Overview 15,641 matches · 62 in Waratek scope · 2 protected · 235 exploited · 167 CISA KEV · 382 public PoC · 170 EPSS ≥ 0.5
15,641matches
62in Waratek scope0.4%
2protected0.0%
235exploited1.5%
167CISA KEV1.1%
382public PoC2.4%
170EPSS ≥ 0.51.1%
Protected by Waratek
2
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
2
0.0%
No exploit published
58
0.4%
Outside Waratek scope
128
0.8%
Not applicable
15,445
98.7%
Withdrawn CVE
6
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
2
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
15,639
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 2,433 / year
20021
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20032
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20045
Not applicable5
High5
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
20053
Not applicable3
High3
not blocked3
Working exploit published2
No public exploit1
20065
Not applicable5
High3
Medium2
not blocked5
Working exploit published3
No public exploit2
20077
Not applicable7
High6
Medium1
not blocked7
Working exploit published1
No public exploit6
20086
Not applicable6
High6
not blocked6
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
Forecast only1
No public exploit2
200914
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable13
High13
Medium1
not blocked14
Exploited4
Working exploit published4
No public exploit6
201027
Not applicable27
Critical1
High17
Medium8
Low1
not blocked27
Exploited6
Working exploit published4
No public exploit17
201130
Not applicable30
Critical1
High18
Medium11
not blocked30
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit28
201232
Not applicable32
Critical2
High25
Medium5
not blocked32
Exploited4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit27
201320
Not applicable20
Critical2
High11
Medium7
not blocked20
Exploited4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit15
201415
Not applicable15
Critical1
High12
Medium2
not blocked15
Exploited2
Working exploit published2
No public exploit11
201521
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable19
Critical2
High14
Medium5
not blocked21
Exploited9
Working exploit published1
No public exploit11
2016175
Not applicable175
Critical22
High140
Medium13
not blocked175
Exploited4
Working exploit published13
No public exploit158
2017263
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable262
Critical54
High172
Medium37
not blocked263
Exploited5
Working exploit published22
Proof of concept only3
Forecast only2
No public exploit231
2018863
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope13
Not applicable849
Critical180
High608
Medium74
Low1
not blocked863
Exploited20
Working exploit published43
Proof of concept only5
Forecast only1
No public exploit794
20191,294
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope28
Not applicable1,265
Critical345
High810
Medium138
Low1
not blocked1,294
Exploited20
Working exploit published61
Proof of concept only11
Forecast only10
No public exploit1,192
20201,389
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope18
Not applicable1,370
Critical272
High876
Medium237
Low4
not blocked1,389
Exploited27
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only10
Forecast only7
No public exploit1,334
20211,579
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope28
Not applicable1,547
Critical213
High1,096
Medium266
Low4
not blocked1,579
Exploited27
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only12
Forecast only11
No public exploit1,526
20222,282
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published18
Outside Waratek scope14
Not applicable2,242
Withdrawn CVE6
Critical478
High1,276
Medium508
Low14
Unknown6
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked2,280
Exploited31
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only280
Forecast only6
No public exploit1,961
20231,985
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published19
Outside Waratek scope12
Not applicable1,953
Critical546
High992
Medium442
Low5
not blocked1,985
Exploited28
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only508
Forecast only2
No public exploit1,445
20242,017
No exploit published7
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable2,006
Critical269
High1,465
Medium274
Low9
not blocked2,017
Exploited14
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only384
Forecast only2
No public exploit1,612
20251,173
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable1,170
Critical142
High771
Medium220
Low38
None2
not blocked1,173
Exploited15
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only226
No public exploit930
20262,433
No exploit published7
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable2,421
Critical309
High1,505
Medium543
Low72
Unknown4
not blocked2,433
Exploited13
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only461
No public exploit1,956
2002200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-97692 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.6, 1.5.2, and 1.6.1, the BACnet/SC message decoder walks the header-option list by following each option's MORE bit. Nothing rejects a list whose last option still has the MORE bit set, and the decode walk has no upper bound on how many options it processes. A single crafted BVLC-SC frame makes the walk advance one option past the end of the message and read message[message_len], one byte out of bounds. When the bytes after the message carry more MORE-set option markers, the walk keeps going: it runs past the fixed 4-entry option array and writes decoded option fields out of bounds. On the server that decode array is the static global bsc_dm, so the out-of-bounds write lands in adjacent BSS. Both faults are reachable before authentication, from the first frame a peer sends on a BACnet/SC connection, and the bytes that follow the message are the same peer's prior-frame data. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.6, 1.5.2, 1.6.1, and 1.7.0. |
