Overview 535 matches · 62 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 4 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 4 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
535matches
62in Waratek scope11.6%
1protected0.2%
4exploited0.7%
1CISA KEV0.2%
4public PoC0.7%
1EPSS ≥ 0.50.2%
Protected by Waratek
1
0.2%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
61
11.4%
Outside Waratek scope
3
0.6%
Not applicable
470
87.9%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
0.2%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
534
99.8%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
4
0.7%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
28
5.2%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
503
94.0%
split by
peak 170 / year
20071
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20080
20090
20100
20110
20121
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20130
20141
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20150
20160
201720
Not applicable20
Critical3
High10
Medium7
not blocked20
Exploited1
No public exploit19
2018170
No exploit published1
Not applicable169
Critical3
High150
Medium16
Low1
not blocked170
Exploited1
No public exploit169
201985
No exploit published32
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable52
Critical10
High44
Medium26
Low5
not blocked85
No public exploit85
202037
No exploit published3
Not applicable34
Critical2
High16
Medium14
Low5
not blocked37
No public exploit37
202120
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable18
High7
Medium13
not blocked20
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit19
202244
No exploit published2
Not applicable42
Critical3
High13
Medium28
not blocked44
Proof of concept only4
No public exploit40
202349
No exploit published3
Not applicable46
Critical4
High15
Medium26
Low4
not blocked49
Proof of concept only10
No public exploit39
202432
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable29
Critical2
High8
Medium22
not blocked32
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit29
202542
No exploit published15
Not applicable27
Critical1
High12
Medium26
Low3
not blocked42
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit40
202633
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published2
Not applicable30
Critical6
High10
Medium13
Low4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked32
Exploited2
Proof of concept only8
No public exploit23
2008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-126818 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A Ruby object-document mapper does not apply its automatic field-level encryption configuration to certain fields when the data model uses class inheritance. Values the application designated for encryption are written to the database in readable form without any error or warning. A database account holding only read access to the application's collections, and no access to the encryption key store, may obtain those values. |
| CVE-2026-5345 | Low | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL AION is affected by a missing encryption vulnerability in a second WebSocket connection defined in the GenAI web interface. The connection used the unencrypted WebSocket protocol (ws://test) instead of an encrypted (wss://) channel. This may allow data exchanged over the connection to be intercepted or read by an attacker on the network, potentially resulting in unintended behavior or security impact under certain conditions. |
| CVE-2026-35110 | Medium | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where encrypted (HTTPS) communication was not enforced for all requests. Data may be transmitted over unencrypted connections and intercepted by an attacker on the network, potentially resulting in unintended behavior or security impact under certain conditions. |
| CVE-2026-21849 | Low | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL AION is affected by a missing encryption vulnerability in the WebSocket connection set up by the GenAI web interface. The connection used the unencrypted WebSocket protocol (ws://localhost:8000) instead of an encrypted (wss://) channel. This may allow data exchanged over the connection to be intercepted or read by an attacker on the network, potentially resulting in unintended behavior or security impact under certain conditions. |
| CVE-2026-116198 | Medium | 2026-10-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Snipe-IT before 8.7.0 contains a missing encryption vulnerability in Api\AssetsController::store that writes plaintext into encrypted-flagged custom-field columns when callers lack assets.view.encrypted_custom_fields. Authenticated API users without that permission can create assets whose sensitive custom-field values persist unencrypted in the database, exposing them through backups, replicas, or direct database access. |
| CVE-2026-115247 | Low | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A security vulnerability has been detected in subhajitkhan online-clinic-management-system up to e9ee77a8827a1446220fa07ee693dc4d9a29a578. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file patientregistration.php. The manipulation of the argument pat_pswd/doc_pswd leads to missing encryption of sensitive data. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. |
| CVE-2026-43854 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability could allow an attacker with access to an encrypted project file to retrieve administrator credentials for EdgeLink-enabled devices. |
