Overview 5,062 matches · 365 in Waratek scope · 6 protected · 64 exploited · 23 CISA KEV · 113 public PoC · 27 EPSS ≥ 0.5
5,062matches
365in Waratek scope7.2%
6protected0.1%
64exploited1.3%
23CISA KEV0.5%
113public PoC2.2%
27EPSS ≥ 0.50.5%
Protected by Waratek
6
0.1%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
10
0.2%
No exploit published
349
6.9%
Outside Waratek scope
43
0.8%
Not applicable
4,654
91.9%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
6
0.1%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
5,056
99.9%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 2,602 / year
20011
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20020
20030
20040
20051
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20061
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20073
No exploit published1
Not applicable2
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20083
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20094
Not applicable4
Critical1
High1
Medium2
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20102
Not applicable2
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
Forecast only1
No public exploit1
20112
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20121
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20133
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable2
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20142
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20151
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20165
No exploit published3
Not applicable2
High2
Medium3
not blocked5
No public exploit5
201731
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable26
Critical5
High15
Medium11
not blocked31
Working exploit published1
No public exploit30
2018110
No exploit published21
Outside Waratek scope7
Not applicable82
Critical7
High44
Medium58
Low1
not blocked110
Exploited2
Working exploit published4
No public exploit104
2019126
No exploit published11
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable111
Critical19
High52
Medium53
Low2
not blocked126
Exploited5
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit112
2020186
No exploit published17
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable163
Critical17
High81
Medium82
Low6
not blocked186
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only1
No public exploit180
2021306
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate3
No exploit published28
Outside Waratek scope7
Not applicable265
Critical38
High114
Medium151
Low3
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked303
Exploited13
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit283
2022300
Mitigation candidate3
No exploit published24
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable270
Critical46
High99
Medium148
Low7
not blocked300
Exploited7
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only35
No public exploit250
2023431
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published28
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable397
Critical59
High184
Medium180
Low8
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked430
Exploited12
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only70
Forecast only1
No public exploit343
2024427
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published41
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable377
Critical70
High165
Medium182
Low10
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked425
Exploited8
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only65
No public exploit352
2025514
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published54
Not applicable459
Critical42
High132
Medium283
Low57
not blocked514
Exploited7
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only86
No public exploit417
20262,602
No exploit published120
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable2,481
Critical232
High989
Medium1,168
Low207
Unknown6
not blocked2,602
Exploited9
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only564
No public exploit2,023
200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-86356 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell PowerStore contains an authorization-bypass vulnerability that could lead to elevation of privilege to administrator. |
| CVE-2026-71531 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | PrestaShop before 8.2.9 and 9.2.1 contains an authorization flaw in the Webservice API that allows an attacker holding a key restricted to one shop to act on data of every shop by submitting requests with id_shop=all or id_shop_group=N, which expand the shop context without validating the key's actual shop associations and cause shopHasRight() to evaluate the expanded set as a disjunction. Attackers can exploit this flaw via classes/webservice/WebserviceRequest.php to read, modify, or delete data belonging to shops they are not authorized for, including full customer records such as email addresses, secure_key, and password hashes across the installation. |
| CVE-2026-61418 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SmartFabric OS10 Software, versions prior to 10.6.0.10, contains an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. |
| CVE-2026-129125 | Critical | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | C-Kermit 6.0.192 before 11.1.515 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows Kermit clients to run shell commands on servers with host commands disabled by abusing REMOTE QUERY evaluation. Attackers can send a REMOTE QUERY invoking the command function, or define a macro via REMOTE ASSIGN and call execute to reach RUN, bypassing the nopush restriction and DISABLE HOST. |
| CVE-2026-129120 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | C-Kermit 11.0.506 before 11.1.515 contains a RECEIVE CONFIRM bypass vulnerability that allows malicious Kermit servers to write unrequested files without prompting by abusing recursive GET root computation in ckcfns.c. Attackers can send files such as .ssh/authorized_keys or shell startup files under the current directory, which rq_under_root() accepts silently, enabling persistent access or code execution. |
