Overview 9,977 matches · 488 in Waratek scope · 6 protected · 33 exploited · 6 CISA KEV · 521 public PoC · 12 EPSS ≥ 0.5
9,977matches
488in Waratek scope4.9%
6protected0.1%
33exploited0.3%
6CISA KEV0.1%
521public PoC5.2%
12EPSS ≥ 0.50.1%
Protected by Waratek
6
0.1%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
8
0.1%
No exploit published
474
4.8%
Outside Waratek scope
76
0.8%
Not applicable
9,413
94.3%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
6
0.1%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9,971
99.9%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 1,922 / year
20021
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20030
20044
Not applicable4
High3
Medium1
not blocked4
Working exploit published3
No public exploit1
20054
Not applicable4
Medium4
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20063
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
200737
No exploit published2
Not applicable35
High3
Medium34
not blocked37
Working exploit published8
No public exploit29
200878
Not applicable78
High11
Medium64
Low3
not blocked78
Exploited1
Working exploit published10
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit66
2009113
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published1
Not applicable111
High4
Medium109
not blocked113
Working exploit published33
No public exploit80
201075
No exploit published3
Not applicable72
High1
Medium71
Low3
not blocked75
Working exploit published24
No public exploit51
201155
Mitigation candidate1
Not applicable54
High1
Medium54
not blocked55
Working exploit published12
No public exploit43
2012155
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable150
High1
Medium153
Low1
not blocked155
Exploited1
Working exploit published47
No public exploit107
2013121
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable108
High5
Medium116
not blocked121
Working exploit published31
No public exploit90
2014247
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope7
Not applicable233
High2
Medium244
Low1
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked243
Working exploit published64
Forecast only2
No public exploit181
2015241
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope9
Not applicable228
High12
Medium229
not blocked241
Exploited2
Working exploit published43
No public exploit196
201682
No exploit published7
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable71
Critical2
High70
Medium8
Low2
not blocked82
Exploited2
Working exploit published6
No public exploit74
2017315
No exploit published21
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable289
Critical5
High276
Medium33
Low1
not blocked315
Working exploit published52
No public exploit263
2018453
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published13
Outside Waratek scope10
Not applicable429
Critical4
High370
Medium79
not blocked453
Exploited2
Working exploit published60
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit389
2019543
No exploit published64
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable474
Critical8
High366
Medium169
not blocked543
Exploited4
Working exploit published36
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit501
2020399
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published27
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable368
Critical4
High238
Medium155
Low2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked398
Exploited3
Working exploit published20
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit375
2021468
No exploit published27
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable437
Critical11
High239
Medium214
Low4
not blocked468
Exploited3
Working exploit published12
Proof of concept only5
No public exploit448
2022704
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published70
Outside Waratek scope13
Not applicable619
Critical8
High315
Medium376
Low5
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked703
Exploited5
Working exploit published13
Proof of concept only94
Forecast only1
No public exploit591
20231,304
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published92
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1,210
Critical18
High922
Medium358
Low6
not blocked1,304
Exploited3
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only130
No public exploit1,168
20241,423
No exploit published25
Outside Waratek scope7
Not applicable1,391
Critical35
High646
Medium723
Low19
not blocked1,423
Exploited2
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only414
No public exploit1,003
20251,922
No exploit published31
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1,890
Critical34
High754
Medium1,081
Low53
not blocked1,922
Exploited4
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only235
No public exploit1,679
20261,230
No exploit published76
Not applicable1,154
Critical37
High381
Medium711
Low101
not blocked1,230
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only266
No public exploit962
2002200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-117536 | High | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | REDAXO before 5.21.3 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the backend user administration page (users/users) because the CSRF token check only runs when the save parameter is set, while the update path triggered by FUNC_UPDATE does not require it. Attackers can lure a logged-in backend user with the users[] permission to a crafted GET link to grant administrator rights, deactivate accounts, or lock out the sole administrator. |
| CVE-2026-117534 | Medium | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | REDAXO before 5.21.3 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the structure/history plugin that allows attackers to delete history or roll back content via unvalidated GET requests. Attackers can lure logged-in backend users to a page triggering func=clearall or rex_history_function=snap, permanently deleting all article snapshots or reverting articles to earlier states. |
| CVE-2026-116895 | Medium | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | REDAXO before 5.21.5 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability because the backend processes the safemode GET parameter in index.php without validating a CSRF token. Attackers can lure a logged-in administrator into opening a crafted link to disable global safe mode, writing safe_mode: false to config.yml, or enable session safe mode, disabling backend addons. |
| CVE-2026-116880 | High | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Semantic MediaWiki from 3.0.0 before 7.3.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Special:SMWAdmin because it overwrites the wpEditToken with a freshly generated valid token. Attackers can lure an authenticated smw-admin user to a malicious page that triggers schema setup, entity-disposal, or job actions, causing semantic data loss and resource exhaustion. |