| CVE-2026-97357 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Out-Of-Bounds Write due to missing input validation is possible in the autoprogramming interface of SpaceCom and Space Battery pack with WiFi which could lead to a denial of service of the affected communication device. |
| CVE-2026-82414 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. From versions 1.4.0 to before 1.4.6, 1.5.0 to before 1.5.1, and 1.6.0 to before 1.6.1, the BACnet MS/TP receive path decodes COBS frames into an output pointer inside the same fixed input buffer, but passes the full input-buffer size as the decode capacity. A long valid COBS payload can therefore write past the end of the actual remaining buffer. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.6, 1.5.1, 1.6.1, and 1.7.0. |
| CVE-2026-74911 | Unknown | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Software installed and run as a non-privileged user may conduct improper GPU system calls to the execution of an error path that triggers an OOB read & write. An error can be triggered which causes the index of the array element to be cleaned up by the error path would be outside of the array bounds. |
| CVE-2026-58498 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.5, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0, there is a remote global-buffer-overflow in the official router-ipv6 application shipped with bacnet-stack, this results in an out-of-bounds write to the global transmit buffer under ASan. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.5, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0. |
| CVE-2026-52788 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.5, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0, the bsc_node_parse_urls() function in src/bacnet/datalink/bsc/bsc-node.c contains three distinct bugs when parsing space-separated WebSocket URIs from a BACnet/SC Address Resolution ACK message. Two bugs cause out-of-bounds writes past the utf8_urls[10][129] array in the static BSC_ADDRESS_RESOLUTION structure. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.5, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0. |
| CVE-2026-52787 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.5, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0-rc2, a reachable out-of-bounds write exists when encoding the device.address-binding property. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.5, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0-rc2. |
| CVE-2026-49990 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. From versions 1.4.2 to before 1.4.5, and 1.5.0 to before 1.5.1, a signed fileStartPosition taken from AtomicReadFile and AtomicWriteFile stream-access requests is not validated tightly enough before it reaches the RAM file backends. Practical impact includes: reliable denial of service via process crash, out-of-bounds read that may expose adjacent memory contents, or out-of-bounds write that may corrupt heap memory and destabilize the process. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.5 and 1.5.1. |
| CVE-2026-49747 | Unknown | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Software installed and run as a non-privileged user may conduct GPU system calls to trigger an integer overflow and allow OOB writes to GPU buffers. The integer overflow caused when mapping a GPU buffer >4GB causes corruption of array length, and can lead to kernel panics or out of bounds access. |
| CVE-2026-16671 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | split_image_check() in boot/bootutil/src/loader.c declares a fixed uint8_t loader_hash[32] buffer and passes it as the out_hash out-parameter to bootutil_img_validate(). That routine copies IMAGE_HASH_SIZE bytes into out_hash (memcpy(out_hash, hash, IMAGE_HASH_SIZE) in boot/bootutil/src/image_validate.c), where IMAGE_HASH_SIZE is a compile-time constant of 64 for MCUBOOT_SHA512 or 48 for MCUBOOT_SIGN_EC384/SHA-384 (boot/bootutil/include/bootutil/crypto/sha.h). The buffer tracks SHA-256 (32 bytes) while the copy length tracks the configured algorithm, so the write overruns the buffer by 16 or 32 bytes. The overflow is only present in a non-default configuration: the legacy Mynewt split-image feature must be compiled (split_go()/split_image_check(), i.e. neither MCUBOOT_DIRECT_XIP nor MCUBOOT_RAM_LOAD), the digest must be larger than 32 bytes (MCUBOOT_SHA512 or MCUBOOT_SIGN_EC384), and MCUBOOT_SIGN_PURE must be off. split_go() is a public API with no caller inside MCUboot; it is invoked from a Mynewt application. In the default SHA-256 build there is no overflow. The over-written bytes are the one-way digest of the loader image and the overflow length is fixed at build time, so the contents are not meaningfully attacker-controlled and the size is not attacker-chosen. The realistic impact is bounded, uncontrolled corruption of the bootloader's stack on the split-boot path, manifesting as instability or failed boot in the affected configuration rather than reliable code execution. The fix is to size loader_hash to IMAGE_HASH_SIZE and pass IMAGE_HASH_SIZE as the matching seed length. |
| CVE-2026-129122 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | C-Kermit 6.0.192 before 11.1.515 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in tn_snenv() in ckctel.c that allows malicious Telnet servers to corrupt client memory via crafted NEW-ENVIRON SEND subnegotiation. Malicious or machine-in-the-middle servers can send oversized variable names before authentication, overflowing a 16-byte stack buffer and a miscomputed heap buffer to corrupt stack and heap memory. |
| CVE-2026-128990 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | xschem 2.9.9 through 3.4.7 contains a heap out-of-bounds write vulnerability in read_dataset() in src/rawtovcd.c due to an unchecked variable index. Attackers can supply a crafted ngspice .raw file that, when converted with rawtovcd, writes file-controlled heap pointers at chosen signed offsets, corrupting heap memory. |