| CVE-2026-129119 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | C-Kermit from 6.0.192 before 11.1.515 contains a file collision protection bypass that allows malicious senders to append data to existing files by marking transfers as RESEND. The gattr() function in ckcfn3.c clears the REJECT discard flag and switches to APPEND without a RECEIVE CONFIRM prompt, letting attackers modify files such as shell startup files. |
| CVE-2026-128986 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Eclipse BaSyx Go Components versions up to and including 1.1.3, ABAC-enabled deployments match `ROUTE` access rules against the fully decoded request path, while the router routes on the raw, still encoded path. An encoded slash (`%2F`) inside a path value is a segment separator for the access check but part of the value for the router, so a request can match a narrow `ROUTE` rule while the handler returns a different, larger resource. An authenticated caller whose rules grant READ only on parts of a resource can therefore read the whole resource. In the DPP API, a rule such as `/v1/dpps/*/elements/*`, meant to grant only passport elements, also grants the complete passport whose identifier contains `/elements/`. In the Submodel Repository, AAS Repository and AAS Environment, a rule such as `/submodels/*/submodel-elements/*/attachment`, meant to grant only file attachments, also grants the complete element whose stored idShort contains `%2F`. The issue is fixed in Eclipse BaSyx Go Components v1.1.4. |
| CVE-2026-128970 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Psono Server Community Edition versions 1.12.6 through 7.5.0 and Psono Server Enterprise Edition before 7.5.1 do not require accepted group membership when authorizing deletion of group share-rights. The DELETE /share/right/ endpoint checks for a membership matching the target group, the authenticated user, and share_admin=True, but omits accepted=True. An authenticated remote attacker who has been invited to a group with share-admin privileges, and who knows a group share-right UUID, can therefore delete that group's share-right record without accepting the invitation or after declining it. Pending invitations have accepted=None, while declined invitations retain accepted=False and the share_admin flag. Deletion revokes the group's access to the affected share and its contained secrets for all accepted group members, without deleting the underlying data or disclosing secret contents. The issue was fixed in version 7.5.1 of both editions, released on 2026-10-13. |
| CVE-2026-128790 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Eclipse BaSyx Go Components versions up to and including 1.1.2, ABAC-enabled deployments of the Submodel Repository and the AAS Environment do not apply an access rule's `FILTERLIST` fragment filters to single Submodel reads. `GET /submodels` removes the fields that a rule's `FILTERLIST` hides, but `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}` and `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/$metadata` return them unfiltered. An authenticated caller with READ access to a Submodel can therefore read fields that the access rules hide from them, for example `supplementalSemanticIds` keys that name the other parties allowed to read the Submodel. If versioning is enabled (`history.mode` set to `api` or `audit`), `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/$history` and `GET /shells/{aasIdentifier}/$history` in the Submodel Repository, AAS Repository and AAS Environment return the complete stored version without applying the rule's formula or fragment filters. A caller whose rules grant READ on these routes can read fields that the access rules hide, and Submodels and Asset Administration Shells that the direct read does not return to them at all. The issue is fixed in Eclipse BaSyx Go Components v1.1.3. |
| CVE-2026-128424 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Kroxylicious. The ACL authorizer's rules-file parser unquotes `matching /…/` regular-expression literals using the string unquoting rules, which strips every backslash escape. As a result, an allow rule such as `matching /orders\.v1/` is compiled as the regex `orders.v1`, which also matches unintended names such as `ordersXv1`, and character classes such as `\d` and `\w` lose their special meaning. Allow rules written with regex escapes can therefore apply to more resources than the author intended. Depending on the ACL configuration, this may allow an authenticated Kafka client to access a resource (such as read or write a topic) that should have been denied. |
| CVE-2026-128119 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SvelteKit is a framework for rapidly developing robust, performant web applications using Svelte. From version 2.60.1 until 3.1.1, applications using the experimental remote functions flag could assign the same generated identifier to separate non-exported query.batch functions. When those private functions shared a request batch, arguments intended for one function could be passed to another function, causing unexpected cross-function processing and possible disclosure of function arguments. This issue is fixed in 3.1.1. |
| CVE-2026-128088 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | russh is a Rust SSH client and server library that includes an SSH agent protocol implementation. Prior to version 0.65.1, try_sign() captures an Arc<PrivateKey> before awaiting Agent::confirm() and does not revalidate the shared lock state or key presence after the await. This is a distinct residual defect in the remediation for CVE-2026-116794. A peer, including a remote SSH server using agent forwarding, can begin a confirmation-constrained signature request while the agent is unlocked and receive the signature after another connection locks the agent if the stale confirmation returns true. New post-lock requests are rejected and private key material is not disclosed, but the pending operation bypasses the current lock state. This issue is fixed in version 0.65.1. |