| CVE-2026-116863 | Critical | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tribulant Software Newsletters newsletters-lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Newsletters: from n/a through 4.18.2. |
| CVE-2026-116839 | High | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A malicious actor who lures an authenticated user to a malicious page could exploit a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability found in airMAX M devices to make unauthorized changes and execute a Denial of Service (DoS) attack on the device. |
| CVE-2026-116838 | High | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A malicious actor who lures an authenticated user to a malicious page could exploit a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability found in airMAX M devices to execute a Command Injection on the device. |
| CVE-2026-102787 | Medium | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Joomla Extension - phoca.cz - CSRF in category management in Phoca Download 3.1.0 - 6.1.5 |
| CVE-2026-97295 | Medium | 2026-10-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in David Lingren Media LIbrary Assistant media-library-assistant allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Media LIbrary Assistant: from n/a through 3.42. |
| CVE-2026-77058 | Medium | 2026-10-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | boneIO Black is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on all state-changing API endpoints because it lacks CSRF tokens and does not validate Origin or Referer headers. A remote attacker can craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by a user on the internal network, sends cross-origin requests to the device. This allows the attacker to reboot the controller, toggle relay circuits, control gates and blinds, or shut down the device, causing loss of integrity and availability. Critically, due to CVE-2026-77053 (authentication disabled by default), any user on the same internal network can trigger attacker-controlled actions by visiting the malicious website. This issue was fixed in version 1.6.0. |
| CVE-2026-116210 | High | 2026-10-26 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Webasyst Framework through 4.4.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the Photos app that allows remote attackers to perform backend actions because the app does not enable the framework's opt-in CSRF check. Attackers can lure logged-in Photos users to a malicious page that submits forged POST requests to photo/delete, album/save, photo/manageAccessSave or photo/saveField, deleting photos and changing access rights. |
| CVE-2026-111841 | High | 2026-10-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aman FunnelKit Automations wp-marketing-automations allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects FunnelKit Automations: from n/a through 3.8.5.2. |
| CVE-2026-116204 | High | 2026-10-25 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | YesWiki before 4.7.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the despam action (tools/security/actions/despam.php) that lets unauthenticated attackers delete or restore pages through an administrator's session. Attackers can plant an auto-submitting raw HTML form on a wiki page, so an administrator who views it posts clean, suppr[], or rev[] parameters that delete PagePrincipale, configuration pages, or overwrite current content. |
| CVE-2026-116072 | Medium | 2026-10-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Infinity for Reddit through 8.3.4 contains a login cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to log victims into an attacker-controlled account because the exported LoginChromeCustomTabActivity redirect handler checks a hardcoded OAuth state value. Attackers can authorize the app's client ID with their own Reddit account, then deliver an infinity://localhost redirect containing their code and the constant state, causing the victim's posts, messages, and browsing to occur on the attacker's account. |
| CVE-2026-116052 | Medium | 2026-10-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A security flaw has been discovered in LinkStackOrg LinkStack up to 4.8.8. The affected element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-93631 | High | 2026-10-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the OAuth extension of Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Network Edition allows an attacker to link an attacker-controlled external account to a victim's mailbox. The OAuth callback does not bind its state value or authorization code to the initiating Zimbra session and instead selects the destination mailbox from the browser's current authentication cookie. On a deployment with the provider configured, an attacker can induce a signed-in victim to load a callback containing a fresh code for the attacker's provider account. This creates a persistent data source that imports attacker-controlled contacts or events. With bidirectional CalDAV synchronization, appointments subsequently created or edited in the linked calendar are also disclosed to the attacker. ZCS 10.1.16 and 10.1.20 are affected. |
| CVE-2026-75779 | High | 2026-10-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (“OS Command Injection”) and Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in an ASUS router model allow an attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into visiting a phishing website, causing the router to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Refer to the ' Security Update for ASUS Router Firmware ' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information. |
| CVE-2026-58497 | High | 2026-10-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Uni-CLI gives people and agents one command interface for websites, browsers, desktop applications, local tools, and MCP. Prior to version 0.225.2, Uni-CLI exposed the legacy JSON-RPC-over-HTTP MCP transport on loopback without validating browser Origin headers before routing requests. A malicious web page could send a CORS simple POST request, such as text/plain, to the local /mcp endpoint and deliver a JSON-RPC body to the dispatcher. If the user had started the local MCP HTTP transport, that page could drive tools/call requests against the user's local Uni-CLI server. The Streamable HTTP transport already enforced this browser-to-localhost boundary. The legacy stateless HTTP path did not, so the two HTTP transports had drifted. This issue is about the browser-to-localhost boundary; it does not change Uni-CLI's local-code-execution trust model. This issue has been patched in version 0.225.2. |
