Overview 4,988 matches · 225 in Waratek scope · 5 protected · 6 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 314 public PoC · 7 EPSS ≥ 0.5
4,988matches
225in Waratek scope4.5%
5protected0.1%
6exploited0.1%
0CISA KEV0.0%
314public PoC6.3%
7EPSS ≥ 0.50.1%
Protected by Waratek
5
0.1%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
5
0.1%
No exploit published
215
4.3%
Outside Waratek scope
40
0.8%
Not applicable
4,723
94.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
5
0.1%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4,983
99.9%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 1,081 / year
20021
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20030
20041
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20054
Not applicable4
Medium4
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20061
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
200734
No exploit published2
Not applicable32
Medium34
not blocked34
Working exploit published8
No public exploit26
200864
Not applicable64
Medium64
not blocked64
Working exploit published8
No public exploit56
2009109
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published1
Not applicable107
Medium109
not blocked109
Working exploit published32
No public exploit77
201071
No exploit published3
Not applicable68
Medium71
not blocked71
Working exploit published23
No public exploit48
201154
Mitigation candidate1
Not applicable53
Medium54
not blocked54
Working exploit published12
No public exploit42
2012153
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable148
Medium153
not blocked153
Exploited1
Working exploit published46
No public exploit106
2013116
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published5
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable104
Medium116
not blocked116
Working exploit published29
No public exploit87
2014244
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope7
Not applicable230
Medium244
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked240
Working exploit published62
Forecast only2
No public exploit180
2015229
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope9
Not applicable217
Medium229
not blocked229
Exploited1
Working exploit published42
No public exploit186
20168
Not applicable8
Medium8
not blocked8
No public exploit8
201733
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable30
Medium33
not blocked33
Working exploit published8
No public exploit25
201879
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable74
Medium79
not blocked79
Working exploit published7
No public exploit72
2019169
No exploit published33
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable134
Medium169
not blocked169
Exploited1
Working exploit published11
No public exploit157
2020155
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published15
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable138
Medium155
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked154
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit146
2021214
No exploit published9
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable204
Medium214
not blocked214
Exploited1
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit209
2022376
No exploit published33
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable338
Medium376
not blocked376
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only55
Forecast only1
No public exploit315
2023358
No exploit published27
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable330
Medium358
not blocked358
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only61
No public exploit296
2024723
No exploit published17
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable703
Medium723
not blocked723
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only220
No public exploit501
20251,081
No exploit published25
Not applicable1,056
Medium1,081
not blocked1,081
Exploited1
Proof of concept only139
No public exploit941
2026711
No exploit published33
Not applicable678
Medium711
not blocked711
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only139
No public exploit571
2002200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-126485 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | OpenEMR before 8.5.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in ObservationController::deleteAction that allows attackers to delete observation form records without a CSRF token. Attackers can lure a logged-in clinician to a page issuing a GET to delete.php with guessed id values, soft-deleting observations in the victim's open encounter. |
| CVE-2026-126355 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.13.16, csrf() limits origin validation to the content types normally sent by HTML forms and therefore does not validate text/ping requests generated by Chromium hyperlink auditing. Chrome and Edge can send a cross-origin credentialed POST without a CORS preflight through an <a ping> action, and the middleware then skips both Origin and Sec-Fetch-Site checks. The fixed request body limits exploitation to state-changing endpoints whose effect is selected by the path or query string and does not depend on submitted body data. The user's cookie must accompany the request, which generally requires a same-site origin or a cookie configured with SameSite=None, and Firefox does not send hyperlink-auditing pings by default. This issue is fixed in version 4.13.16. |
| CVE-2026-126323 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Vvveb through 1.0.8.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform admin state-changing actions because checkCsrf() in admin/controller/base.php only validates tokens for POST requests. Attackers can lure a logged-in admin into loading a forged cross-site GET request to delete admin/user accounts, sites, orders, and menus or change comment status. |
| CVE-2026-77168 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in tracker-invocation.php in Revive Adserver 6.0.8 and earlier allows an attacker to modify a tracker's name, description or advertiser assignment using an authenticated victim's permissions. A leftover state-changing handler accepts request parameters without verifying a CSRF token, although it is not used by the normal invocation-tag interface. Exploitation requires victim interaction and a request path that carries the victim's session credentials. The issue is fixed in Revive Adserver 6.0.9 by removing the unused tracker-modification handler. |
| CVE-2026-125445 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Infomaniak Network VOD Infomaniak vod-infomaniak allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects VOD Infomaniak: from n/a through 1.5.16. |