| CVE-2026-86375 | Medium | 2026-10-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Application Installer, versions prior to 26.09.0.1, contain a Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-111063 | Medium | 2026-10-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.4, the Secure attribute for a shared cookie is not enforced. An attacker can consequently cause a shared cookie marked Secure to be sent with an unencrypted request. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.4. |
| CVE-2026-78860 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | An issue in Mercusys AC12 V2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the storage of information in plaintext |
| CVE-2026-105179 | Low | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A weakness has been identified in SourceCodester Drug Recommendation System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file Admin/add_user.php of the component Password Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument Password can lead to missing encryption of sensitive data. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. |
| CVE-2026-92757 | Medium | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Applications built on MongoDB Entity Framework Core Provider which place a database name in the connection string may inadvertently disable field level encryption. |
| CVE-2026-92756 | Medium | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Applications built on MongoDB Entity Framework Core Provider which combine independent encryption settings and this provider's encryption settings may silently lose TLS and schema-map settings leading to protected fields being stored unencrypted in the database. |
| CVE-2026-84676 | Medium | 2026-09-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Parameterized Remote Trigger Plugin 3.2.2 and earlier stores tokens unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with Item/Extended Read permission or access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2026-81688 | High | 2026-08-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.9 store an unkeyed SHA-256 hash of the plaintext in the cleartext file header metadata. Attackers can read this hash without the password to confirm guessed plaintexts offline or fingerprint identical plaintexts across separately-encrypted files. |
| CVE-2026-81681 | Critical | 2026-08-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | openssl_encrypt (pip package openssl-encrypt) versions <= 1.4.8 advertise a portable USB workspace as an 'Encrypted USB Workspace' with AES-256-GCM encryption and write a marker declaring the workspace encrypted, but the workspace directory is actually stored in cleartext and the derived encryption key is never applied to it. A user who trusts the branding and places files in the workspace leaves them unencrypted on the removable media, so an attacker with physical access to the media can read the sensitive files. Fixed in 1.4.9, which seals the workspace into an authenticated AES-256-GCM vault. |
| CVE-2026-77812 | Critical | 2026-08-21 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DJI drones transmit DUML (DJI Universal Markup Language) protocol messages over BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) without encryption. When a client attempts to connect to the drone over Wi-Fi, or when the drone is switched to QuickTransfer mode, the DJI Fly application exchanges DUML messages with the drone over BLE, including the Wi-Fi credentials. An attacker within BLE range can passively sniff this traffic and recover the credentials in cleartext, including the drone's Wi-Fi PSK, SSID, and trusted identifier UUID. Obtaining these credentials allows the attacker to join the drone's internal Wi-Fi network, interact with network services exposed by the drone, and decrypt Wi-Fi traffic exchanged between the drone and the legitimate user. * An attacker within BLE range recovers the Wi-Fi SSID and PSK in cleartext, and can then join the drone's network * The same capture also exposes the session UUID identifier, which is the only thing the drone uses to tell a trusted client from an unknown one, so the attacker can replay it and skip the physical confirmation of new connected devices. * The credentials do not change between sessions unless the operator manually resets the Wi-Fi settings, so one capture stays valid indefinitely * The attack is fully passive, with nothing transmitted and no connection made, so neither the operator nor the drone has any indication the session was observed * A BLE sniffer and presence during one normal DJI Fly connection are needed Affected models are DJI Neo until 01.00.0400, DJI Neo 2 until 01.00.0500, DJI Flip until 01.00.1200, DJI Air 3 until 01.00.1600, DJI Air 3S until 01.00.1400, DJI Avata 2 until 01.00.0400, DJI Avata 360 until 01.00.0300, DJI Mavic 3 until 01.00.1400, DJI Mavic 3 Classic until 01.00.0800, DJI Mavic 3 Pro until 01.01.0700, DJI Mavic 4 Pro until 01.00.0500, DJI Mini 2 until 01.07.0200, DJI Mini 3 until 01.00.0500, DJI Mini 3 Pro until 01.00.0900, DJI Mini 4 Pro until 01.00.1100, and DJI Mini 5 Pro until 01.00.0600. Remediation requires a firmware update from the vendor. There is no user-side mitigation that fully addresses the vulnerability without upgrading. |