| CVE-2026-115796 | Low | 2026-10-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda F6 12.02.01.73. This impacts an unknown function of the component Web Management Interface. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. |
| CVE-2026-96388 | Medium | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Tawk.to - Live chat application allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Tawk.to - Live chat application versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.0.4. |
| CVE-2026-96374 | Medium | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Project Browser allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Project Browser versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.0.3, from 2.1.0 to 2.1.5. |
| CVE-2026-115494 | Medium | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw in the cross-site request forgery (CSRF) prevention of KNIME Business Hub prior to version 1.19.0 allows an authenticated attacker to perform a CSRF attack with passive user interaction. This means the state of a resource could be changed without the user noticing. As a workaround, an API gateway for firewall in front of KNIME Business Hub could remove the X-Forwaded-For header from all incoming requests. |
| CVE-2026-114719 | Medium | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a CSRF validation bypass in the mark-as-junk action of the markasjunk plugin. The plugin read the _uid parameter from POST data but passed it to rcmail::get_uids() without constraining the input mode, so values re-read inside that helper could be taken from the query string and the action carried out without a valid CSRF token. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix CSRF validation bypass in the mark-as-junk action”, which passes rcube_utils::INPUT_POST explicitly. |
| CVE-2026-114662 | High | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Obot before 0.26.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the CLI login flow that allows unauthenticated attackers to steal API keys by choosing token request IDs. Attackers can create a token request via POST /api/token-request, send the login link to a signed-in user, and fetch the resulting non-expiring API key to take over the victim's account. |
| CVE-2026-114177 | High | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Xpro Xpro Elementor Addons xpro-elementor-addons allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Xpro Elementor Addons: from n/a through 1.7.10. |
| CVE-2026-86611 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Download Manager WordPress plugin before 3.3.71, Download Manager WordPress plugin before 7.5.9 does not have CSRF checks in some places, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin update its privacy and storage settings via a crafted link, including the credential that gates its unauthenticated maintenance endpoint. |
| CVE-2026-76297 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, an unauthenticated user could trick a user that holds a role with the edit_federated_providers capability into turning off all federated search providers. Successful exploitation could temporarily prevent federated searches from retrieving data from remote datasets. The vulnerability is possible because the federated provider Representational State Transfer (REST) API accepts GET requests for actions that change provider state. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the affected user by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The unauthenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. For more information see Run federated searches over remote Splunk platform deployments (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/federated-search/10.6/run-federated-searches-across-other-splunk-deployments/run-federated-searches-over-remote-splunk-platform-deployments) and Define roles on the Splunk platform with capabilities (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.4/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/define-roles-on-the-splunk-platform-with-capabilities) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-114470 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery in the REST API of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote attacker to make an authenticated user's browser perform a state-changing request. The REST API accepts HTTP Basic authentication and answers a browser with a Basic sign-in box; a browser caches the credential once the box is answered and sends it with later requests to that origin, including a top-level form post from another site, and the server reads a request body whatever its declared content type. The cross-site protection covered only the cookie session (a header a cross-site form cannot set, and a SameSite=Strict cookie); HTTP Basic was not held to it. A page under an attacker's control, visited by a user whose browser holds a cached Basic credential for the REST API - typically an administrator who signed in through the box - could therefore cause a state-changing request such as creating a domain, an account or an API key, or changing a setting, with the victim's credential. The attacker cannot read the cross-origin response, so the forgery is blind. |
| CVE-2026-114093 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Trigger.dev before 4.5.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to log out authenticated users by sending a link to the GET-based /logout endpoint. Attackers can lure victims into clicking an obfuscated, URL-encoded link that terminates their session, causing loss of unsaved work. |
| CVE-2026-114089 | High | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Trigger.dev before 4.5.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the CLI authorization-code flow because loading /account/authorization-code/<code> mints a Personal Access Token without any consent step. Attackers mint an unauthenticated code, lure a logged-in user to that URL, then retrieve the victim's PAT from the unauthenticated /api/v1/token endpoint to take over the account. |
| CVE-2026-114072 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Trigger.dev webapp before 4.5.12 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its organization-level Slack OAuth flow, which uses the organization ID as the OAuth state without binding it to the initiating session. Attackers who know a target organization ID can trick an authenticated member into opening an unredeemed /integrations/slack/callback URL, connecting an attacker-controlled Slack workspace that may receive the organization's operational alerts. |