| CVE-2026-124263 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in plainware Locatoraid Store Locator locatoraid allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Locatoraid Store Locator: from n/a through 3.9.75. |
| CVE-2026-121770 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VillaTheme VISeek viseek-easy-custom-search allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects VISeek: from n/a through 1.0.5. |
| CVE-2026-121472 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The AutomatorWP WordPress plugin before 6.0.8 does not bind the requests that complete its Zoom and AWeber integration connections to the administrator who started them, allowing attackers to make a logged-in administrator replace the stored integration credentials with the attacker's own via a CSRF attack, diverting the data the site sends to those services into an account the attacker controls. Exploitation requires the integration to already be connected and knowledge of the site's OAuth client identifier. |
| CVE-2026-105154 | Medium | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the Planet feed aggregator administration of Apache Roller 4.0 through 6.1.6 allows an unauthenticated attacker to make the Roller server fetch a URL the attacker chooses, including internal addresses, by inducing a logged-in global administrator to open a crafted web page. The action that adds a Planet subscription can be triggered cross-site; in recent releases it accepts GET requests, which Roller's CSRF token check does not cover. The action fetches the supplied URL and saves the subscription, and any fetched content that parses as a feed is then published without authentication in the aggregated Planet feed. The Planet aggregator is enabled by default. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Roller 6.1.7 or later, which requires POST requests with a valid CSRF token for Planet administration changes and turns the Planet aggregator off by default. |
| CVE-2026-89131 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal does not sufficiently protect certain server-side actions against cross-site request forgery. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link that, when clicked by an authenticated user, triggers an unintended action on the server. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to modify non-sensitive information, resulting in a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality and availability. |
| CVE-2026-60041 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An unauthenticated remote attacker can perform a CSRF attack on a logged in backend user allowing for execution of multiple critical system actions. This could allow an attacker to shutdown the server or restore an uploaded backup. This can result in a loss of integrity and availability. |
| CVE-2026-125339 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Winter CMS is a content management system built on the Laravel PHP framework. From 1.0.319 until 1.2.14, Backend\Classes\Controller::actionExists() accepts public handler-shaped methods as page actions, so a top-level GET request can invoke state-changing backend AJAX handlers without a CSRF token. Because backend routes use Route::any, CSRF validation skips GET, and the default SameSite=Lax session cookie is sent on cross-site navigation, an unauthenticated attacker can induce an authorized backend user to follow a link such as /backend/system/eventlogs/index_onEmptyLog. Affected handlers in the backend, CMS, and system modules can truncate logs, reset settings, alter backend user state, or delete CMS templates, while URL path segments can select a target record. This issue is fixed in version 1.2.14. |
| CVE-2026-118152 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery (csrf) in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. |
| CVE-2026-112137 | Medium | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability has been identified in Mendix Studio Pro 11 (All versions >= V11.15.0 < V11.16.0), Mendix Studio Pro 11.12 (All versions >= V11.12.6 < V11.12.7). The affected products MCP Server does not properly validate Content-Type and Origin headers on incoming HTTP requests, leaving it vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). This could allow a malicious web page to trick a user's browser into sending unauthorized requests and executing unintended actions on the local MCP Server. |
| CVE-2026-84229 | Medium | 2026-11-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of CSRF tokens for GET requests. |
| CVE-2026-14963 | Medium | 2026-11-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Cognos Command Center 10.2.4.1 and 10.2.5 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized processes due to cross-site request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-123495 | Medium | 2026-11-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vikunja 2.0.0 before 2.7.1 accepts form-encoded bodies on the /api/v2 login and OIDC callback endpoints without CSRF or Origin checks, enabling login cross-site request forgery. An attacker with an account can lure a victim to a page posting the attacker's credentials or OIDC code, switching the victim into the attacker's account and exposing data the victim then adds. |
| CVE-2026-123494 | Medium | 2026-11-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vikunja before 2.7.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to import their data into a victim's account because the Todoist, Microsoft To Do, and Trello migration OAuth callbacks lack a bound state parameter. Attackers can authorize their own account, keep the unused callback code or token, and lure a logged-in victim to the migration callback route to auto-import attacker-chosen projects and tasks containing phishing links. |
| CVE-2026-17369 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to force a user to authenticate into an attacker-controlled account due to cross-site request forgery. The sign-in flow does not sufficiently verify that a login response belongs to the user's own request, which could link the victim's session to an account controlled by the attacker. |
| CVE-2026-17312 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to force a user to authenticate into an attacker-controlled account due to cross-site request forgery. The sign-in flow does not sufficiently verify that a login response belongs to the user's own request, which could link the victim's session to an account controlled by the attacker. |
| CVE-2026-122675 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wpmet Wp Social wp-social allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Wp Social: from n/a through 3.2.3. |