| CVE-2026-128067 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Pillow is a Python imaging library. From 2.3.0 through 12.3.0, Pillow applications that save compressed TIFF images through libtiff can pass attacker-controlled image geometry tags to the encoder while allocating its row buffer from the actual image dimensions. The affected TiffImagePlugin._save path allows ImageWidth, ImageLength, or SamplesPerPixel from exif=, tiffinfo=, or a source TIFF IFD to make libtiff consume a larger scanline than the buffer supplied by ImagingLibTiffEncode. This can read heap memory into the generated TIFF or crash the process. When TIFF Predictor 2 is enabled, libtiff can rewrite the oversized scanline in place and corrupt memory beyond the buffer. A carried-over PlanarConfiguration value of 2 instead makes libtiff use a shorter scanline and can produce an undecodable output file, but is not established to cause the out-of-bounds access. This issue is fixed in version 13.0.0. |
| CVE-2026-128014 | Critical | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | FrankenPHP standalone static binaries 1.8.0 before 1.13.2 bundle the PHP brotli extension statically linked with Brotli 1.2.0, whose decoder contains an out-of-bounds write (CVE-2026-111497). Unauthenticated remote attackers can send crafted data to applications that pass it to brotli_uncompress_add() to crash the entire FrankenPHP process, and possibly cause memory disclosure or code execution. |
| CVE-2026-127122 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | P-Net before 1.0.4 does not check the number of MCR request blocks in a Connect request against the number of multicast communication relations that an Application Relationship has room for (PNET_MAX_MC_CR, 1 by default). Each further block is written past the end of the array, into the rest of the Application Relationship and, with more blocks, into the following one. The written data comes from the request. No established Application Relationship is needed, and the attacker requires ADJACENT network access. Builds with PNET_OPTION_MC_CR disabled are not affected. |
| CVE-2026-126792 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A memory-safety flaw in the key-management request-building component of the library can lead to an out-of-bounds write on the heap. A fixed-size output buffer is used under an assumption about cryptographic key size that is never validated, so when the library is embedded by a caller that supplies its own cryptographic callback implementation, data larger than the buffer can be written past its end. Exploitation requires the ability to control the embedding application's in-process key-management provider configuration, a high-privilege position. The demonstrated impact is memory corruption resulting in abnormal termination of the client process. |
| CVE-2026-123975 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Grid Community Toolkit before 6.2.20261111 (globus-gss-assist before 12.9) contains a heap out-of-bounds write in globus_gss_assist_token_get_fd() triggered by SSLv2 record lengths below 3. Remote unauthenticated clients can send a crafted GSI handshake record to services like globus-gatekeeper and myproxy to corrupt heap memory and crash the service. |
| CVE-2026-123338 | Unknown | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Apache DataSketches C++. An application that deserializes a REQ sketch from an untrusted source can have heap memory corrupted by a crafted sketch, because the serialized compactor headers were not validated. This issue affects Apache DataSketches C++: from 3.0.0 through 5.3.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.3.1, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-123274 | Unknown | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Apache DataSketches C++. An application that deserializes a KLL sketch from an untrusted source can have heap memory corrupted by a crafted sketch, because the serialized level boundaries were not validated. This issue affects Apache DataSketches C++: 2.0.0 through 5.3.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.3.1, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-52786 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.5, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0, in the official apps/epics client tool on v1.6.0-rc1 (not in the generic BACnet RPM ACK decoder alone) a malicious BACnet/IP endpoint can reply to the EPICS tool’s legitimate ReadPropertyMultiple request with a syntactically valid ReadPropertyMultiple-ACK that contains more heading properties than the tool’s fixed local storage can hold. The response is decoded successfully and later consumed by ProcessRPMData(), which writes property values into a fixed global array using an unbounded linear index. This results in a reproducible global-buffer-overflow in apps/epics/main.c. This is a network-reachable memory corruption in the official epics tool’s response-processing path. The root cause is that apps/epics treats a remotely supplied variable-length RPM property list as if it were a trusted, fixed-size local heading-property set. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.5, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0. |
| CVE-2026-47711 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.4, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0, the current master demo server can be crashed remotely over BACnet/IP by sending a valid Confirmed WriteProperty request that updates loop-1's controlled-variable-reference to point to life-safety-zone-1 / accepted-modes. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.4, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0. |
| CVE-2026-47710 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.4, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0, a stack-buffer-overflow can be triggered in the current master branch when a Loop object reads a referenced property through its default timer path and the referenced property is OBJECT_STRUCTURED_VIEW / PROP_DESCRIPTION containing a long attacker-controlled string. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.4, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0. |