| CVE-2026-19891 | Medium | 2026-08-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability was determined in TRENDnet TEW-WLC100 2.05b02. This affects an unknown function of the file /etc/racoon.conf of the component IKE Phase 1 Aggressive Mode. This manipulation of the argument exchange_mode causes missing encryption of sensitive data. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is reported as difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure. |
| CVE-2025-59325 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to encrypt the initramfs contents, allowing for the offline recovery of secrets and cryptographic details. |
| CVE-2026-21079 | High | 2026-08-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Missing encryption of sensitive data in Smart Switch prior to version 3.7.72.6 allows adjacent attackers to intercept transmitted data. |
| CVE-2026-20157 | Critical | 2026-07-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco RoomOS engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20157 are related to missing encryption that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-311. |
| CVE-2025-63579 | High | 2026-07-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unauthorized use of Kyocera printers, allows all information stored in the Kyocera address book to be exported. The security measure that encrypts incoming data ian be bypassed with this vulnerability, allowing encrypted data to be decrypted. Passwords and other sensitive information can be obtained. This affects Kyocera Command Center RX TASKalfa 2552ci, TASKalfa 3252ci, TASKalfa 2553ci, TASKalfa 3253ci, TASKalfa 3554ci, TASKalfa 4052ci, TASKalfa 5052ci, TASKalfa 6052ci, TASKalfa 7052ci, TASKalfa 8052ci, TASKalfa 7353ci, TASKalfa 8353ci, TASKalfa 2554ci, TASKalfa 3254ci, TASKalfa 505. |
| CVE-2026-54784 | High | 2026-07-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1. |
| CVE-2026-55568 | Medium | 2026-06-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Guzzle is an extensible PHP HTTP client. Prior to 7.12.1, in certain configurations, traffic expected to be protected by TLS on the hop to the proxy is transmitted in cleartext. Proxy authentication credentials (the Proxy-Authorization header, proxy userinfo in the proxy URL, or CURLOPT_PROXYUSERPWD) are sent without encryption, and the CONNECT target host and port for tunneled HTTPS requests are exposed. The built-in cURL handlers (GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlHandler and GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlMultiHandler, used by default whenever the PHP cURL extension is available) accept an https:// proxy. libcurl older than 7.50.2 silently treats an https:// proxy as a plaintext http:// proxy. The TLS connection to the proxy is never established, and the proxy leg is cleartext with no error or warning. An application is affected when it sends requests through one of the built-in cURL handlers, configures an https:// proxy expecting the proxy connection itself to be encrypted, and runs with libcurl older than 7.50.2. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.12.1. |
| CVE-2026-53442 | Medium | 2026-06-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins 2.567 and earlier, LTS 2.555.2 and earlier does not encrypt secrets from POST config.xml submissions before storing them in job configurations unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with Item/Extended Read permission, or access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2026-34486 | High | 2026-04-09 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data vulnerability in Apache Tomcat due to the fix for CVE-2026-29146 allowing the bypass of the EncryptInterceptor. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: 11.0.20, 10.1.53, 9.0.116. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117, which fix the issue. |
| CVE-2026-34992 | High | 2026-04-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Antrea is a Kubernetes networking solution intended to be Kubernetes native. Prior to 2.4.5 and 2.5.2, a missing encryption vulnerability affects inter-Node Pod traffic. In Antrea clusters configured for dual-stack networking with IPsec encryption enabled (trafficEncryptionMode: ipsec), Antrea fails to apply encryption for IPv6 Pod traffic. While the IPv4 traffic is correctly encrypted via ESP (Encapsulating Security Payload), traffic using IPv6 is transmitted in plaintext. This occurs because the packets are encapsulated (using Geneve or VXLAN) but bypass the IPsec encryption layer. Impacted Users: users with dual-stack clusters and IPsec encryption enabled. Single-stack IPv4 or IPv6 clusters are not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.4.5 and 2.5.2. |
| CVE-2026-32891 | Critical | 2026-03-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Anchorr is a Discord bot for requesting movies and TV shows and receiving notifications when items are added to a media server. Versions 1.4.1 and below contain a stored XSS vulnerability in the Jellyseerr user selector. Jellyseerr allows any account holder to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the Anchorr admin's browser session. The injected script calls the authenticated /api/config endpoint - which returns the full application configuration in plaintext. This allows the attacker to forge a valid Anchorr session token and gain full admin access to the dashboard with no knowledge of the admin password. The same response also exposes the API keys and tokens for every integrated service, resulting in simultaneous account takeover of the Jellyfin media server (via JELLYFIN_API_KEY), the Jellyseerr request manager (via JELLYSEERR_API_KEY), and the Discord bot (via DISCORD_TOKEN). This issue has been fixed in version 1.4.2. |