| CVE-2026-121783 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Passionate Programmer Peter WP Data Access wp-data-access allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Data Access: from n/a through 5.5.90. |
| CVE-2026-119484 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Supsystic Photo Gallery by Supsystic gallery-by-supsystic allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Photo Gallery by Supsystic: from n/a through 1.21.6. |
| CVE-2026-117588 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The WP Google Review Slider WordPress plugin before 18.11 does not perform nonce validation when updating its active Google Places configuration, allowing attackers to alter or destroy that configuration via a forged request, provided they can trick a site administrator into following a crafted link. |
| CVE-2026-120640 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | CGI versions before 5.00 for Perl allow the POSTDATA, PUTDATA, PATCHDATA and XForms:Model parameters to be set from the query string or form fields. CGI stores a non-form request body under POSTDATA, PUTDATA or PATCHDATA, and an XForms body under XForms:Model, but also accepts these names from the query string, a form field or a multipart part, so an application cannot tell a client-sent value from the real body. A cross-site HTML form can post POSTDATA={"admin":true} to an endpoint that reads JSON from param('POSTDATA'), a request forgery that needs no CORS preflight. |
| CVE-2026-105296 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple Akeeba products lack the anti-CSRF check on some actions. If the user access a malicious page while logged into the product, unintended operations may be performed. |
| CVE-2025-71454 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | vtenext before 25.02.2 contains a cross-site request forgery protection bypass because csrf_check() in include/utils/VteCsrf.php skips __csrf_token validation for non-POST requests. Attackers can induce a logged-in user to open a crafted link sending state-changing GET requests, which handlers read from $_REQUEST, performing actions as that user. |
| CVE-2026-63433 | Medium | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | MyTube is a self-hosted downloader and player for several video websites. Prior to 1.10.6, shouldSkipCsrfProtection() in backend/src/middleware/csrfConfig.ts delegates to isApiKeyRequest(), which grants a CSRF exemption based only on the presence of an x-api-key header or an Authorization: ApiKey value rather than successful API-key validation. With a permissive CORS_ALLOWED_ORIGINS configuration, an unauthenticated attacker can lure an authenticated administrator to attacker-controlled content that sends a cross-origin state-changing request with an arbitrary API-key value. The victim's session cookie authenticates the request while CSRF token validation is skipped, allowing destructive or other administrator API operations such as deleting media, triggering downloads, or changing subscriptions. This issue is fixed in version 1.10.6. |
| CVE-2026-110288 | Medium | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an unauthenticated attacker to delete stored Slack and Microsoft Teams ChatOps configuration and provider credentials by inducing an authenticated Management Console operator's browser to send a cross-site GET request to the integration removal endpoint without a CSRF token. Exploitation required configured ChatOps integrations and an operator visiting attacker-controlled content while signed in to the Management Console; deletion could disrupt ChatOps notifications and commands when configuration was applied or services reloaded. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.23 and was fixed in versions 3.19.14, 3.20.10, 3.21.8, and 3.22.3. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. |
| CVE-2026-120249 | Medium | 2026-11-01 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Thelia Back-office Default Twig Template before 1.1.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the /admin/product/combinations/update and /admin/product/default-price/update routes, which accept GET requests without anti-CSRF token checks. Attackers can lure a logged-in administrator into following a crafted link to rewrite product combination prices, stock, weight, EAN and sale flags, zeroing omitted prices. |
| CVE-2026-120206 | Medium | 2026-10-31 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Thelia before 3.2.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the back office that allows attackers to forge administrative actions because per-session CSRF tokens leak via URL query strings. Attackers can reuse leaked tokens or target the unprotected setToggleVisibilityAction and updatePositionAction to make logged-in administrators delete, hide or reorder catalogue and configuration objects. |
| CVE-2026-45141 | Medium | 2026-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Chamilo LMS is an open-source learning management system. Prior to 2.0.1, the `add`, `delete_gradebook_from_skill`, `save_profile`, and `delete_profile` actions in `public/main/inc/ajax/skill.ajax.php` perform database mutations without `Security::check_token()` validation. An attacker can use cross-site request forgery to cause an authenticated administrator or DRH who visits a malicious page to create, modify, or delete skill records and profiles, or remove skill-gradebook associations. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.1. |
| CVE-2026-119466 | Medium | 2026-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPExperts APIExperts Square for WooCommerce woosquare allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects APIExperts Square for WooCommerce: from n/a through 4.7.5. |
| CVE-2026-118570 | Medium | 2026-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Fasttoggle allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Fasttoggle versions: from 0.0.0 to 4.1.1. |
| CVE-2026-118543 | Medium | 2026-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Core allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Commerce Core versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.41.0, from 3.0.0 to 3.3.13. |
| CVE-2026-114541 | Medium | 2026-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Frontend Editing allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Frontend Editing versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.9.3. |