| CVE-2026-47259 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.4, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0, a RemoveListElement request targeting Notification-Class.recipient-list can trigger a stack-based out-of-bounds write in the current master branch when the request contains more than NC_MAX_RECIPIENTS valid BACnetDestination elements. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.4, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0. |
| CVE-2026-47258 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.4, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0, a stack-based out-of-bounds write exists in the Notification Class object implementation when handling AddListElement for the recipient-list property. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.4, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0. |
| CVE-2026-127030 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in freeradius. An improper length validation in the EAP-FAST module allows a stack-based buffer overflow during session ticket processing. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this flaw by sending a specially crafted handshake request, causing the server process to crash and resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). |
| CVE-2026-127029 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in freeradius's Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for Subscriber Identity Module (EAP-SIM) module. When handling authentication requests, the server copies a client-supplied identity into an internal structure without properly checking its length against a fixed-size buffer. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this issue by sending specially crafted EAP-SIM messages, triggering a stack buffer overflow that crashes the service and results in a Denial of Service (DoS). |
| CVE-2026-114567 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OriginLab Origin Viewer OGWU File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OriginLab Origin Viewer. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of OGWU files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-30771. |
| CVE-2026-114565 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OriginLab Origin Viewer OGG File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OriginLab Origin Viewer. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of OGG files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-30769. |
| CVE-2026-114564 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OriginLab Origin Viewer OGG File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OriginLab Origin Viewer. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of OGG files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-30768. |
| CVE-2026-114562 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OriginLab Origin Viewer OGWU File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OriginLab Origin Viewer. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of OGWU files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write before the start of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-30736. |
| CVE-2026-114561 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OriginLab Origin Viewer OPJU File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OriginLab Origin Viewer. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of OPJU files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-30433. |
| CVE-2026-114560 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OriginLab Origin Viewer OPJ File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OriginLab Origin Viewer. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of OPJ files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-30432. |
| CVE-2026-114559 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OriginLab Origin Viewer OGG File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OriginLab Origin Viewer. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of OGG files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-30431. |
| CVE-2026-114558 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OriginLab Origin Viewer OPJU File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OriginLab Origin Viewer. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of OPJU files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-30738. |
| CVE-2026-114467 | Low | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write possible in Git when git-merge(1) used on tag with more than two GPG signatures |
| CVE-2026-63660 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | node-fontnik is a library that delivers a range of glyphs rendered as SDFs (signed distance fields) in a protocol buffer. Prior to version 0.7.7, a crafted font could trigger a heap out-of-bounds write in RenderSDF (include/mapbox/glyph_foundry_impl.hpp). RenderSDF computed the SDF bitmap allocation size as buffered_width * buffered_height in 32-bit unsigned int. Glyph dimensions are derived from the uploaded font's outline bounding box with no upper bound, so a glyph large enough to make that product exceed 2³² wrapped to a small value. The buffer was then under-allocated while the render loop still wrote one byte per pixel, corrupting the heap (CWE-190 → CWE-787) and crashing the process. A 680-byte font is enough to drive FreeType to a 65536×65536 buffered glyph, wrapping the size to 0. This issue has been patched in version 0.7.7. |
| CVE-2026-48479 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Use of uninitialized or invalid state in AMD Graphics Driver could allow a local attacker to write out of bounds, potentially resulting in loss of integrity or denial of service. |
