Overview 13 matches · 8 protected · 10 exploited · 7 CISA KEV · 8 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
8
61.5%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
5
38.5%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
8
61.5%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
5
38.5%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
10
76.9%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
3
23.1%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 4 / year
20101
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20110
20120
20130
20140
20150
20160
20170
20181
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
20190
20202
Protected by Waratek2
Critical1
High1
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited2
20213
Protected by Waratek3
Critical3
blocked by ARMR today3
Exploited3
20224
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate2
Critical4
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked2
Exploited3
Proof of concept only1
20230
20240
20251
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20261
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-22738 | Critical | 2026-03-27 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | In Spring AI, a SpEL injection vulnerability exists in SimpleVectorStore when a user-supplied value is used as a filter expression key. A malicious actor could exploit this to execute arbitrary code. Only applications that use SimpleVectorStore and pass user-supplied input as a filter expression key are affected. This issue affects Spring AI: from 1.0.0 before 1.0.5, from 1.1.0 before 1.1.4. |
| CVE-2025-41243 | Critical | 2025-09-16 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux may be vulnerable to Spring Environment property modification. An application should be considered vulnerable when all the following are true: * The application is using Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux (Spring Cloud Gateway Server WebMVC is not vulnerable). * Spring Boot actuator is a dependency. * The Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux actuator web endpoint is enabled via management.endpoints.web.exposure.include=gateway. * The actuator endpoints are available to attackers. * The actuator endpoints are unsecured. |
| CVE-2022-22980 | Critical | 2022-06-23 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | A Spring Data MongoDB application is vulnerable to SpEL Injection when using @Query or @Aggregation-annotated query methods with SpEL expressions that contain query parameter placeholders for value binding if the input is not sanitized. |
| CVE-2021-31805 | Critical | 2022-04-12 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The fix issued for CVE-2020-17530 was incomplete. So from Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.29, still some of the tag’s attributes could perform a double evaluation if a developer applied forced OGNL evaluation by using the %{...} syntax. Using forced OGNL evaluation on untrusted user input can lead to a Remote Code Execution and security degradation. |
| CVE-2022-22963 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. |
| CVE-2022-22947 | Critical | 2022-03-03 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host. |
| CVE-2021-45046 | Critical | 2021-12-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | It was found that the fix to address CVE-2021-44228 in Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was incomplete in certain non-default configurations. This could allows attackers with control over Thread Context Map (MDC) input data when the logging configuration uses a non-default Pattern Layout with either a Context Lookup (for example, $${ctx:loginId}) or a Thread Context Map pattern (%X, %mdc, or %MDC) to craft malicious input data using a JNDI Lookup pattern resulting in an information leak and remote code execution in some environments and local code execution in all environments. Log4j 2.16.0 (Java 8) and 2.12.2 (Java 7) fix this issue by removing support for message lookup patterns and disabling JNDI functionality by default. |
| CVE-2021-44228 | Critical | 2021-12-10 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. |
| CVE-2021-21479 | Critical | 2021-02-09 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In SCIMono before 0.0.19, it is possible for an attacker to inject and execute java expression compromising the availability and integrity of the system. |
| CVE-2020-17530 | Critical | 2020-12-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Forced OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution. Affected software : Apache Struts 2.0.0 - Struts 2.5.25. |
| CVE-2020-10199 | High | 2020-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Sonatype Nexus Repository before 3.21.2 allows JavaEL Injection (issue 1 of 2). |
| CVE-2018-12533 | Critical | 2018-06-18 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | JBoss RichFaces 3.1.0 through 3.3.4 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject expression language (EL) expressions and execute arbitrary Java code via a /DATA/ substring in a path with an org.richfaces.renderkit.html.Paint2DResource$ImageData object, aka RF-14310. |
| CVE-2010-1871 | High | 2010-08-05 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for JBoss Expression Language (EL) expressions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when the Java Security Manager is not properly configured. |