| CVE-2026-114048 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | WWBN AVideo before 24.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in legacy endpoints like playlistStatus.php that bypass the .json.php-only autoCSRFGuard() check. Attackers can lure logged-in users to a page with an auto-submitting form to make private playlists public, remove playlist videos, or forge video suggestions. |
| CVE-2026-113796 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Electron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. Prior to versions 42.11.3, 43.7.0, 44.3.0, and 45.0.0-alpha.6, Electron treated pages opened into a new window from links as application-initiated navigations instead of preserving the page containing the link as the initiator. The resulting top-level request could be classified as same-site, causing SameSite=Strict cookies to be sent and Sec-Fetch-Site not to identify the initiating page. An application that loads untrusted content and permits it to open new windows could therefore allow that content to make a credentialed request to another site that relies on SameSite cookies for CSRF protection. This issue is fixed in versions 42.11.3, 43.7.0, 44.3.0, and 45.0.0-alpha.6. |
| CVE-2026-111401 | Medium | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tailored Media Tailored Tools tailored-tools allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Tailored Tools: from n/a through 3.0.3. |
| CVE-2026-107127 | High | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Uncanny Toolkit for LearnDash WordPress plugin before 3.8.2 does not validate the origin of a password-reset request, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to set the password of a user who is partway through a password reset to an attacker-chosen value through a forged request, resulting in full account takeover. |
| CVE-2026-91555 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle BI Publisher product of Oracle Analytics (component: Web Server). Supported versions that are affected are 8.2.0.0.0, 12.2.1.4.0 and 26.01.0.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle BI Publisher. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle BI Publisher, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle BI Publisher accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle BI Publisher accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-91393 | Low | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM End User product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Open UI). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM End User. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Siebel CRM End User accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.1 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-91300 | Low | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: Web Runtime SEC). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.1 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-91246 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Portal product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Runtime Tools). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Portal. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle WebCenter Portal, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle WebCenter Portal accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle WebCenter Portal accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-87408 | High | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Applications Framework product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Personalization). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Applications Framework. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Applications Framework, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Applications Framework accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Applications Framework accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-86467 | High | 2026-10-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Apache Airflow Amazon provider: the AWS auth manager's SAML login flow does not bind the authentication response to the browser that began it. The login handler discards the AuthnRequest ID and the callback validates the assertion without requiring a matching InResponseTo, so an unauthenticated attacker who can cause a victim to load a page can complete a SAML login in the victim's browser using the attacker's own assertion, silently logging the victim into the attacker's Airflow account. Subsequent work the victim performs lands in a session the attacker controls. Affects deployments using the AWS auth manager with SAML authentication. The victim needs only to visit an attacker-controlled page; no Airflow account or credential is required of the attacker. This is the same login-CSRF class fixed in the Keycloak auth manager as CVE-2026-40948. Users of apache-airflow-providers-amazon are recommended to upgrade to version 9.38.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-112836 | High | 2026-10-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in e4jvikwp VikRentCar vikrentcar allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects VikRentCar: from n/a through 1.4.8. |
| CVE-2026-101595 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Supply Chain Relationship Mgmt). The supported version that is affected is 6.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101574 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Helidon product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: OIDC). Supported versions that are affected are 4.0.0-4.5.5 and 27.0.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Helidon. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Helidon, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Helidon accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Helidon accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.9 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101558 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Purchasing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Approvals). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Purchasing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Purchasing, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Purchasing accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Purchasing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101547 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Demand Planning product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1 and 12.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Demand Planning. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Demand Planning, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Demand Planning accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Demand Planning accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101504 | High | 2026-10-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in Oracle Trusted Answer Search (component: Application expert UI). The supported version that is affected is 26.