| CVE-2026-128087 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | russh is a Rust SSH client and server library that includes an SSH agent protocol implementation. From version 0.55.0 until version 0.65.1, the initial key exchange invokes client::Handler::kex_done() with the raw shared secret before check_server_key() accepts the server host key or certificate. A malicious SSH server can therefore trigger application-defined secondary-channel initialization or early data handling even when the server identity is subsequently rejected. Ordinary clients that keep the callback's no-op default or independently defer callback-derived actions until trust is confirmed are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 0.65.1. |
| CVE-2026-128077 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Nuxt is an open-source web development framework for Vue.js. From 4.6.0 until 4.6.4, Nuxt parses a request path beginning with // as a URL host before rendering a page, while Nitro server/middleware and routeRules continue to evaluate the original path. An unauthenticated request such as //x/admin can therefore resolve to the /admin page without route-scoped serverHandlers, server/middleware path checks, redirects, or security headers configured for /admin. API handlers in server/api and server/routes, appMiddleware, page middleware are unaffected. This issue is fixed in version 4.6.4. |
| CVE-2026-128071 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Nuxt is an open-source web development framework for Vue.js. Nuxt from 3.0.0 until 4.6.4, @nuxt/nitro-server from 3.20.0 until 4.6.4, and @nuxt/vite-server from 4.6.0 until 4.6.4, routeRules matching leaves an encoded slash (%2F) in the request path while a catch-all page such as app/pages/[...slug].vue or a custom multi-segment page route decodes it into a route parameter. The getRouteRules result is therefore incomplete, and an unauthenticated request can render the page without the redirect, headers, proxy, SSR, noScripts, appMiddleware, or appLayout rules configured for the decoded path. Protected content is resolved only when the page interprets the decoded parameter accordingly: a custom multi-segment parameter can contain the decoded path, while a repeatable catch-all must join the slash-containing array element; route.path remains encoded and does not resolve that resource. Static pages, single-segment parameters, server/api handlers, and server/routes handlers are not affected because they do not have the same encoded-path mismatch. This issue is fixed in version 4.6.4. |
| CVE-2026-128065 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | @grpc/grpc-js implements the core functionality of gRPC purely in JavaScript, without a C++ addon. From 1.14.0 through 1.14.1, XdsServer in @grpc/grpc-js-xds can acknowledge Route and VirtualHost resources while failing to apply their RBACPerRoute override configurations. The override parser is not registered under the override message type, override maps are stored under a type URL instead of the configured HTTP filter name, and VirtualHost override maps are not read. When experimental RBAC is enabled and a trusted xDS control plane supplies a broad top-level ALLOW policy with a stricter matching override, affected servers evaluate RPCs under the broad policy and can accept requests that should be denied. This issue is fixed in version 1.14.2. |
| CVE-2026-128052 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenMage magento-lts before 20.19.0 and 21.0.0-beta1 before 21.0.0-beta3 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the template filter's {{layout}} directive, which renders arbitrary layout handles without enforcing the admin/block whitelist that the {{block}} directive applies. Administrators with rights to edit email, CMS, widget or newsletter content can embed {{layout}} with arbitrary handles to render disallowed blocks and disclose limited information. |
| CVE-2026-128037 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In gittuf 0.10.0 through 0.15.0, when a minimum threshold global rule and a policy rule protect the same namespace, verification gives the global rule's check over all trusted users in the policy precedence over the policy rule's own authorized users. A user listed in the policy file but not authorized by the policy rule, or fewer users than the rule's threshold, can make changes to the protected namespace that pass verification. |
| CVE-2026-128036 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In gittuf 0.4.0 through 0.16.0, when a policy update appears within the range of reference state log entries being verified, verification checks only the root of trust signatures of the new policy and not the signatures of its other metadata (rule files). A user trusted to push to the repository who bypasses gittuf policy apply and writes the policy reference and reference state log directly can make an invalid policy apply during verification, weakening or strengthening the rules for later changes. The update is still recorded in the reference state log. |
| CVE-2026-128035 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In gittuf 0.10.0 through 0.17.0, the verification workflow does not load policy updates that are propagated from an upstream (controller) repository and recorded in the reference state log after the first entry being verified. Only the propagated policy in effect at the start of verification is applied, so later controller changes to global rules, such as threshold requirements and force-push blocks, are ignored and changes that these rules should block pass verification. |
| CVE-2026-128034 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In gittuf before 0.18.0, verification of file protection rules uses the quoted, escaped pathnames that Git prints by default for files with special characters (for example non-ASCII characters) instead of the raw paths. Such paths do not match patterns like file:internal/*, so the files are treated as unprotected, and a user who is not authorized by a file protection rule can change a protected file whose name contains special characters and still pass verification. |
| CVE-2026-128031 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenMage magento-lts before 20.18.2 and 21.0.0-beta1 before 21.0.0-beta3 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability because admin controllers' _isAllowed() checks fall back to, or only check, parent ACL resources instead of finer per-action permissions. Authenticated restricted administrators can mass cancel or hold orders, rewrite order shipping addresses, export customer report data, or create REST roles despite their role denying those permissions. |