| CVE-2026-112374 | Medium | 2026-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | FOSSBilling before 0.8.9 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in the staff guest login endpoint (POST /api/guest/staff/login) that allows remote attackers to force authentication because checkGuestClientAuthentication() only allowlists client_login and client_create, leaving staff_login without CSRF or Origin validation. Attackers can host an auto-submitting HTML form with attacker-controlled credentials to silently log a victim's browser into the attacker's staff account. |
| CVE-2026-107262 | Medium | 2026-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Advanced Filesystem allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Advanced Filesystem versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.0.28. |
| CVE-2026-5702 | Medium | 2026-10-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SABBATIC application that allows an attacker can trick an authenticated user into clicking a malicious link or loading a page that sends unauthorized requests to a vulnerable endpoint. |
| CVE-2026-27062 | Medium | 2026-10-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPFunnels Team WPFunnels wpfunnels allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WPFunnels: from n/a through 3.13.5. |
| CVE-2026-115300 | Medium | 2026-10-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Contact Form by Supsystic WordPress plugin before 1.11.1 does not validate a CSRF token or request origin on two administrator-only actions that bulk-delete captured form submissions and wipe a form's statistics, allowing attackers to permanently destroy a site's stored contact leads and analytics by tricking a logged-in administrator into sending a forged request. |
| CVE-2026-115299 | Medium | 2026-10-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Contact Form by Supsystic WordPress plugin before 1.11.1 does not verify a CSRF nonce before saving its mail settings, allowing an attacker to overwrite the site's outbound mail configuration, including the SMTP server, its credentials and the notification recipient, by tricking a logged-in administrator into visiting a crafted page, which can route the Contact Form by Supsystic WordPress plugin before 1.11.1's contact-form notifications through infrastructure the attacker controls. |
| CVE-2026-110983 | Medium | 2026-10-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The WP Photo Album Plus WordPress plugin before 9.3.04.004 does not verify the origin or a security token for one of its comment-management requests, allowing attackers to delete photo comments by tricking a logged-in user who holds comment-moderation rights into loading a crafted page. |
| CVE-2026-118266 | Medium | 2026-10-28 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Echo is a Go web framework. Prior to 4.16.0 and 5.4.0, Echo's MethodOverride middleware accepts a safe HTTP method as the override target for a POST request. When MethodOverride is registered before CSRF in the post-routing middleware chain, route selection retains the original state-changing POST handler but the override changes the method before CSRF evaluates it, causing both token validation and Sec-Fetch-Site checks to be skipped. A cross-site exploit requires an authenticated victim and an override value that a browser-submitted request can control, such as the form getter used by the advisory reproducer; the default X-HTTP-Method-Override header getter is not settable by a cross-site form. This issue is fixed in 4.16.0 and 5.4.0. |
| CVE-2026-113486 | Medium | 2026-10-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Media Library Assistant WordPress plugin before 3.42 does not verify a CSRF nonce on its Empty Trash media action, so a forged cross-site request can cause a logged-in user with the Editor role or above to permanently delete every trashed attachment on the site. |
| CVE-2026-113485 | Medium | 2026-10-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Media Library Assistant WordPress plugin before 3.42 does not consistently validate its CSRF nonce on the Media Library bulk-action handler, checking the nonce only when its field is present, so a forged request that omits the field can cause a logged-in user with the Author role or above to trash or delete attachments. |
| CVE-2026-117534 | Medium | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | REDAXO before 5.21.3 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the structure/history plugin that allows attackers to delete history or roll back content via unvalidated GET requests. Attackers can lure logged-in backend users to a page triggering func=clearall or rex_history_function=snap, permanently deleting all article snapshots or reverting articles to earlier states. |
| CVE-2026-116895 | Medium | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | REDAXO before 5.21.5 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability because the backend processes the safemode GET parameter in index.php without validating a CSRF token. Attackers can lure a logged-in administrator into opening a crafted link to disable global safe mode, writing safe_mode: false to config.yml, or enable session safe mode, disabling backend addons. |
| CVE-2026-102787 | Medium | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Joomla Extension - phoca.cz - CSRF in category management in Phoca Download 3.1.0 - 6.1.5 |
| CVE-2026-97295 | Medium | 2026-10-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in David Lingren Media LIbrary Assistant media-library-assistant allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Media LIbrary Assistant: from n/a through 3.42. |
| CVE-2026-77058 | Medium | 2026-10-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | boneIO Black is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on all state-changing API endpoints because it lacks CSRF tokens and does not validate Origin or Referer headers. A remote attacker can craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by a user on the internal network, sends cross-origin requests to the device. This allows the attacker to reboot the controller, toggle relay circuits, control gates and blinds, or shut down the device, causing loss of integrity and availability. Critically, due to CVE-2026-77053 (authentication disabled by default), any user on the same internal network can trigger attacker-controlled actions by visiting the malicious website. This issue was fixed in version 1.6.0. |
| CVE-2026-116072 | Medium | 2026-10-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Infinity for Reddit through 8.3.4 contains a login cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to log victims into an attacker-controlled account because the exported LoginChromeCustomTabActivity redirect handler checks a hardcoded OAuth state value. Attackers can authorize the app's client ID with their own Reddit account, then deliver an infinity://localhost redirect containing their code and the constant state, causing the victim's posts, messages, and browsing to occur on the attacker's account. |
