Overview 110 matches · 2 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
110matches
2in Waratek scope1.8%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
2
1.8%
Outside Waratek scope
1
0.9%
Not applicable
107
97.3%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
110
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
44
40.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
66
60.0%
split by
peak 41 / year
20192
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20203
Not applicable3
Medium3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20216
Not applicable6
High1
Medium5
not blocked6
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit3
202215
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable13
Critical4
High4
Medium7
not blocked15
Proof of concept only5
No public exploit10
202312
Not applicable12
High2
Medium8
Low2
not blocked12
Proof of concept only5
No public exploit7
202413
Not applicable13
Critical1
High4
Medium7
Low1
not blocked13
Proof of concept only4
No public exploit9
202518
Not applicable18
High7
Medium9
Low2
not blocked18
Proof of concept only6
No public exploit12
202641
No exploit published1
Not applicable40
High2
Medium21
Low18
not blocked41
Proof of concept only21
No public exploit20
20192020202120222023202420252026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-4111 | Medium | 2021-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | yetiforcecrm is vulnerable to Business Logic Errors |
| CVE-2021-36012 | Medium | 2021-09-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Magento Commerce versions 2.4.2 (and earlier), 2.4.2-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.7 (and earlier) are affected by a business logic error in the placeOrder graphql mutation. An authenticated attacker can leverage this vulnerability to altar the price of an item. |
| CVE-2021-22926 | High | 2021-08-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | libcurl-using applications can ask for a specific client certificate to be used in a transfer. This is done with the `CURLOPT_SSLCERT` option (`--cert` with the command line tool).When libcurl is built to use the macOS native TLS library Secure Transport, an application can ask for the client certificate by name or with a file name - using the same option. If the name exists as a file, it will be used instead of by name.If the appliction runs with a current working directory that is writable by other users (like `/tmp`), a malicious user can create a file name with the same name as the app wants to use by name, and thereby trick the application to use the file based cert instead of the one referred to by name making libcurl send the wrong client certificate in the TLS connection handshake. |
| CVE-2021-22922 | Medium | 2021-08-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | When curl is instructed to download content using the metalink feature, thecontents is verified against a hash provided in the metalink XML file.The metalink XML file points out to the client how to get the same contentfrom a set of different URLs, potentially hosted by different servers and theclient can then download the file from one or several of them. In a serial orparallel manner.If one of the servers hosting the contents has been breached and the contentsof the specific file on that server is replaced with a modified payload, curlshould detect this when the hash of the file mismatches after a completeddownload. It should remove the contents and instead try getting the contentsfrom another URL. This is not done, and instead such a hash mismatch is onlymentioned in text and the potentially malicious content is kept in the file ondisk. |
| CVE-2021-22897 | Medium | 2021-06-11 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | curl 7.61.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from exposure of data element to wrong session due to a mistake in the code for CURLOPT_SSL_CIPHER_LIST when libcurl is built to use the Schannel TLS library. The selected cipher set was stored in a single "static" variable in the library, which has the surprising side-effect that if an application sets up multiple concurrent transfers, the last one that sets the ciphers will accidentally control the set used by all transfers. In a worst-case scenario, this weakens transport security significantly. |
| CVE-2020-8228 | Medium | 2020-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A missing rate limit in the Preferred Providers app 1.7.0 allowed an attacker to set the password an uncontrolled amount of times. |
| CVE-2020-8181 | Medium | 2020-07-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A missing file type check in Nextcloud Contacts 3.2.0 allowed a malicious user to upload any file as avatars. |
| CVE-2019-15608 | Medium | 2020-03-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The package integrity validation in yarn < 1.19.0 contains a TOCTOU vulnerability where the hash is computed before writing a package to cache. It's not computed again when reading from the cache. This may lead to a cache pollution attack. |
| CVE-2019-3787 | High | 2019-06-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cloud Foundry UAA, versions prior to 73.0.0, falls back to appending “unknown.org” to a user's email address when one is not provided and the user name does not contain an @ character. This domain is held by a private company, which leads to attack vectors including password recovery emails sent to a potentially fraudulent address. This would allow the attacker to gain complete control of the user's account. |
| CVE-2019-3789 | Medium | 2019-04-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cloud Foundry Routing Release, all versions prior to 0.188.0, contains a vulnerability that can hijack the traffic to route services hosted outside the platform. A user with space developer permissions can create a private domain that shadows the external domain of the route service, and map that route to an app. When the gorouter receives traffic destined for the external route service, this traffic will instead be directed to the internal app using the shadow route. |