| CVE-2026-27944 | Critical | 2026-03-05 | Not applicable | Exploited | Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. Prior to version 2.3.3, the /api/backup endpoint is accessible without authentication and discloses the encryption keys required to decrypt the backup in the X-Backup-Security response header. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to download a full system backup containing sensitive data (user credentials, session tokens, SSL private keys, Nginx configurations) and decrypt it immediately. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.3. |
| CVE-2025-69969 | Critical | 2026-03-04 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A lack of authentication and authorization mechanisms in the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) communication protocol of SRK Powertech Pvt Ltd Pebble Prism Ultra v2.9.2 allows attackers to reverse engineer the protocol and execute arbitrary commands on the device without establishing a connection. This is exploitable over Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) proximity (Adjacent), requiring no physical contact with the device. Furthermore, the vulnerability is not limited to arbitrary commands but includes cleartext data interception and unauthenticated firmware hijacking via OTA services. |
| CVE-2025-15548 | Medium | 2026-01-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Some VX800v v1.0 web interface endpoints transmit sensitive information over unencrypted HTTP due to missing application layer encryption, allowing a network adjacent attacker to intercept this traffic and compromise its confidentiality. |
| CVE-2025-65098 | High | 2026-01-22 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Typebot is an open-source chatbot builder. In versions prior to 3.13.2, client-side script execution in Typebot allows stealing all stored credentials from any user. When a victim previews a malicious typebot by clicking "Run", JavaScript executes in their browser and exfiltrates their OpenAI keys, Google Sheets tokens, and SMTP passwords. The `/api/trpc/credentials.getCredentials` endpoint returns plaintext API keys without verifying credential ownership. Version 3.13.2 fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2025-13453 | Medium | 2026-01-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A potential vulnerability was reported in some ThinkPlus USB drives that could allow a user with physical access to read data stored on the drive. |
| CVE-2025-15065 | High | 2025-12-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data, Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties vulnerability in Kings Information & Network Co. KESS Enterprise on Windows allows Privilege Escalation, Modify Existing Service, Modify Shared File.This issue affects KESS Enterprise: before *.25.9.19.exe |
| CVE-2025-36751 | Critical | 2025-12-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Encryption is missing on the configuration interface for Growatt ShineLan-X and MIC 3300TL-X. This allows an attacker with access to the network to intercept and potentially manipulate communication requests between the inverter and its cloud endpoint. |
| CVE-2025-13053 | High | 2025-12-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When a user configures the NAS to retrieve UPS status or control the UPS, a non-enforced TLS certificate verification can allow an attacker able to intercept network traffic between the client and server can perform a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack, which may obtain the sensitive information of the UPS server configuation. This issue affects ADM: from 4.1.0 through 4.3.3.RKD2, from 5.0.0 through 5.1.0.RN42. |
| CVE-2025-65825 | Medium | 2025-12-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The firmware on the basestation of the Meatmeet is not encrypted. An adversary with physical access to the Meatmeet device can disassemble the device, connect over UART, and retrieve the firmware dump for analysis. Within the NVS partition they may discover the credentials of the current and previous Wi-Fi networks. This information could be used to gain unauthorized access to the victim's Wi-Fi network. |
| CVE-2025-64147 | Medium | 2025-10-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Curseforge Publisher Plugin 1.0 does not mask API Keys displayed on the job configuration form, increasing the potential for attackers to observe and capture them. |
| CVE-2025-64146 | Medium | 2025-10-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Curseforge Publisher Plugin 1.0 stores API Keys unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with Item/Extended Read permission, or access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2025-64145 | Medium | 2025-10-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins ByteGuard Build Actions Plugin 1.0 does not mask API tokens displayed on the job configuration form, increasing the potential for attackers to observe and capture them. |