| CVE-2026-116052 | Medium | 2026-10-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A security flaw has been discovered in LinkStackOrg LinkStack up to 4.8.8. The affected element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-96388 | Medium | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Tawk.to - Live chat application allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Tawk.to - Live chat application versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.0.4. |
| CVE-2026-96374 | Medium | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Project Browser allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Project Browser versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.0.3, from 2.1.0 to 2.1.5. |
| CVE-2026-115494 | Medium | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw in the cross-site request forgery (CSRF) prevention of KNIME Business Hub prior to version 1.19.0 allows an authenticated attacker to perform a CSRF attack with passive user interaction. This means the state of a resource could be changed without the user noticing. As a workaround, an API gateway for firewall in front of KNIME Business Hub could remove the X-Forwaded-For header from all incoming requests. |
| CVE-2026-114719 | Medium | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a CSRF validation bypass in the mark-as-junk action of the markasjunk plugin. The plugin read the _uid parameter from POST data but passed it to rcmail::get_uids() without constraining the input mode, so values re-read inside that helper could be taken from the query string and the action carried out without a valid CSRF token. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix CSRF validation bypass in the mark-as-junk action”, which passes rcube_utils::INPUT_POST explicitly. |
| CVE-2026-86611 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Download Manager WordPress plugin before 3.3.71, Download Manager WordPress plugin before 7.5.9 does not have CSRF checks in some places, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin update its privacy and storage settings via a crafted link, including the credential that gates its unauthenticated maintenance endpoint. |
| CVE-2026-76297 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, an unauthenticated user could trick a user that holds a role with the edit_federated_providers capability into turning off all federated search providers. Successful exploitation could temporarily prevent federated searches from retrieving data from remote datasets. The vulnerability is possible because the federated provider Representational State Transfer (REST) API accepts GET requests for actions that change provider state. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the affected user by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The unauthenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. For more information see Run federated searches over remote Splunk platform deployments (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/federated-search/10.6/run-federated-searches-across-other-splunk-deployments/run-federated-searches-over-remote-splunk-platform-deployments) and Define roles on the Splunk platform with capabilities (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.4/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/define-roles-on-the-splunk-platform-with-capabilities) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-114470 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery in the REST API of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote attacker to make an authenticated user's browser perform a state-changing request. The REST API accepts HTTP Basic authentication and answers a browser with a Basic sign-in box; a browser caches the credential once the box is answered and sends it with later requests to that origin, including a top-level form post from another site, and the server reads a request body whatever its declared content type. The cross-site protection covered only the cookie session (a header a cross-site form cannot set, and a SameSite=Strict cookie); HTTP Basic was not held to it. A page under an attacker's control, visited by a user whose browser holds a cached Basic credential for the REST API - typically an administrator who signed in through the box - could therefore cause a state-changing request such as creating a domain, an account or an API key, or changing a setting, with the victim's credential. The attacker cannot read the cross-origin response, so the forgery is blind. |
| CVE-2026-114093 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Trigger.dev before 4.5.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to log out authenticated users by sending a link to the GET-based /logout endpoint. Attackers can lure victims into clicking an obfuscated, URL-encoded link that terminates their session, causing loss of unsaved work. |
| CVE-2026-114072 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Trigger.dev webapp before 4.5.12 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its organization-level Slack OAuth flow, which uses the organization ID as the OAuth state without binding it to the initiating session. Attackers who know a target organization ID can trick an authenticated member into opening an unredeemed /integrations/slack/callback URL, connecting an attacker-controlled Slack workspace that may receive the organization's operational alerts. |
| CVE-2026-114048 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | WWBN AVideo before 24.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in legacy endpoints like playlistStatus.php that bypass the .json.php-only autoCSRFGuard() check. Attackers can lure logged-in users to a page with an auto-submitting form to make private playlists public, remove playlist videos, or forge video suggestions. |
| CVE-2026-113796 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Electron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. Prior to versions 42.11.3, 43.7.0, 44.3.0, and 45.0.0-alpha.6, Electron treated pages opened into a new window from links as application-initiated navigations instead of preserving the page containing the link as the initiator. The resulting top-level request could be classified as same-site, causing SameSite=Strict cookies to be sent and Sec-Fetch-Site not to identify the initiating page. An application that loads untrusted content and permits it to open new windows could therefore allow that content to make a credentialed request to another site that relies on SameSite cookies for CSRF protection. This issue is fixed in versions 42.11.3, 43.7.0, 44.3.0, and 45.0.0-alpha.6. |