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Trusted Answer Search. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Trusted Answer Search, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Trusted Answer Search accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Trusted Answer Search accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.6 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101495 | High | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Development product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Siebel Approval Manager). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM Development. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Siebel CRM Development. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-101492 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Integration product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Open Integration). Supported versions that are affected are 25.12-26.9. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM Integration. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Siebel CRM Integration, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Siebel CRM Integration accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Siebel CRM Integration accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101451 | High | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Siebel Life Sciences product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Web UI). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel Life Sciences. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Siebel Life Sciences, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Siebel Life Sciences accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Siebel Life Sciences accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101447 | High | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Development product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Workflow). Supported versions that are affected are 25.12-26.9. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM Development. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Siebel CRM Development. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-101408 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Siebel Apps - Marketing product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Email Marketing). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel Apps - Marketing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Siebel Apps - Marketing, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Siebel Apps - Marketing accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Siebel Apps - Marketing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101393 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Siebel Apps - Marketing product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Marketing). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel Apps - Marketing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Siebel Apps - Marketing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-84178 | Medium | 2026-10-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel OAuth component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.11.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. The authorization code callback did not carry a state parameter binding it to the authorization request that started the flow, and the callback did not verify one. An authorization code obtained in any browser could therefore be redeemed at the callback and associated with whichever session presented it, which is login cross-site request forgery: a victim can be silently signed in as an identity the attacker controls, so that actions the victim then performs, and data they then submit, land in the attacker's account. The same unvalidated callback handling also allowed the post-authentication redirect target to be influenced, giving an open redirect from a trusted origin. The state check runs before the authorization code is redeemed, so these paths are reachable without any interaction with the identity provider. Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. Users on the 4.22.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. The authorization request now issues a state value bound to the session, and the callback rejects a request whose state is absent or does not match, stopping the route with a 400 response. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, terminate the authorization code flow in a component that performs its own state binding rather than relying on the Camel callback. Note that after upgrading, a deployment behind a proxy that drops or rewrites the callback query string will begin to see 400 responses, because the state parameter must survive the round trip. |
| CVE-2026-112033 | Low | 2026-10-19 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A security flaw has been discovered in aircheng-org iWebShop-5 up to 5.16. The affected element is the function admin_repwd/admin_repwd_act of the file controllers/system.php of the component Password Change. The manipulation of the argument password/repassword results in cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. |
| CVE-2026-111883 | Medium | 2026-10-19 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Locust through 2.46.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to stop load tests or reset statistics via GET requests to /stop and /stats/reset. Attackers can lure an operator to a malicious page triggering cross-site GET requests, terminating running swarms and wiping recorded performance results. |
| CVE-2026-110008 | Medium | 2026-10-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | @fastify/oauth2 is a Fastify wrapper for OAuth2 login flows. In versions 7.2.0 through 8.3.1, the state and code-verifier cookies are set without a Path attribute at a login route with two or more path segments, while the clearing step at the OAuth callback writes them with a root path, so the original cookies survive the callback and the documented single-use guarantee for the state value does not hold. A state value an attacker learns stays valid for the rest of the browser session, letting the attacker drive their own authorization flow in the victim's browser and sign the victim in to the attacker's account (login CSRF). The issue is fixed in @fastify/oauth2 8.3.2, and users should upgrade to 8.3.2 or later. As a workaround, set an explicit cookie path so the set and the clear name the same cookie. |