| CVE-2025-64144 | Medium | 2025-10-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins ByteGuard Build Actions Plugin 1.0 stores API tokens unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with Item/Extended Read permission, or access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2025-64143 | Medium | 2025-10-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins OpenShift Pipeline Plugin 1.0.57 and earlier stores authorization tokens unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with Item/Extended Read permission, or access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2025-48981 | High | 2025-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An insecure implementation of the proprietary protocol DNET in Product CGM MEDICO allows attackers within the intranet to eavesdrop and manipulate data on the protocol because encryption is optional for this connection. |
| CVE-2025-59410 | Medium | 2025-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dragonfly is an open source P2P-based file distribution and image acceleration system. Prior to 2.1.0, the code in the scheduler for downloading a tiny file is hard coded to use the HTTP protocol, rather than HTTPS. This means that an attacker could perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack, changing the network request so that a different piece of data gets downloaded. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.0. |
| CVE-2025-10227 | Medium | 2025-09-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data (CWE-311) in the Object Archive component in AxxonSoft Axxon One (C-Werk) before 2.0.8 on Windows and Linux allows a local attacker with access to exported storage or stolen physical drives to extract sensitive archive data in plaintext via lack of encryption at rest. |
| CVE-2025-31977 | Medium | 2025-08-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL BigFix SM is affected by cryptographic weakness due to weak or outdated encryption algorithms. An attacker with network access could exploit this weakness to decrypt or manipulate encrypted communications under certain conditions. |
| CVE-2025-48862 | High | 2025-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Ambiguous wording in the web interface of the ctrlX OS setup mechanism could lead the user to believe that the backup file is encrypted when a password is set. However, only the private key - if available in the backup - is encrypted, while the backup file itself remains unencrypted. |
| CVE-2024-41982 | Medium | 2025-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability has been identified in SmartClient modules Opcenter QL Home (SC) (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Audit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Cockpit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506). The affected application does not have adequate encryption of sensitive information. This could allow an authenticated attacker to gain access of sensitive information. |
| CVE-2024-41980 | Low | 2025-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability has been identified in SmartClient modules Opcenter QL Home (SC) (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Audit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Cockpit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506). The affected application do not encrypt the communication in LDAP interface by default. This could allow an authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information. |
| CVE-2025-8763 | Medium | 2025-08-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Ruijie EG306MG 3.0(1)B11P309. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /etc/strongswan.conf of the component strongSwan. The manipulation of the argument i_dont_care_about_security_and_use_aggressive_mode_psk leads to missing encryption of sensitive data. The attack may be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2025-45768 | High | 2025-07-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | pyjwt v2.10.1 was discovered to contain weak encryption. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because the key length is chosen by the application that uses the library (admittedly, library users may benefit from a minimum value and a mechanism for opting in to strict enforcement). |
| CVE-2025-43274 | Medium | 2025-07-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A privacy issue was addressed by removing the vulnerable code. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.6. A sandboxed process may be able to circumvent sandbox restrictions. |
| CVE-2025-40680 | Medium | 2025-07-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Lack of sensitive data encryption in CapillaryScope v2.5.0 of Capillary io, which stores both the proxy credentials and the JWT session token in plain text within different registry keys on the Windows operating system. Any authenticated local user with read access to the registry can extract these sensitive values. |
| CVE-2025-33020 | High | 2025-07-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Engineering Systems Design Rhapsody 9.0.2, 10.0, and 10.0.1 transmits sensitive information without encryption that could allow an attacker to obtain highly sensitive information. |
| CVE-2025-36062 | High | 2025-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Cognos Analytics Mobile (iOS) 1.1.0 through 1.1.22 could be vulnerable to information exposure due to the use of unencrypted network traffic. |