| CVE-2026-127102 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Eclipse BaSyx Go Components versions up to and including 1.1.2, ABAC-enabled deployments of the Submodel Repository and the AAS Environment return Submodel Elements that the caller is not authorized to read from `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/submodel-elements`. If an access rule grants READ on a single Submodel Element through a `$sme` `REFERABLE` object, the list route returns every element of that Submodel, including its value, as soon as one element matches the caller's rules. The single-element route and the full Submodel read enforce the same rule and deny access to the other elements. An authenticated caller with a READ grant for one element of a Submodel can therefore read all other elements of that Submodel. The issue is fixed in Eclipse BaSyx Go Components v1.1.3. |
| CVE-2026-126494 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenEMR before 8.4.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in ScopeRepository::finalizeScopes() that allows read-only SMART/OAuth clients to obtain write scopes because ScopeEntity::containsScope() ignores registered permissions. Attackers with a client registered for user/<resource>.read can request user/<resource>.write to create, update, and delete appointments or patient data. |
| CVE-2026-126473 | Critical | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | OpenEMR before 8.4.0 contains OAuth scope canonicalization and containment flaws that allow unauthenticated attackers to obtain unapproved system-level FHIR access. Attackers can register a colon-form system:Patient.read client that bypasses approval, then request unregistered system/Patient.write scope to read, modify, and create Patient records. |
| CVE-2026-126438 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenEMR before 8.5.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in interface/patient_file/rules/patient_data.php that allows read-only patients/med users to modify clinical-rule records. Attackers can submit a global form_entryID row ID to overwrite completion date, state, and result, including records of patients outside their configured squad. |
| CVE-2026-126433 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenEMR before 8.5.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in interface/drugs/dispense_drug.php, which checks only for admin/drugs view permission instead of write permission before dispensing medication. Authenticated users with read-only drug administration access can send GET requests with drug_id, quantity, fee, and encounter parameters to create false dispensing records and decrement inventory. |
| CVE-2026-126432 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | OpenEMR before 8.5.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in interface/orders/list_reports.php that allows read-only users to transmit lab orders because the patients/med check ignores write permission. Authenticated attackers can submit form_xmit with arbitrary procedure order IDs to send HL7 orders containing SSNs, insurance, and diagnoses to laboratories and mark them transmitted. |
| CVE-2026-126403 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Coder 2.26.0 before 2.29.24, 2.30.0 before 2.34.16, 2.35.0 before 2.36.11, 2.37.0 before 2.37.8, and 2.38.0 before 2.38.4 contains an improper authorization flaw in the external agent credentials endpoint, which returns the workspace agent token to users with only workspace read access rather than ssh permission. Authenticated users with roles such as Template Admin or Organization Admin can use the token to read the owner's private Git SSH key and Git provider OAuth tokens, and impersonate the agent to receive the owner's sessions. |
| CVE-2026-126402 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Fleet before 4.89.0 contains an incorrect authorization flaw in its user administration API that accepts user creation or modification when the caller administers any one of the assigned teams. Authenticated team administrators can grant users administrator roles on other teams, then deploy software and execute scripts on those teams' hosts. |
| CVE-2026-126367 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | @grpc/grpc-js implements the core functionality of gRPC purely in JavaScript, without a C++ addon. Before 1.13.2, and from 1.14.0 through 1.14.1, the @grpc/grpc-js-xds SafeRegexValueMatcher and PathSafeRegexValueMatcher add start and end anchors without grouping a supplied top-level alternation. An expression intended to match one of several complete values can therefore match a prefix, substring, or suffix. The affected matchers are used for route selection, xDS credential identity matching, and RBAC URL path, principal name, server name, and header rules. An ALLOW policy using an alternation can consequently accept a method, certificate identity, or header value outside the intended set, while a DENY policy becomes broader rather than permissive. This issue is fixed in versions 1.13.2 and 1.14.2. |
| CVE-2026-126358 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. From 4.1.4 until 4.13.16, RegExpRouter can omit wildcard middleware in three version-specific cases: since 4.13.0, middleware using the explicit default parameter pattern in /api/:tenant{[^/]+}/admin/* is not applied to a route written as /api/:tenant/admin/:id; since 4.1.4, middleware on /admin/* is not applied to a route registered as /admin* for paths under /admin/; and since 4.4.0, a request path containing an encoded line terminator can reach the not-found handler without wildcard middleware. The default SmartRouter selects RegExpRouter for most applications, and the router's registration-time coverage calculation treated the first two matching pattern pairs as different while its compiled wildcard did not match line terminators in the third case. An unauthenticated client can reach a route handler or the not-found handler without authentication or authorization middleware registered on the wildcard path. TrieRouter, LinearRouter, and PatternRouter apply the middleware in the three described cases. This issue is fixed in version 4.13.16. |