| CVE-2026-111401 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tailored Media Tailored Tools tailored-tools allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Tailored Tools: from n/a through 3.0.3. |
| CVE-2026-91555 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle BI Publisher product of Oracle Analytics (component: Web Server). Supported versions that are affected are 8.2.0.0.0, 12.2.1.4.0 and 26.01.0.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle BI Publisher. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle BI Publisher, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle BI Publisher accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle BI Publisher accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-91246 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Portal product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Runtime Tools). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Portal. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle WebCenter Portal, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle WebCenter Portal accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle WebCenter Portal accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101595 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Supply Chain Relationship Mgmt). The supported version that is affected is 6.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101574 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Helidon product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: OIDC). Supported versions that are affected are 4.0.0-4.5.5 and 27.0.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Helidon. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Helidon, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Helidon accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Helidon accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.9 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101558 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Purchasing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Approvals). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Purchasing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Purchasing, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Purchasing accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Purchasing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101547 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Demand Planning product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1 and 12.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Demand Planning. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Demand Planning, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Demand Planning accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Demand Planning accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101492 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Integration product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Open Integration). Supported versions that are affected are 25.12-26.9. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM Integration. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Siebel CRM Integration, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Siebel CRM Integration accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Siebel CRM Integration accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101408 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Siebel Apps - Marketing product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Email Marketing). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel Apps - Marketing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Siebel Apps - Marketing, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Siebel Apps - Marketing accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Siebel Apps - Marketing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101393 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Siebel Apps - Marketing product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Marketing). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel Apps - Marketing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Siebel Apps - Marketing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-84178 | Medium | 2026-10-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel OAuth component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.11.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. The authorization code callback did not carry a state parameter binding it to the authorization request that started the flow, and the callback did not verify one. An authorization code obtained in any browser could therefore be redeemed at the callback and associated with whichever session presented it, which is login cross-site request forgery: a victim can be silently signed in as an identity the attacker controls, so that actions the victim then performs, and data they then submit, land in the attacker's account. The same unvalidated callback handling also allowed the post-authentication redirect target to be influenced, giving an open redirect from a trusted origin. The state check runs before the authorization code is redeemed, so these paths are reachable without any interaction with the identity provider. Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. Users on the 4.22.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. The authorization request now issues a state value bound to the session, and the callback rejects a request whose state is absent or does not match, stopping the route with a 400 response. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, terminate the authorization code flow in a component that performs its own state binding rather than relying on the Camel callback. Note that after upgrading, a deployment behind a proxy that drops or rewrites the callback query string will begin to see 400 responses, because the state parameter must survive the round trip. |
| CVE-2026-111883 | Medium | 2026-10-19 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Locust through 2.46.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to stop load tests or reset statistics via GET requests to /stop and /stats/reset. Attackers can lure an operator to a malicious page triggering cross-site GET requests, terminating running swarms and wiping recorded performance results. |