| CVE-2026-126893 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out of bounds write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| CVE-2026-126840 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out of bounds write in Network in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| CVE-2026-126497 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | LibreCAD through 2.2.1.6 contains a heap-based out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the bundled libdxfrw dwgReader18::parseDataPage() function due to unchecked buffer size and page offsets. Attackers can craft an AC1018 (R2004) DWG file with malicious startOffset values that cause decompress18 to write past the heap buffer when opened, causing crashes and potential code execution. |
| CVE-2026-126245 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via http requests, should the attacker be able to defeat ASLR protections. |
| CVE-2026-126228 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.4 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.4 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.4 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.4 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated remote attacker with admin privileges to execute unauthorized code or commands via a specially crafted request. |
| CVE-2026-126154 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service via a specially crafted HTTP request. |
| CVE-2026-124741 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in BusyBox. The udhcpc6 DHCPv6 client does not properly validate the size of network options sent by a server before copying them into memory. A malicious DHCPv6 server on the local network can exploit this flaw by sending a crafted reply, triggering a stack-based buffer overflow. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution with root privileges or cause a denial of service (DoS) crash. |
| CVE-2026-124739 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in BusyBox. When the httpd web server processes subdirectory configuration files, an overly long index page name can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow. An attacker with permissions to write to a subdirectory configuration file could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges or cause a denial of service (DoS) by crashing the server process. |
| CVE-2026-124737 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in BusyBox. When the TFTP (Trivial File Transfer Protocol) client requests a custom small block size and receives a standard response, it falls back to the default block size without resizing the allocated memory buffer. A malicious TFTP server can exploit this issue by sending standard-sized network packets during a transfer, causing a heap buffer overflow. This flaw allows an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution or cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by crashing the application. |
| CVE-2026-0329 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A buffer overflow vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software enables an unauthenticated attacker with network access to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition by sending specially crafted network traffic to or through a dataplane interface. Cloud NGFW and Panorama are not affected by this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-0326 | Low | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A buffer overflow vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software enables an unauthenticated attacker to disrupt service processing by causing a service process crash or memory corruption. Panorama and Prisma® Access are not affected by this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-96981 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in Windows PCI Bus Driver allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges with a physical attack. |
| CVE-2026-96031 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-96020 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in DNS Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| CVE-2026-91759 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability in Hitachi Dynamic Link Manager for Linux. This issue affects Hitachi Dynamic Link Manager for Linux: from 7.5.0-00 before 9.0.5-00. |
| CVE-2026-90833 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The simulated EEPROM driver validated access ranges in eeprom_range_is_valid() (drivers/eeprom/eeprom_simulator.c) with a single test, (offset + len) <= config->size. Because offset is a signed off_t and len an unsigned size_t of the same rank, the addition is evaluated in unsigned arithmetic: a negative offset combined with a compensating len wraps the sum back into the accepted range. eeprom_sim_read() and eeprom_sim_write() then memcpy() through the EEPROM(addr) macro, which is plain pointer arithmetic on the driver's static mock_eeprom array, so the copy addresses memory located before that array. eeprom_read() and eeprom_write() are __syscall entry points, and their verification handlers in drivers/eeprom/eeprom_handlers.c check only the device object and the caller's own data buffer (K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_READ/K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_WRITE) — the offset argument is passed to the driver unvalidated. With CONFIG_USERSPACE=y, a CONFIG_EEPROM_SIMULATOR device instance, and the device object granted to a user thread (the usage the in-tree tests/drivers/eeprom/api suite exercises from ZTEST_USER threads), an unprivileged thread could supply a negative offset and have the kernel perform the copy on its behalf. The result is an out-of-bounds read of kernel .bss returned into the caller's buffer and, via the write path, an out-of-bounds write of caller-supplied bytes over kernel memory preceding mock_eeprom. Both the start address and the length of the affected span are attacker-selected, so the primitive is sufficient to corrupt adjacent kernel state and escape the user-mode sandbox. Exposure is limited to builds that instantiate the simulated EEPROM (status = "okay" by default on qemu_x86 and native_sim, otherwise added by a devicetree overlay) together with userspace isolation. The fix rejects negative offsets and performs the remaining bound check without overflow. |