| CVE-2026-126318 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | REDAXO before 5.21.6 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows editors without the version[live_version] permission to modify live article versions by bypassing working version enforcement. Authenticated editors can add, edit, delete, toggle, or reorder live slices via content/functions, slice ids, content_slice_status, content_move_slice, history restore, or content_copy, bypassing approval workflows. |
| CVE-2026-126307 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Nezha Dashboard before 2.6.0 contains multiple authorization, tenant isolation, and resource exhaustion vulnerabilities that allow members or unauthenticated attackers to abuse NAT, DDNS, OAuth, cron, and server transfer features. Attackers can claim undeclared Dashboard hostnames to capture login bodies, hijack DDNS profiles, create executable schedules without exec scope, or exhaust memory via buffered NAT requests. |
| CVE-2026-126283 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | NocoDB before 2026.08.0 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability that lets base-scoped API tokens act as account-wide credentials because the token's base_id is never stored or checked. Attackers holding a leaked token can read, write and delete records on every base the token owner belongs to, including bases joined later. |
| CVE-2026-124723 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Interpretation Conflict, leading to Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache APISIX. With match_uri_encoded_slash enabled and skip_mtls_uri_regex configured, a client without a certificate can reach an upstream behind a route that requires one, limited to request paths that decode to an exempted URI. This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 3.18.0 through 3.19.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.20.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-124716 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache APISIX. An authenticated user who holds any one of a route's required permissions or scopes can reach the protected upstream without the others, including HTTP methods the authorization server denied. This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 1.4.0 through 3.19.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.20.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-124021 | Critical | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Control Web Panel (CWP) before webpanel_version 1.30.6 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the validate() function of api/v1/index.php that allows attackers holding a password-recovery token and a predictable legacy signature to obtain valid remote-API authorization without a proper API key. Attackers can exploit this flaw via the POST /cronjobsusers/ endpoint to add arbitrary cron commands and achieve command execution as the affected hosting account, and can also abuse the same token to access global account-list and account-detail routes exposing usernames, contact emails, and password hashes. |
| CVE-2026-116418 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell PowerScale InsightIQ, versions 6.3.0 through 6.4.0, contains an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-107522 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell PowerStore contains an Improper Authorization vulnerability. An authenticated user could exploit this vulnerability, potentially leading to privilege escalation to administrator. |
| CVE-2024-58405 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Zipline through 3.7.9 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the /api/auth/register endpoint, which enforces invite codes only when user registration is disabled, so registration succeeds without an invite when both invites and user registration are enabled. Unauthenticated attackers can send a direct POST request omitting the invite code to create accounts, view stats, and exhaust storage by uploading many files. |
| CVE-2026-87772 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in TÜBİTAK BİLGEM Software Technologies Research Institute Pardus About allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects Pardus About: before 1.2.5. |
| CVE-2026-75868 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Zohocorp ManageEngine DDI Central versions below 6301 is affected by an authorization bypass vulnerability that allowed authenticated non-administrative users to modify DHCP options on subnets belonging to unauthorized clusters. |
| CVE-2026-75867 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Zohocorp ManageEngine DDI Central versions below 6301 is affected by an authorization bypass vulnerability that allowed authenticated non-administrative users to modify Windows DHCP filter-list configurations across unauthorized clusters. |
| CVE-2026-71367 | Medium | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An incorrect authorization vulnerability was found in AWX's WebSocket consumer. The consumer_access() function only enforces access controls for object-level event groups (job_events, workflow_events, ad_hoc_command_events) but does not restrict subscriptions to global broadcast groups such as 'jobs-status_changed'. When an authenticated user subscribes to a global broadcast group, the server accepts the subscription without verifying that the user has permission to view the associated resources. In multi-organization deployments, this allows a low-privilege user in one organization to receive real-time job status metadata from all organizations, including job IDs, status transitions, timestamps, and infrastructure topology details such as instance group names, bypassing the organization isolation enforced by the REST API. |
| CVE-2026-68548 | Critical | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Algernon is a small self-contained pure-Go web server. Prior to version 1.17.10, Algernon's URL-prefix authorization gate matches its protected prefixes (/admin, /repo, /data) with case-sensitive strings.HasPrefix, while the exact same raw req.URL.Path is later resolved against the filesystem. On case-insensitive filesystems (Windows NTFS — always; macOS APFS/HFS+ — default), a request for /Admin/secret.lua evades every protected-prefix check, falls through to the public-prefix accept branch, and then resolves on disk to admin/secret.lua. The result is an unauthenticated bypass of the /admin, /repo, and /data authorization boundary, enabling read (and, for Lua files, execution) of protected content. The permission system is active in the default configuration. This issue has been patched in version 1.17.10. |