| CVE-2026-107084 | High | 2026-10-19 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Slims (Senayan Library Management Systems) 9 Bulian 9.8.0 allows cross-site request forgery (CSRF) against admin/modules/circulation/loan_history_maintenance.php because the action=run GET parameter performs privileged, destructive operations with no CSRF token or POST confirmation, leading to data loss of loan history records. |
| CVE-2026-112050 | Low | 2026-10-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Gitify before 7.10.0 contains a login cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to bind a victim's client to their account because performGitHubWebOAuth() omits OAuth state validation. Attackers can get a gitify://oauth?code= link with their own authorization code opened during a victim's pending login, causing Gitify to display attacker-controlled notifications as the victim's own. |
| CVE-2026-111988 | Medium | 2026-10-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A security flaw has been discovered in dyad-sh dyad up to 1.16.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component OAuth Callback Handler. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 1.17.0-beta.1 can resolve this issue. The patch is named 39fbae87b38573616a1a3b152cdb292787bb1109. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. |
| CVE-2026-107618 | High | 2026-10-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | `POST /{owner}/{repo}/topics` was registered without the sign-in middleware that provides the cross-origin protection, so a request issued by a third-party site was not rejected. A repository administrator who visited a malicious page could have the topics of their repository changed. No other repository settings were reachable through this route. |
| CVE-2026-104627 | Medium | 2026-10-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Gitea OpenID association callback in the security settings accepted a positive OpenID 2.0 assertion without checking that the signed-in user had started the linking. Because OpenID 2.0 allows unsolicited assertions, an attacker-controlled OpenID provider could attach the attacker's identity to the account of a signed-in victim who opened a crafted link, and the attacker could then sign in as the victim through OpenID login, which does not apply the local TOTP or WebAuthn checks. The callback now requires a time-limited `state` value bound to the user. |
| CVE-2026-92978 | Medium | 2026-10-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The User Registration & Membership – Free & Paid Memberships, Subscriptions, Content Restriction, User Profile, Custom User Registration & Login Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.8 This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the trigger_bulk_action function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force administrators to approve pending user registrations or deny arbitrary user accounts, locking targeted users out of the site via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. An attacker can bypass the earlier nonce check in trigger_query_actions() by supplying an empty new_role parameter, which causes that handler to return early and cede control to the unprotected trigger_bulk_action() handler; the exit() call at the end of that handler additionally prevents WordPress core's own bulk-users nonce validation from executing. |
| CVE-2026-92433 | Medium | 2026-10-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Patreon WordPress plugin before 1.10.0 does not verify a nonce when connecting the site to a Patreon account, allowing attackers to make a logged-in administrator re-link the integration to an attacker-controlled account via a crafted request (CSRF), taking over the site's Patreon integration. |
| CVE-2026-111907 | High | 2026-10-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | phpMyFAQ 4.0.0 before 4.1.9 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the POST /admin/api/update-database endpoint, which executes database migrations without validating a CSRF token. Attackers can lure a logged-in user with the CONFIGURATION_EDIT permission into submitting a crafted cross-site request, triggering migrations that may impact database integrity or availability. |
| CVE-2026-111906 | High | 2026-10-17 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | phpMyFAQ before 4.1.9 and 4.2.0-alpha before 4.2.0-beta contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the Elasticsearch and OpenSearch administration API endpoints, which do not validate a CSRF token for the create, drop, and import actions. Attackers can lure a user with CONFIGURATION_EDIT permission to a malicious page that triggers these actions, deleting search indexes, forcing re-indexing, or exhausting resources. |
| CVE-2026-49410 | High | 2026-10-16 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | OpenHuman is an open-source agent harness available as a desktop application and Rust library. Versions before 0.56.0 allow cross-site request forgery against the unauthenticated GET /auth/telegram loopback callback because telegram_auth_handler consumes an attacker-supplied one-time Telegram login token and passes the returned JWT to credentials::ops::store_session without validating browser fetch metadata or the request origin. An attacker with an OpenHuman account can cause a user with the local core running to visit a malicious page that requests the /auth/telegram endpoint on loopback port 7788, switching the user's active local session to the attacker's backend account and exposing subsequent agent actions, memory writes, and Telegram messages associated with that session to the attacker. This issue is fixed in version 0.56.0. |
| CVE-2026-111413 | High | 2026-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in aThemeArt aThemeArt Theme Helper athemeart-theme-helper allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects aThemeArt Theme Helper: from n/a through 1.0.8. |
| CVE-2026-110015 | High | 2026-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Salon Booking System WordPress plugin before 10.31.9 does not correctly verify the authenticity of REST API requests and discards WordPress core's nonce check for cookie-authenticated sessions across the whole REST API, allowing unauthenticated attackers who trick a logged-in administrator into clicking a crafted link to forge requests in that administrator's browser, up to creating a new administrator account. |