| CVE-2025-53678 | Medium | 2025-07-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins User1st uTester Plugin 1.1 and earlier stores the uTester JWT token unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins controller, where it can be viewed by users with access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2025-53676 | Medium | 2025-07-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Xooa Plugin 0.0.7 and earlier stores the Xooa Deployment Token unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins controller, where it can be viewed by users with access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2025-53673 | Medium | 2025-07-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Sensedia Api Platform tools Plugin 1.0 stores the Sensedia API Manager integration token unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins controller, where it can be viewed by users with access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2025-53668 | Medium | 2025-07-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins VAddy Plugin 1.2.8 and earlier stores Vaddy API Auth Keys unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller, where they can be viewed by users with Item/Extended Read permission or access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2025-53666 | Medium | 2025-07-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Dead Man's Snitch Plugin 0.1 stores Dead Man's Snitch tokens unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller, where they can be viewed by users with Item/Extended Read permission or access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2025-53663 | Medium | 2025-07-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins IBM Cloud DevOps Plugin 2.0.16 and earlier stores SonarQube authentication tokens unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller, where they can be viewed by users with Item/Extended Read permission or access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2025-53659 | Medium | 2025-07-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins QMetry Test Management Plugin 1.13 and earlier stores Qmetry Automation API Keys unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller, where they can be viewed by users with Item/Extended Read permission or access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2025-53653 | Medium | 2025-07-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Aqua Security Scanner Plugin 3.2.8 and earlier stores Scanner Tokens for Aqua API unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller, where they can be viewed by users with Item/Extended Read permission or access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2014-6274 | High | 2025-06-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | git-annex had a bug in the S3 and Glacier remotes where if embedcreds=yes was set, and the remote used encryption=pubkey or encryption=hybrid, the embedded AWS credentials were stored in the git repository in (effectively) plaintext, not encrypted as they were supposed to be. This issue affects git-annex: from 3.20121126 before 5.20140919. |
| CVE-2025-32875 | Medium | 2025-06-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | An issue was discovered in the COROS application through 3.8.12 for Android. Bluetooth pairing and bonding is neither initiated nor enforced by the application itself. Also, the watch does not enforce pairing and bonding. As a result, any data transmitted via BLE remains unencrypted, allowing attackers within Bluetooth range to eavesdrop on the communication. Furthermore, even if a user manually initiates pairing and bonding in the Android settings, the application continues to transmit data without requiring the watch to be bonded. This fallback behavior enables attackers to exploit the communication, for example, by conducting an active machine-in-the-middle attack. |
| CVE-2025-24008 | High | 2025-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability has been identified in SIRIUS 3RK3 Modular Safety System (MSS) (All versions), SIRIUS Safety Relays 3SK2 (All versions). The affected devices do not encrypt data in transit. An attacker with network access could eavesdrop the connection and retrieve sensitive information, including obfuscated safety passwords. |
| CVE-2025-47274 | Low | 2025-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ToolHive is a utility designed to simplify the deployment and management of Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Due to the ordering of code used to start an MCP server container, versions of ToolHive prior to 0.0.33 inadvertently store secrets in the run config files which are used to restart stopped containers. This means that an attacker who has access to the home folder of the user who starts the MCP server can read secrets without needing access to the secrets store itself. This only applies to secrets which were used in containers whose run configs exist at a point in time - other secrets remaining inaccessible. ToolHive 0.0.33 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. Stop and delete any running MCP servers, or manually remove any runconfigs from `$HOME/Library/Application Support/toolhive/runconfigs/` (macOS) or `$HOME/.state/toolhive/runconfigs/` (Linux). |
| CVE-2025-31728 | Medium | 2025-04-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins AsakusaSatellite Plugin 0.1.1 and earlier does not mask AsakusaSatellite API keys displayed on the job configuration form, increasing the potential for attackers to observe and capture them. |
