Overview 8 matches · 0 protected · 2 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 6 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
8
100.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
8
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
25.0%
Working exploit published
6
75.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 1 / year
20091
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20100
20111
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20121
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20131
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20140
20151
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20160
20170
20181
Mitigation candidate1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20190
20200
20210
20221
Mitigation candidate1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20231
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20092011201320152017201920212023
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-48292 | Critical | 2023-11-20 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The XWiki Admin Tools Application provides tools to help the administration of XWiki. Starting in version 4.4 and prior to version 4.5.1, a cross site request forgery vulnerability in the admin tool for executing shell commands on the server allows an attacker to execute arbitrary shell commands by tricking an admin into loading the URL with the shell command. A very simple possibility for an attack are comments. When the attacker can leave a comment on any page in the wiki it is sufficient to include an image with an URL like `/xwiki/bin/view/Admin/RunShellCommand?command=touch%20/tmp/attacked` in the comment. When an admin views the comment, the file `/tmp/attacked` will be created on the server. The output of the command is also vulnerable to XWiki syntax injection which offers a simple way to execute Groovy in the context of the XWiki installation and thus an even easier way to compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the whole XWiki installation. This has been patched by adding a form token check in version 4.5.1 of the admin tools. Some workarounds are available. The patch can be applied manually to the affected wiki pages. Alternatively, the document `Admin.RunShellCommand` can also be deleted if the possibility to run shell commands isn't needed. |
| CVE-2022-28108 | High | 2022-04-19 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Selenium Server (Grid) before 4 allows CSRF because it permits non-JSON content types such as application/x-www-form-urlencoded, multipart/form-data, and text/plain. |
| CVE-2018-8718 | High | 2018-03-27 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Mailer Plugin 1.20 for Jenkins 2.111 allows remote authenticated users to send unauthorized mail as an arbitrary user via a /descriptorByName/hudson.tasks.Mailer/sendTestMail request. |
| CVE-2015-5188 | Medium | 2015-10-27 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Web Console (web-console) in Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform before 6.4.4 and WildFly (formerly JBoss Application Server) before 2.0.0.CR9 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that make arbitrary changes to an instance via vectors involving a file upload using a multipart/form-data submission. |
| CVE-2013-6357 | Medium | 2013-11-13 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Manager application in Apache Tomcat 5.5.25 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that manipulate application deployment via the POST method, as demonstrated by a /manager/html/undeploy?path= URI. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this report, stating that "the Apache Tomcat Security team has not accepted any reports of CSRF attacks against the Manager application ... as they require a reckless system administrator. |
| CVE-2011-2908 | Medium | 2012-11-23 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the JMX Console (jmx-console) in JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform before 5.2.2, BRMS Platform 5.3.0 before roll up patch1, and SOA Platform 5.3.0 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that perform operations on MBeans and possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2010-3271 | Medium | 2011-07-18 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Integrated Solutions Console (aka administrative console) in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0.0.13 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that disable certain security options via an Edit action to console/adminSecurityDetail.do followed by a save action to console/syncworkspace.do. |
| CVE-2009-0039 | Medium | 2009-04-17 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web administration console in Apache Geronimo Application Server 2.1 through 2.1.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the web administration password, (2) upload applications, and perform unspecified other administrative actions, as demonstrated by (3) a Shutdown request to console/portal//Server/Shutdown. |