| CVE-2026-62322 | Medium | 2026-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Python Social Auth is a social authentication/registration mechanism. Prior to 5.0.2, the LINE backend exchanges an authorization code without validating the returned OAuth state. An attacker can begin authorization for an attacker-controlled LINE account and induce a victim to visit the resulting callback URL, causing the application to log the victim into the attacker's account. When account linking is enabled, the same missing validation can link the attacker's LINE identity to the victim's existing account and create a persistent unauthorized login path. Only applications with the LINE backend enabled are affected. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.2. |
| CVE-2026-106708 | High | 2026-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | XXL-JOB 3.5.0-SNAPSHOT and earlier contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the user management controller (JobUserController). The endpoints /user/insert, /user/update, and /user/delete lack CSRF protection and do not restrict HTTP method. |
| CVE-2026-89279 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AuthTake Technology Inc. Authtake allows Encryption Brute Forcing. This issue affects authtake: from v1.3 before v1.4. |
| CVE-2026-103076 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGrill User Registration user-registration allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects User Registration: from n/a through 5.2.8. |
| CVE-2026-85960 | High | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 use predictable CSRF tokens in Query Console. A remote attacker who lures an authenticated Query Console user to a malicious page could submit unauthorized requests and execute server-side code with the victim's permissions. |
| CVE-2026-84312 | High | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. Prior to 2.4.1, GetCasdoorUri uses the configured Casdoor application name as a constant OAuth state value and CasdoorCallback does not compare the submitted state with a value bound to the initiating browser session. An unauthenticated attacker can cause a victim's browser to complete an attacker-controlled Casdoor authorization flow, and the callback can mint a Nginx UI session for the identity returned by that authorization code. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.1. |
| CVE-2026-84166 | Medium | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Hotel Booking WordPress plugin through 3.8 does not implement CSRF protection on its administrative booking order management, allowing attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into creating, deleting, or modifying arbitrary booking order records via a forged request. |
| CVE-2026-78358 | Medium | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Several administrative actions do not sufficiently validate whether a request was intentionally initiated by the authenticated user. In particular, the DBUpdateLogCleanUp action can be triggered through a GET request without validating a ChallengeToken. An unauthenticated remote attacker can therefore cause the browser of an authenticated administrator to execute the cleanup action by embedding a crafted request in a malicious web page. Successful exploitation can delete existing DBUpdate log entries. This may reduce the availability of diagnostic and historical information used for troubleshooting and auditing. The impact is limited to DBUpdate log entries that exist at the time the forged request is processed. Additional administrative endpoints were identified that do not validate a ChallengeToken. Some of these endpoints can trigger administrative actions such as deploying or synchronizing already existing configuration. They do not allow an attacker to introduce arbitrary new configuration through the CSRF request itself. Export and read-only endpoints were also identified without ChallengeToken validation. While these endpoints may be triggered through a forged cross-site request, the response content remains subject to the browser's same-origin restrictions and is not automatically exposed to the attacker. Therefore, no direct confidentiality impact has been demonstrated for these endpoints. This issue affects OTRS: * 7.0.X * 8.0.X * 2023.X * 2024.X * 2025.X * 2026.X before 2026.7.X Please note that ((OTRS)) Community Edition 6.x and before are vulnerable. Products based on the ((OTRS)) Community Edition also very likely to be affected |
| CVE-2026-59977 | High | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ConvertX is a self-hosted file conversion service. Prior to 0.18.0, the /delete/{id} endpoint uses HTTP GET for permanent deletion without CSRF protection. If an authenticated user visits attacker-controlled content that requests /delete/{id}, the browser sends the user session cookie and the request deletes the targeted job, resulting in unauthorized loss of converted-file history. This issue is fixed in version 0.18.0. |
| CVE-2026-54459 | Medium | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | FileRise is a self-hosted web-based file manager with multi-file upload, editing, and batch operations. Prior to 3.14.0, FileRise authenticates requests to the file creation and share-link creation handlers but does not enforce the server-side CSRF token check used by adjacent state-changing operations. The POST endpoints /api/file/createFile.php and /api/file/createShareLink.php invoke FileController::createFile and FileController::createShareLink without rejecting a missing or invalid X-CSRF-Token header. A request issued with a logged-in user's session can create an empty file or create a share link with that user's permissions, although the default SameSite=Lax session cookie reduces ordinary cross-site POST reachability. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.0. |
| CVE-2026-48211 | Medium | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated administrator can be induced to delete administrative Import/Export templates through a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. The OTRS AdminImportExport::TemplateDelete action does not validate the request's ChallengeToken, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to craft a malicious request that is executed with the privileges of an active administrator session. This issue affects OTRS: * 7.0.X * 8.0.X * 2023.X * 2024.X * 2025.X * 2026.X before 2026.7.X Please note that ((OTRS)) Community Edition 6.x and before are vulnerable. Products based on the ((OTRS)) Community Edition also very likely to be affected |
| CVE-2026-108909 | Low | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A security flaw has been discovered in Netcore NR268 1.7.121109. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component CGI Endpoint. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-108800 | Medium | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was identified in yangzongzhuan RuoYi 4.8.3. The affected element is an unknown function. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-108481 | High | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Patreon Patreon WordPress patreon-connect allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Patreon WordPress: from n/a through 1.10.0. |