| CVE-2023-37405 | Medium | 2025-03-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.3.0, 2.3.3.3, 2.3.3.3 iFix1, 2.3.3.4, 2.3.3.5, 2.3.3.6, 2.3.36 iFix1, 2.3.3.6 iFix2, 2.3.3.7, 2.3.3.7 iFix1, 2.3.4.0, and 2.3.4.1 stores sensitive data in memory, that could be obtained by an unauthorized user. |
| CVE-2025-29314 | High | 2025-03-24 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | Insecure Shiro cookie configurations in OpenDaylight Service Function Chaining (SFC) Subproject SFC Sodium-SR4 and below allow attackers to access sensitive information via a man-in-the-middle attack. |
| CVE-2025-1243 | Low | 2025-02-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Temporal api-go library prior to version 1.44.1 did not send `update response` information to Data Converter when the proxy package within the api-go module was used in a gRPC proxy prior to transmission. This resulted in information contained within the `update response` field not having Data Converter transformations (e.g. encryption) applied. This is an issue only when using the UpdateWorkflowExecution APIs (released on 13th January 2025) with a proxy leveraging the api-go library before version 1.44.1. Other data fields were correctly sent to Data Converter. This issue does not impact the Data Converter server. Data was encrypted in transit. Temporal Cloud services are not impacted. |
| CVE-2024-38325 | High | 2025-01-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Defender 2.0.0 through 2.0.7 on-prem defender-sensor-cmd CLI could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by sending network requests over an insecure channel. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. |
| CVE-2024-41757 | Medium | 2025-01-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Concert Software 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. |
| CVE-2024-7142 | Medium | 2025-01-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On Arista CloudVision Appliance (CVA) affected releases running on appliances that support hardware disk encryption (DCA-350E-CV only), the disk encryption might not be successfully performed. This results in the disks remaining unsecured and data on them |
| CVE-2024-56439 | High | 2025-01-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Access control vulnerability in the identity authentication module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality. |
| CVE-2024-43382 | Medium | 2024-10-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Snowflake JDBC driver versions >= 3.2.6 and <= 3.19.1 have an Incorrect Security Setting that can result in data being uploaded to an encrypted stage without the additional layer of protection provided by client side encryption. |
| CVE-2024-47871 | High | 2024-10-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Gradio is an open-source Python package designed for quick prototyping. This vulnerability involves **insecure communication** between the FRP (Fast Reverse Proxy) client and server when Gradio's `share=True` option is used. HTTPS is not enforced on the connection, allowing attackers to intercept and read files uploaded to the Gradio server, as well as modify responses or data sent between the client and server. This impacts users who are sharing Gradio demos publicly over the internet using `share=True` without proper encryption, exposing sensitive data to potential eavesdroppers. Users are advised to upgrade to `gradio>=5` to address this issue. As a workaround, users can avoid using `share=True` in production environments and instead host their Gradio applications on servers with HTTPS enabled to ensure secure communication. |
| CVE-2024-20515 | Medium | 2024-10-02 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from an affected device. This vulnerability is due to a lack of proper data protection mechanisms for certain configuration settings. An attacker with Read-Only Administrator privileges could exploit this vulnerability by browsing to a page that contains sensitive data. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view device credentials that are normally not visible to Read-Only Administrators. |
| CVE-2023-52950 | Medium | 2024-09-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Missing encryption of sensitive data vulnerability in login component in Synology Active Backup for Business Agent before 2.7.0-3221 allows adjacent man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain user credential via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2023-52948 | Medium | 2024-09-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Missing encryption of sensitive data vulnerability in settings functionality in Synology Active Backup for Business Agent before 2.7.0-3221 allows local users to obtain user credential via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2024-42495 | High | 2024-09-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Credentials to access device configuration were transmitted using an unencrypted protocol. These credentials would allow read-only access to network configuration information and terminal configuration data. |
| CVE-2024-20503 | Medium | 2024-09-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Cisco Duo Epic for Hyperdrive could allow an authenticated, local attacker to view sensitive information in cleartext on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to improper storage of an unencrypted registry key. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability by viewing or querying the registry key on the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view sensitive information in cleartext. |