| CVE-2026-110008 | Medium | 2026-10-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | @fastify/oauth2 is a Fastify wrapper for OAuth2 login flows. In versions 7.2.0 through 8.3.1, the state and code-verifier cookies are set without a Path attribute at a login route with two or more path segments, while the clearing step at the OAuth callback writes them with a root path, so the original cookies survive the callback and the documented single-use guarantee for the state value does not hold. A state value an attacker learns stays valid for the rest of the browser session, letting the attacker drive their own authorization flow in the victim's browser and sign the victim in to the attacker's account (login CSRF). The issue is fixed in @fastify/oauth2 8.3.2, and users should upgrade to 8.3.2 or later. As a workaround, set an explicit cookie path so the set and the clear name the same cookie. |
| CVE-2026-111988 | Medium | 2026-10-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A security flaw has been discovered in dyad-sh dyad up to 1.16.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component OAuth Callback Handler. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 1.17.0-beta.1 can resolve this issue. The patch is named 39fbae87b38573616a1a3b152cdb292787bb1109. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. |
| CVE-2026-104627 | Medium | 2026-10-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Gitea OpenID association callback in the security settings accepted a positive OpenID 2.0 assertion without checking that the signed-in user had started the linking. Because OpenID 2.0 allows unsolicited assertions, an attacker-controlled OpenID provider could attach the attacker's identity to the account of a signed-in victim who opened a crafted link, and the attacker could then sign in as the victim through OpenID login, which does not apply the local TOTP or WebAuthn checks. The callback now requires a time-limited `state` value bound to the user. |
| CVE-2026-92978 | Medium | 2026-10-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The User Registration & Membership – Free & Paid Memberships, Subscriptions, Content Restriction, User Profile, Custom User Registration & Login Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.8 This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the trigger_bulk_action function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force administrators to approve pending user registrations or deny arbitrary user accounts, locking targeted users out of the site via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. An attacker can bypass the earlier nonce check in trigger_query_actions() by supplying an empty new_role parameter, which causes that handler to return early and cede control to the unprotected trigger_bulk_action() handler; the exit() call at the end of that handler additionally prevents WordPress core's own bulk-users nonce validation from executing. |
| CVE-2026-92433 | Medium | 2026-10-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Patreon WordPress plugin before 1.10.0 does not verify a nonce when connecting the site to a Patreon account, allowing attackers to make a logged-in administrator re-link the integration to an attacker-controlled account via a crafted request (CSRF), taking over the site's Patreon integration. |
| CVE-2026-62322 | Medium | 2026-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Python Social Auth is a social authentication/registration mechanism. Prior to 5.0.2, the LINE backend exchanges an authorization code without validating the returned OAuth state. An attacker can begin authorization for an attacker-controlled LINE account and induce a victim to visit the resulting callback URL, causing the application to log the victim into the attacker's account. When account linking is enabled, the same missing validation can link the attacker's LINE identity to the victim's existing account and create a persistent unauthorized login path. Only applications with the LINE backend enabled are affected. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.2. |
| CVE-2026-89279 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AuthTake Technology Inc. Authtake allows Encryption Brute Forcing. This issue affects authtake: from v1.3 before v1.4. |
| CVE-2026-103076 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGrill User Registration user-registration allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects User Registration: from n/a through 5.2.8. |
| CVE-2026-84166 | Medium | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Hotel Booking WordPress plugin through 3.8 does not implement CSRF protection on its administrative booking order management, allowing attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into creating, deleting, or modifying arbitrary booking order records via a forged request. |
| CVE-2026-78358 | Medium | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Several administrative actions do not sufficiently validate whether a request was intentionally initiated by the authenticated user. In particular, the DBUpdateLogCleanUp action can be triggered through a GET request without validating a ChallengeToken. An unauthenticated remote attacker can therefore cause the browser of an authenticated administrator to execute the cleanup action by embedding a crafted request in a malicious web page. Successful exploitation can delete existing DBUpdate log entries. This may reduce the availability of diagnostic and historical information used for troubleshooting and auditing. The impact is limited to DBUpdate log entries that exist at the time the forged request is processed. Additional administrative endpoints were identified that do not validate a ChallengeToken. Some of these endpoints can trigger administrative actions such as deploying or synchronizing already existing configuration. They do not allow an attacker to introduce arbitrary new configuration through the CSRF request itself. Export and read-only endpoints were also identified without ChallengeToken validation. While these endpoints may be triggered through a forged cross-site request, the response content remains subject to the browser's same-origin restrictions and is not automatically exposed to the attacker. Therefore, no direct confidentiality impact has been demonstrated for these endpoints. This issue affects OTRS: * 7.0.X * 8.0.X * 2023.X * 2024.X * 2025.X * 2026.X before 2026.7.X Please note that ((OTRS)) Community Edition 6.x and before are vulnerable. Products based on the ((OTRS)) Community Edition also very likely to be affected |