| CVE-2026-125870 | Low | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | BookStack before 26.09.3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in ImageController::checkImagePermission() that allows authenticated non-admin users to bypass page-level content restrictions for images whose owning page has been moved to the recycle bin, because the permission check relies on Page::getPage() which returns null for soft-deleted pages and silently skips the PageView check. Attackers can enumerate sequential image IDs via GET /images/edit/{id} to disclose metadata of restricted images, and users with image-update-all/image-delete-all privileges can rename, replace, or permanently delete images belonging to content they cannot view, persisting the damage even after the page is restored. |
| CVE-2026-124993 | Medium | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An incorrect authorization vulnerability in the Security Advisor in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.3.2-86009-5 and 7.4.1-90080-1 allows remote attackers to read specific files. |
| CVE-2026-124648 | Medium | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The TI WooCommerce Wishlist WordPress plugin before 2.13.0 does not verify that a visitor who is not logged in owns a registered user's wishlist before letting them manage it, allowing unauthenticated users who know or guess a wishlist's share key to delete items from other customers' wishlists. |
| CVE-2026-124628 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In affected versions of Octopus Server, incorrect validation of changes a user made to their own LDAP identity allowed them to edit that identity even when an Administrator had disabled self-service identity editing. This could result in the user gaining membership of teams mapped to external LDAP groups they do not belong to, and potentially escalating to full administrative privileges if any of those teams are privileged. |
| CVE-2026-124627 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In affected versions of Octopus Server, incorrect validation of the external identity linked to a newly registered user could result in that user receiving the LDAP-mapped team memberships and associated permissions of another user. This issue only affects instances with LDAP authentication enabled and LDAP groups mapped to Octopus teams. |
| CVE-2026-118531 | Low | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Directorist: AI-Powered Business Directory, Listings & Classified Ads WordPress plugin before 8.11.1 does not prevent a listing's own author from changing its status from pending to published, allowing users with a Subscriber-level account and above to bypass the administrator's listing moderation and publish their own pending listings. |
| CVE-2026-106475 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Elasticsearch data source resource proxy forwards the request method and path to Elasticsearch using the data source's own credentials, without restricting them to the operations the plugin needs. A user who can query the data source can alter index mappings or reach other indices on the cluster. [Improper authorization / path validation] |
| CVE-2026-93487 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In affected versions of Octopus Server, incorrect validation of the permissions assigned to a user that would allow them to create project triggers could result in the user being able to run runbooks or create deployments they were not authorised to perform. |
| CVE-2026-76079 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Probo is a self-hostable governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) platform built for engineering and security teams. Prior to version 0.224.0, an organization ADMIN can mint an OWNER membership via createUser, bypassing the owner-only set-owner authorization gate. This issue has been patched in version 0.224.0. |
| CVE-2026-13721 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A user with edit access to one folder could modify, move or delete Git Sync provisioned resources in folders where they only had view access, through the provisioning files API (incorrect authorization). |
| CVE-2026-126872 | Critical | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| CVE-2026-126866 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect authorization in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| CVE-2026-126860 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| CVE-2026-126854 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect authorization in Layout in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to obtain cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| CVE-2026-126850 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect authorization in SiteIsolation in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| CVE-2026-126811 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | BookStack before 26.09.3 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated users to access other users' unpublished draft page images by checking only PageView permission without draft status. Attackers can read drawio data via the base64 endpoint or rename, replace, or delete draft images by sequential ID to disclose or tamper with unpublished work. |
| CVE-2026-126808 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | weDevs ERP (WP ERP) through 1.17.11 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated employees to edit their own HR records because HRM AJAX handlers check erp_edit_employee instead of erp_manage_jobinfo. Attackers can post their own user_id with the My Profile nonce to change designation, reporting manager, pay rate, and employment type, or delete job history. |