| CVE-2026-88707 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An out-of-bounds write in certain ASUS Router firmware allows an unauthenticated nearby user to send an HTTP request containing parameters that exceed the buffer length, potentially overwriting other memory regions or causing the system to crash. Refer to the ' Security Update for ASUS Router Firmware ' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information. |
| CVE-2026-82391 | Critical | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The HTTP/2 front-end of the Zephyr HTTP server aliased connection receive state as a scratch output. In subsys/net/lib/http/http_server_http2.c, handle_http2_static_fs_resource() passed &client->data_len as the file_size out-parameter of http_server_find_file(). client->data_len is the count of unprocessed bytes remaining in the fixed-size per-connection receive buffer client->buffer[CONFIG_HTTP_SERVER_CLIENT_BUFFER_SIZE] (256 bytes by default), an invariant every frame handler and the socket receive path rely on. Serving any static file therefore replaced that bounded value with the file's on-disk size, and nothing resets it afterwards. The defect is reached by an unauthenticated HTTP/2 GET for any file under the web root, in applications that register a static-filesystem resource (HTTP_RESOURCE_TYPE_STATIC_FS) with CONFIG_FILE_SYSTEM=y; CONFIG_HTTP_SERVER_VERSION_2 is enabled by default and no TLS or credentials are required on this path. Once client->data_len exceeds the buffer size, the frame dispatch loop in subsys/net/lib/http/http_server_core.c keeps parsing past the end of the received data, and the peer controls the bytes at client->cursor, so it can choose which fabricated frame the state machine consumes next by appending bytes after its request. The inflated length defeats the only guards on the buffer. parse_http_frame_header() and the per-frame handlers read and skip up to a 24-bit frame length beyond the buffer (out-of-bounds read); the compaction memmove(client->buffer, client->cursor, client->data_len) at the end of request handling copies the file-size number of bytes into the 256-byte buffer, overflowing the rest of struct http_client_ctx — including the current_detail/current_stream pointers, the parser_settings function-pointer table and the inactivity_timer work handler — and the adjacent client contexts in static memory; and the subsequent zsock_recv(client->fd, client->buffer + client->data_len, sizeof(client->buffer) - client->data_len, 0) underflows its size argument, writing attacker-supplied data of attacker-chosen length out of bounds. The impact is remote memory corruption in the server's single address space: at minimum a crash or hang of the device, and plausibly control-data overwrite leading to code execution. The HTTP/1 and HTTP/3 static-filesystem handlers already used a local variable and are unaffected; the fix makes the HTTP/2 handler use a local size_t file_size as well. |
| CVE-2026-82012 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Premiere Pro is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-77685 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The RFCOMM multiplexer control-channel handler in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/rfcomm.c computed the echo length for a BT_RFCOMM_TEST command as buf->len - 1 and passed it to rfcomm_send_test(), whose length parameter is a uint8_t. A malformed but FCS-valid UIH frame on DLCI 0 can leave buf->len == 0 after rfcomm_handle_msg() pulls the two-byte MCC header, so buf->len - 1 underflows and narrows to 255. rfcomm_send_test() then copies 255 bytes out of a receive buffer that holds no remaining valid data, and appends them to an outgoing L2CAP PDU allocated with only CONFIG_BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU (253 by default for CONFIG_BT_CLASSIC) bytes of tailroom. The source read runs past the end of the ACL receive buffer into adjacent buffers of the same net_buf pool, and the destination copy overruns the transmit buffer by about eight bytes; net_buf_add_mem() performs no runtime bounds check in ordinary builds, where the underlying __ASSERT_NO_MSG() is compiled out. The trigger is a single five-byte RFCOMM frame on the multiplexer control channel, which is processed as soon as the L2CAP channel for PSM 3 is established — before any DLC exists and independent of RFCOMM session state. bt_rfcomm_init() registers that L2CAP server with .sec_level = BT_SECURITY_L1, which l2cap_br_conn_security() accepts without any link key from a peer that does not claim host Secure Simple Pairing support, so an unpaired BR/EDR device in radio range of a connectable target with CONFIG_BT_RFCOMM enabled (SPP, HFP, HSP, GOEP and similar profiles all enable it) can reach the defect. The resulting 255-byte TEST response is transmitted back to the attacker, disclosing roughly 255 bytes of adjacent stack/pool memory — including the contents of neighbouring receive buffers, which an attacker can prime with earlier packets — and the accompanying out-of-bounds write corrupts memory following the transmit buffer, which can crash the Bluetooth host. The request is trivially repeatable, so both the disclosure and the corruption can be driven at will. Two fixes are needed, and the first on its own does not close the out-of-bounds write. Fix 1 (0040ef781e1d, #115768) strips the FCS byte in rfcomm_recv() and echoes buf->len, rejecting anything over UINT8_MAX, which removes the underflow and the over-read. But rfcomm_make_uih_msg() still allocates the response with bt_l2cap_create_pdu() and never compares the requested length with the buffer's tailroom, so a well-formed TEST command carrying a pattern of about 248 bytes or more still builds a response (3-byte frame header, 2-byte message header, pattern, FCS) larger than the 253 bytes available. A pattern that long can only be received when the RFCOMM L2CAP receive MTU (CONFIG_BT_RFCOMM_L2CAP_MTU, which defaults to CONFIG_BT_BUF_ACL_RX_SIZE) exceeds CONFIG_BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU. The plain BR/EDR defaults (200 against 253) cannot reach it, but from v4.3.0 enabling CONFIG_BT_GOEP raises CONFIG_BT_BUF_ACL_RX_SIZE to 264 (265 from v4.4.0), so GOEP builds with only fix 1 applied still overrun the transmit buffer by up to eight bytes. This includes v4.3.2, the last v4.3 release, which carries fix 1 but will not receive fix 2. Fix 2 (214530895dd3, #118293) checks the tailroom on every RFCOMM PDU allocation and closes this residual write. |