| CVE-2024-42657 | High | 2024-08-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue in wishnet Nepstech Wifi Router NTPL-XPON1GFEVN v1.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the lack of encryption during login process |
| CVE-2024-40620 | Medium | 2024-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | CVE-2024-40620 IMPACT A vulnerability exists in the affected product due to lack of encryption of sensitive information. The vulnerability results in data being sent between the Console and the Dashboard without encryption, which can be seen in the logs of proxy servers, potentially impacting the data's confidentiality. |
| CVE-2024-7396 | High | 2024-08-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Missing encryption of sensitive data in Korenix JetPort 5601v3 allows Eavesdropping.This issue affects JetPort 5601v3: through 1.2. |
| CVE-2024-23444 | High | 2024-07-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was discovered by Elastic engineering that when elasticsearch-certutil CLI tool is used with the csr option in order to create a new Certificate Signing Requests, the associated private key that is generated is stored on disk unencrypted even if the --pass parameter is passed in the command invocation. |
| CVE-2024-41124 | Medium | 2024-07-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Puncia is the Official CLI utility for Subdomain Center & Exploit Observer. `API_URLS` is utilizing HTTP instead of HTTPS for communication that can lead to issues like Eavesdropping, Data Tampering, Unauthorized Data Access & MITM Attacks. This issue has been addressed in release version 0.21 by using https rather than http connections. All users are advised to upgrade. There is no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-38302 | Medium | 2024-07-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Data Lakehouse, version(s) 1.0.0.0, contain(s) a Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data vulnerability in the DDAE (Starburst). A low privileged attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2024-5731 | Medium | 2024-06-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the IPS Manager, Central Manager, and Local Manager communication workflow allows an attacker to control the destination of a request by manipulating the parameter, thereby leveraging sensitive information. |
| CVE-2024-38283 | Medium | 2024-06-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sensitive customer information is stored in the device without encryption. |
| CVE-2023-49927 | Medium | 2024-06-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor, Wearable Processor, and Modem Exynos 980, Exynos 990, Exynos 850, Exynos 1080, Exynos 2100, Exynos 2200, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, Exynos 1330, Exynos 9110, Exynos W920, Exynos Modem 5123, Exynos Modem 5300. The baseband software does not properly check format types specified by the RRC. This can lead to a lack of encryption. |
| CVE-2024-35061 | High | 2024-05-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | NASA AIT-Core v2.5.2 was discovered to use unencrypted channels to exchange data over the network, allowing attackers to execute a man-in-the-middle attack. When chained with CVE-2024-35059, the CVE in subject leads to an unauthenticated, fully remote code execution. |
| CVE-2024-27106 | Medium | 2024-05-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerable data in transit in GE HealthCare EchoPAC products |
| CVE-2024-25027 | Medium | 2024-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.6 could disclose sensitive snapshot information due to missing encryption. IBM X-Force ID: 281607. |
| CVE-2023-35888 | Medium | 2024-03-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Governance 10.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 258375. |
| CVE-2024-29151 | Critical | 2024-03-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Rocket.Chat.Audit through 5ad78e8 depends on filecachetools, which does not exist in PyPI. |
| CVE-2024-28250 | Medium | 2024-03-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue. |
| CVE-2024-28249 | Medium | 2024-03-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Prior to versions 1.13.13, 1.14.8, and 1.15.2, in Cilium clusters with IPsec enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies, IPsec-eligible traffic between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and IPsec-eligible traffic between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.15.2, 1.14.8, and 1.13.13. There is no known workaround for this issue. |
| CVE-2021-39090 | Medium | 2024-02-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Cloud Pak for Security (CP4S) 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.6.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 216388. |
| CVE-2024-25631 | Medium | 2024-02-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For Cilium users who have enabled an external kvstore and Wireguard transparent encryption, traffic between pods in the affected cluster is not encrypted. This issue affects Cilium v1.14 before v1.14.7 and has been patched in Cilium v1.14.7. There is no workaround to this issue. |