| CVE-2026-126805 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | WWBN AVideo through 29.7.1 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability that allows delegated Videos Admin users to obtain video_id_hash values bound to any video owner via encoder endpoints like aVideoEncoderStatus.json.php. Attackers can request the hash for an administrator-owned video and replay it through useVideoHashOrLogin() for password-less login, gaining plugin upload, configuration, and user management access. |
| CVE-2026-126772 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | OpsTree REMS through 1.0.0 contains an improper attribution vulnerability that allows authenticated users to post comments as the incident creator via POST /api/v1/incidents/{incident_id}/comment. Lower-privileged attackers can comment on incidents owned by users such as a Super User to impersonate them and corrupt the incident timeline and audit trail. |
| CVE-2026-126566 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Semantic MediaWiki 7.3.1 before 7.4.1 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in EditProtectionUpdater::userMayChangeProtection() that checks protection changes against the page's latest revision author. Editors can add {{#set:Is edit protected=false}} to a transcluded template, removing administrator edit and move protection logged under the administrator's name. |
| CVE-2026-126251 | Critical | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-126250 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service via HTTP requests. |
| CVE-2026-126243 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access. Full impersonation however requires the attacker to obtain pre-required id and data via other means. |
| CVE-2026-126242 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access. Full impersonation however requires the attacker to obtain pre-required id and data via other means. |
| CVE-2026-126238 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authorization checks and gain unauthorized access to restricted functionality. |
| CVE-2026-126217 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated administrator to escalate their privileges, bypass authorization controls or impersonate internal services via specially crafted requests to the GUI. |
| CVE-2026-126215 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated administrator to escalate their privileges, bypass authorization controls or impersonate internal services via specially crafted requests to the GUI. |
| CVE-2026-126155 | Critical | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain an authenticated IBE webmail session as any IBE recipient and read or send their encrypted mail via crafted HTTP requests. |
| CVE-2026-124496 | Unknown | 2026-11-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The DRPC HTTP endpoint lets an authenticated client act as another user without applying the configured impersonation authorizer. An authenticated user can execute DRPC functions that are restricted to another user. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.2.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-123659 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The ProfilePress WordPress plugin before 4.17.6 does not restrict the role and user meta filters its member directories accept to those configured by the administrator, allowing unauthenticated users to list accounts a directory was set to hide and to recover user meta values of listed users. |
| CVE-2026-111024 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A user with the Viewer or Editor role could bypass folder permissions on Git Sync managed resources through the repository files API: a Viewer could read files in folders they could not access, and an Editor could create, modify, move or delete provisioned dashboards and folders there (incorrect authorization). |
| CVE-2026-111000 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A user with the Editor role who can edit a folder can move it, through the folders resource API, under a folder they administer, and so gain Admin on the moved folder and its contents, including the right to change their permissions. The legacy folder move API refuses the same move (improper privilege management). |
| CVE-2026-106133 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Progress® Telerik® Report Server prior to version 12.3.26.1110, an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the Web Report Designer allows an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized operations on shared report resources, affecting their integrity and availability. |
| CVE-2026-105948 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In affected versions of Octopus Server, incorrect validation of permissions assigned to a user that would allow them to edit their own login identities could result in that user being granted elevated permissions, up to and including system administrator access. This issue affects instances using LDAP authentication with self-service login editing enabled. |
| CVE-2026-102589 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When independent Grafana instances share the same [rendering] renderer_token, an image renderer key issued by one instance is accepted by the others, so a user on one instance could act as the user with the same ID on another (origin validation error). This affects instances with the renderAuthJWT feature toggle enabled, the default from Grafana 13.0.0. |
| CVE-2026-96162 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect authorization in Windows Clipboard Virtual Channel Extension allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-95988 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect authorization in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-89103 | Critical | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SAP Gateway activates the default Access Control List with high privileges allowing categorization of external attacker as internal application server. As a result an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the SAP Gateway could exploit this weakness to potentially perform unauthorized actions within the application environment, resulting in a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. |