| CVE-2026-108479 | High | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Patreon Patreon WordPress patreon-connect allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Patreon WordPress: from n/a through 1.9.17. |
| CVE-2022-51020 | Medium | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Flower before 2.2.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability because Tornado xsrf_cookies is disabled and the OAuth session cookie lacks SameSite. Attackers can lure authenticated users to malicious pages that POST to /api/worker/shutdown, /api/worker/pool/restart, or /api/task/revoke to shut down Celery workers, resize pools, and revoke tasks. |
| CVE-2026-108738 | Low | 2026-10-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Traccar 5.7 through 6.16.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to log victims into attacker-controlled accounts because the OpenID Connect callback never validates the OAuth state parameter. Attackers can induce a victim's browser to load /api/session/openid/callback with their own authorization code, causing data the victim enters, such as registered devices, to land in the attacker's account. |
| CVE-2026-108553 | High | 2026-10-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenRefine through 3.10.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the get-rows command that allows remote attackers to execute Jython facet expressions. Attackers can lure a user to a malicious page issuing a cross-origin GET with a crafted engine parameter, executing operating system commands as the OpenRefine user. |
| CVE-2026-96671 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in fifu.app Featured Image from URL featured-image-from-url allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Featured Image from URL: from n/a through 6.0.7. |
| CVE-2026-85348 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The GDPR Data Request Form WordPress plugin through 1.7.1 does not have CSRF protection when updating one of its settings, allowing attackers to change that setting via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| CVE-2026-62026 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MIGHTYminnow Dashboard Notes dashboard-notes allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Dashboard Notes: from n/a through 1.0.3. |
| CVE-2026-107848 | Low | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Contao is an Open Source CMS. From version 4.0.0 until 5.3.50 and 5.7.12, RequestTokenListener validates REQUEST_TOKEN only for POST requests, while the declarative GET guard runs only when an act parameter is present. Backend actions dispatched through the key parameter can therefore execute without a CSRF token when an authenticated backend user loads an attacker-controlled URL. Reachable actions remain limited to modules available to that user, and the advisory demonstrates destructive or state-changing actions rather than privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in versions 5.3.50 and 5.7.12. |
| CVE-2026-107809 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. From 2.0.0 until 2.5.0, AuthRequired accepts a browser-managed token cookie as an API credential after the front end stores the JWT in that cookie. Because management endpoints do not universally require a CSRF token or perform Origin or Referer validation, a remote attacker can induce a logged-in administrator's browser to submit authenticated cross-site state-changing requests, including POST /api/configs. The attack requires an administrator account without OTP/Passkey or a target endpoint that does not require secure-session proof. The attacker cannot read the cross-origin response but can modify Nginx configuration, trigger reloads, or invoke other management operations reachable with the victim's session. This issue is fixed in version 2.5.0. |
| CVE-2026-78388 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. |
| CVE-2026-66479 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Liquid Web / StellarWP WPComplete wpcomplete allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WPComplete: from n/a through 2.9.5.6. |
| CVE-2026-62142 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Melapress WP 2FA wp-2fa allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP 2FA: from n/a through 4.1.0. |
| CVE-2026-107831 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Jivejdon through 5.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to perform state-changing actions by abusing GET endpoints lacking anti-CSRF tokens. Attackers can lure authenticated users to crafted links targeting /account/protected/delAll, /account/protected/sub/delSub, or /message/updateAction to delete private messages and subscriptions or rename threads. |
| CVE-2026-107337 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The Malcolm kiosk Flask application exposes a POST /script_call/<script> endpoint with zero authentication and wildcard CORS (CORS(app)). An attacker can force the operator's browser to execute arbitrary management commands via CSRF, including control.py --wipe which permanently deletes all captured network traffic and forensic logs, or control.py --stop which blinds the security monitoring. |
| CVE-2026-107295 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Pydantic AI is a Python agent framework for building applications and workflows with Generative AI. From 1.34.0 until 1.107.4 and 2.28.0, the Agent.to_web() and clai web development chat endpoint has missing request content-type validation. A website visited by a developer can submit a browser-compatible request to a loopback-hosted chat server, causing the served agent to run and execute tools with the privileges and credentials of the local process; client-relayed approval decisions also leave requires_approval=True tools exposed. Binding to localhost does not prevent a browser page from reaching the loopback address. This issue is fixed in versions 1.107.4 and 2.28.0. |
| CVE-2026-106611 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPMU DEV Forminator forminator allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Forminator: from n/a through 1.57.3. |
| CVE-2026-105260 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Database Addon For WPForms ( wpforms entries ) WordPress plugin before 1.1.1 does not verify the CSRF nonce when the field is omitted and performs no capability check of its own, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary stored form entries by tricking a logged-in administrator into loading a crafted page. |