// handler for non .phar-files. |
| CVE-2018-16621 | High | 2018-11-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager before 3.14 allows Java Expression Language Injection. |
| CVE-2018-12533 | Critical | 2018-06-18 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | JBoss RichFaces 3.1.0 through 3.3.4 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject expression language (EL) expressions and execute arbitrary Java code via a /DATA/ substring in a path with an org.richfaces.renderkit.html.Paint2DResource$ImageData object, aka RF-14310. |
| CVE-2018-12532 | Critical | 2018-06-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | JBoss RichFaces 4.5.3 through 4.5.17 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject an arbitrary expression language (EL) variable mapper and execute arbitrary Java code via a MediaOutputResource's resource request, aka RF-14309. |
| CVE-2011-4343 | High | 2017-08-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Information disclosure vulnerability in Apache MyFaces Core 2.0.1 through 2.0.10 and 2.1.0 through 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to inject EL expressions via crafted parameters. |
| CVE-2010-1871 | High | 2010-08-05 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for JBoss Expression Language (EL) expressions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when the Java Security Manager is not properly configured. |
| CVE-2009-1275 | Medium | 2009-04-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tiles 2.1 before 2.1.2, as used in Apache Struts and other products, evaluates Expression Language (EL) expressions twice in certain circumstances, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks or obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors, related to the (1) tiles:putAttribute and (2) tiles:insertTemplate JSP tags. |