| CVE-2026-82002 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Media Encoder is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-63287 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was possible for an authenticated non-admin user to modify certain data objects without having the appropriate permissions, which could be used to tamper with audit log creation in AXIS Camera Station. |
| CVE-2026-125397 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | NocoBase plugin-ai 2.1.0 through 2.2.41 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in getAccessibleAIEmployee() that lets authenticated users access unassigned AI employees by overriding the role-derived filter with a supplied username. Attackers can use the dispatch-sub-agent-task tool to run ungranted AI employees with their tools and permissions, and get-ai-employee to read their prompts and tool configuration. |
| CVE-2026-125380 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | DataRoom through 3.0.0 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in DatasetController.runTest that allows visitor-role users to execute dataset definitions supplied in the request body. Attackers can specify an arbitrary dataSourceCode and raw SELECT SQL to query any configured relational data source using its stored decrypted credentials, bypassing developer-only restrictions. |
| CVE-2026-125376 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | VanBlog through 0.54.0 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to read private and hidden articles via the POST /api/public/article/:id endpoint. Attackers can submit any non-empty password for private articles lacking an effective password, or request hidden articles, since getByIdWithPassword never checks the hidden flag, exposing full article content. |
| CVE-2026-125347 | Critical | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.50 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| CVE-2026-125337 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Winter CMS is a content management system built on the Laravel PHP framework. Prior to 1.2.14, the ImportExportController behavior applies userHasAccess() only to the import() and export() page actions, while Backend\Classes\Controller::execAjaxHandlers() dispatches onImport(), onImportLoadForm(), onImportLoadColumnSampleForm(), onExport(), and onExportLoadForm() before those gated actions run, and the separately reachable download() action also lacks the granular export check. An authenticated backend user with a valid session and coarse access through $requiredPermissions, but without the configured import[permissions] or export[permissions], can use the import handlers to write or overwrite records and can use onExport() followed by download() to retrieve the complete dataset exposed by the export model. Controllers without granular permission keys are unaffected because userHasAccess() is intentionally default-permissive. This issue is fixed in version 1.2.14. |
| CVE-2026-125331 | Critical | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HarnessRouter is a self-hosted unified API for running agent harnesses with sessions, streaming, files, cancellation, and failure handling. Prior to 0.31.8, a console that is not in self-hosted mode attaches the server's internal key to requests carrying an Authorization header before validating the bearer, while the service-only PUT and GET /v1/orgs/{org}/connections/{name}, PUT /v1/orgs/{org}/policy/{backend}, and /internal/* routes trust that key and take the organization from the URL. In a multi-organization deployment, a remote caller can use a made-up bearer to rewrite another organization's provider connection to an attacker-controlled endpoint, causing later prompts to be disclosed and attacker-controlled responses to influence tasks. This issue is fixed in version 0.31.8. |
| CVE-2026-125271 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect normalization of operation names in the custom security policy enforcement in awslabs aws-api-mcp-server before 1.5.1 might allow an actor to execute AWS API operations across AWS services that the operator's security policy was configured to deny or require elicitation for, via calls to operations whose names contain consecutive capital letters. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.5.1. |
| CVE-2026-123391 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect authorization in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| CVE-2026-122099 | Low | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | CAI Content Credentials is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized limited write access. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-121913 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Connect is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to sensitive information or functionality. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-121355 | Critical | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Connect is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to sensitive information or functionality. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-121352 | Critical | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Connect is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to sensitive resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-120826 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authorization flaw in the aggregation and view-definition handling of sharded deployments may allow a user holding only basic read-write privileges on a single database to define a view whose underlying processing is not fully subjected to privilege checking. Reading that view may result in unintended access to data belonging to other databases held on the same shard. |
| CVE-2026-120822 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | MongoDB Server may omit an authorization check on the resource that a replication-related administrative command actually targets, because that check is conditioned on a value taken from the client's own request. A user holding backup and restore privileges may therefore read and relocate collections outside the set that user is permitted to access. This may result in unintended access to data and unintended changes to the collection catalog. |