| CVE-2026-76970 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Due to a Memory Corruption vulnerability in Application Server ABAP for SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform, an unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted requests to the application. If processed by the application, these requests could trigger a memory corruption condition in the parsing routine, which could cause the affected processes to crash and restart. By repeatedly sending such requests, the attacker could cause a sustained denial of service, leading to a high impact on availability. Confidentiality and integrity remain unaffected. |
| CVE-2026-66334 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AMI APTIOV contains vulnerabilities in BIOS where privileged users may cause the “Out-of-Bounds Write” by local access. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may lead to a denial of service during firmware update processing, such as a crash or failed update if the out-of-bounds write hits unmapped memory. It could also impact Integrity, and Availability. |
| CVE-2026-61547 | Critical | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | rabbitmq-c is a C-language AMQP client library for RabbitMQ. Prior to version 0.17.0, a heap buffer overflow exists in rabbitmq-c when the public amqp_send_frame() API is used to serialize an oversized AMQP_FRAME_BODY. The issue occurs because amqp_frame_to_bytes() copies frame.payload.body_fragment.len bytes into the connection outbound buffer without validating that the body fragment fits within the allocated frame buffer. An application that passes an oversized body frame to amqp_send_frame() can trigger a heap out-of-bounds write, resulting in process crash and memory corruption. This issue has been patched in version 0.17.0. |
| CVE-2026-59625 | Critical | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In GetTwiddledMiptreeSparsePageMap of texmgmt.c, there is a possible way to trigger an out of bounds write due to a logic error. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58789 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In s_gen_tile_param of multiple files, there is a possible way to trigger an out of bounds write in tile parameter arrays due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-57891 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in the XmlCliCommonDxe for the Intel(R) Server Board D50DNP and Intel(R) Server Board M50FCP within Ring 0 UEFI may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-57882 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in the XmlCliCommonDxe for the Intel(R) Server Board D50DNP and Intel(R) Server Board M50FCP within Ring 0 UEFI may allow an escalation of privilege. Startup code and smm adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-56435 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in the XmlCliCommonDxe for the Intel(R) Server Board D50DNP and Intel(R) Server Board M50FCP within Ring 0 UEFI may allow an escalation of privilege. Startup code and smm adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-50109 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write for some Intel(R) Performance Counter Monitor (Intel(R) PCM) within Ring 3: User Applications may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (low) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-50077 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Invalid Memory Access via the MSI-X table in QVM could allow an attacker in the guest to execute arbitrary code in the QVM to cause memory corruption, information disclosure or a crash of the QVM. |
| CVE-2026-44606 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write for some Intel(R) Intelligent Storage Acceleration Library within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-42956 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write for some Intel(R) Wireless Bluetooth(R) within Ring 0: Kernel may allow a denial of service. Network adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via adjacent access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-41224 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in the UEFI firmware for the Intel(R) Slim Bootloader within Ring 0: Bare Metal OS may allow an escalation of privilege. Startup code and smm adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via physical access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-40694 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write for some Hyperscan before version v5.4.2.1 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (low), integrity (low) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-35683 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write for some Intel(R) Multi-Buffer Crypto for IPSec within Ring 3: User Applications may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (low) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-33279 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write for the Intel(R) VTune(TM) Profiler software before version 2026.0.0 within Ring 1: Device Drivers may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (low), integrity (low) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-33094 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write for some Hyperscan before version v5.4.2.1 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (low) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-32667 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write for the Intel(R) VTune(TM) Profiler software within Ring 1: Device Drivers may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-28743 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write for the Intel(R) VTune(TM) Profiler software before version 2026.0.0 within Ring 1: Device Drivers may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (low), integrity (low) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-14968 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | EDK2 contains vulnerabilities in BIOS where skilled and privileged users or attackers may cause “Out-of-bounds Write” by local access. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could compromise SMM handler integrity, cause system instability, and lead to denial of service. It could also impact Integrity and Availability. |