| CVE-2026-54459 | Medium | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | FileRise is a self-hosted web-based file manager with multi-file upload, editing, and batch operations. Prior to 3.14.0, FileRise authenticates requests to the file creation and share-link creation handlers but does not enforce the server-side CSRF token check used by adjacent state-changing operations. The POST endpoints /api/file/createFile.php and /api/file/createShareLink.php invoke FileController::createFile and FileController::createShareLink without rejecting a missing or invalid X-CSRF-Token header. A request issued with a logged-in user's session can create an empty file or create a share link with that user's permissions, although the default SameSite=Lax session cookie reduces ordinary cross-site POST reachability. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.0. |
| CVE-2026-48211 | Medium | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated administrator can be induced to delete administrative Import/Export templates through a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. The OTRS AdminImportExport::TemplateDelete action does not validate the request's ChallengeToken, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to craft a malicious request that is executed with the privileges of an active administrator session. This issue affects OTRS: * 7.0.X * 8.0.X * 2023.X * 2024.X * 2025.X * 2026.X before 2026.7.X Please note that ((OTRS)) Community Edition 6.x and before are vulnerable. Products based on the ((OTRS)) Community Edition also very likely to be affected |
| CVE-2026-108800 | Medium | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was identified in yangzongzhuan RuoYi 4.8.3. The affected element is an unknown function. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2022-51020 | Medium | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Flower before 2.2.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability because Tornado xsrf_cookies is disabled and the OAuth session cookie lacks SameSite. Attackers can lure authenticated users to malicious pages that POST to /api/worker/shutdown, /api/worker/pool/restart, or /api/task/revoke to shut down Celery workers, resize pools, and revoke tasks. |
| CVE-2026-85348 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The GDPR Data Request Form WordPress plugin through 1.7.1 does not have CSRF protection when updating one of its settings, allowing attackers to change that setting via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| CVE-2026-107831 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Jivejdon through 5.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to perform state-changing actions by abusing GET endpoints lacking anti-CSRF tokens. Attackers can lure authenticated users to crafted links targeting /account/protected/delAll, /account/protected/sub/delSub, or /message/updateAction to delete private messages and subscriptions or rename threads. |
| CVE-2026-105260 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Database Addon For WPForms ( wpforms entries ) WordPress plugin before 1.1.1 does not verify the CSRF nonce when the field is omitted and performs no capability check of its own, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary stored form entries by tricking a logged-in administrator into loading a crafted page. |
| CVE-2026-45161 | Medium | 2026-10-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. Prior to version 2.6, the `trainer_login` view in wger accepts GET requests and executes `django_login()` without any CSRF protection, because Django's `CsrfViewMiddleware` only enforces tokens on unsafe methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE). An attacker can embed a single `<img>` tag on a malicious page; when an authenticated trainer loads that page, their browser auto-issues the GET with the session cookie, forcibly rebinding the trainer's session to an arbitrary user account. Version 2.6 fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-106216 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery in ReadingList in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| CVE-2026-105292 | Medium | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Chaterm before 0.12.1 contains a login cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to inject login state by sending chaterm:// callbacks without OAuth state validation. Attackers can trigger a crafted callback with attacker-controlled userInfo from a web page, signing the victim into the attacker's account so default data sync uploads saved hosts, passwords, and private keys. |
| CVE-2026-102778 | Medium | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Joomla Extension - svenbluege.de - Cross-site scripting and open redirect on the share mini page in Event Gallery extension < 6.6.0 - The page a shared image link opens (the share mini page of the front end) can link the article the image was shared from when the option "Share article links" is on. It took the address of the article from the shared link and printed it into the page without checking or escaping it; with the link type "Image Page with Redirect" it followed the address at once. A prepared link could therefore run a script in the page, in the session of the visitor who opened it, or send the visitor to another web site. Nothing on the server is changed or read by the server. |
| CVE-2026-102776 | Medium | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Joomla Extension - svenbluege.de - Cross-site request forgery of list tasks of the backend in Event Gallery extension < 6.6.0 - Eight tasks which the buttons of the back-end lists call did not check the form token: setting the default payment method, shipping method, image type set, order status and watermark; putting an event into the shop or taking it out; choosing the main image of an event and whether an image is shown only as the main image; and sorting the images of an event. A prepared page on another web site could trigger them in the name of a logged in administrator and change those settings and flags. Nothing can be deleted or read this way; orders are not affected. |
| CVE-2026-104453 | Medium | 2026-10-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the admintag action that allows attackers to delete tag associations by luring administrators to crafted GET links. Attackers can supply a wide id range in the delete_tag parameter via top-level navigation, carrying the SameSite=Lax admin cookie, to bulk-delete tag triples. |
| CVE-2026-104452 | Medium | 2026-10-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the filemanager page handler, which deletes page attachments on GET requests without validating a CSRF token. Attackers can lure a logged-in page owner or administrator into a top-level GET navigation with do=del, erase, or emptytrash, deleting or permanently purging the page's attachments. |