| CVE-2026-125742 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | 7-Zip before 26.06 contains a heap out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the LZX decoder that lets attackers corrupt memory when a continuation CAB volume declares a smaller window. Attackers can entice victims to extract crafted multi-volume CAB archives, where a stale _pos value bypasses bounds checks, enabling arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2026-125709 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libstdc++. When a byte-by-byte write operation fails during file stream processing, the library may still append data into the internal memory buffer. An attacker capable of inducing repeated write failures in an affected service can trigger a buffer overflow, potentially resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) or memory corruption. |
| CVE-2026-125707 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in GStreamer's MXF demuxer. When an application processes a crafted MXF file, an off-by-one bounds check can allow a one-byte write past the logical end of a temporal offset array. This may corrupt memory and cause the application to crash. The extent of the impact has not been demonstrated by a runtime test. |
| CVE-2026-125348 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out of bounds write in GPU in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.50 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| CVE-2026-124747 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in BusyBox. When resuming a download over File Transfer Protocol (FTP), the wget utility fails to verify that the resume offset does not exceed the file size reported by the server, resulting in an integer calculation error. A malicious FTP server or an on-path network attacker can exploit this issue by returning crafted file size metadata, triggering a heap-based buffer overflow with attacker-controlled data. Successful exploitation may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code or crash the application, resulting in a denial of service (DoS). |
| CVE-2026-121368 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On affected platforms running Arista EOS with Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) configured to use keyed MD5 or keyed SHA1 authentication, an unauthenticated attacker with network adjacency (direct or multi-hop) to a BFD-enabled interface can send a specially crafted BFD packet resulting in a system reboot. |
| CVE-2026-120008 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SAP NetWeaver (Internet Graphics Service) does not sufficiently validate certain input values within incoming requests. An unauthenticated user could send a specially crafted request to trigger an out-of-bounds memory write in a worker process. Successful exploitation could result in memory corruption or repeated termination of the affected process, resulting in a high impact on availability and a low impact on integrity with no impact on confidentiality. |
| CVE-2026-119958 | Critical | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in Windows LDAP - Lightweight Directory Access Protocol allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| CVE-2026-117547 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Photoshop Desktop is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-116928 | Critical | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in Microsoft Windows Search Component allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| CVE-2026-116003 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Photoshop Desktop is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-113567 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Audition is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-113565 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Audition is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-113555 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Audition is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-113553 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Audition is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-113547 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Media Encoder is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-113545 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Media Encoder is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-113543 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Media Encoder is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-113541 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Media Encoder is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-113538 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | After Effects is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-113536 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | After Effects is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-113530 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | After Effects is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |
| CVE-2026-113528 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | After Effects is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. |