WaratekVRT Sign in

High CWE-310 CVEs

7 CVEs, 3 protected by Waratek

Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
CWE CWE-310✕
Overview 7 matches · 3 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
7matches 3protected42.9% 0exploited0.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 0public PoC0.0% 0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek 3 42.9% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 4 57.1%
Critical 0 0.0% High 7 100.0% Medium 0 0.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 3 42.9% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 4 57.1% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 0 0.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 7 100.0%
split by peak 3 / year
No exploit published: 4Protected by Waratek: 3 High: 7 not blocked: 4blocked by ARMR today: 3 No public exploit: 7
20091 No exploit published1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20100 20110 20121 No exploit published1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20130 20140 20150 20160 20171 No exploit published1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20183 Protected by Waratek3 High3 blocked by ARMR today3 No public exploit3 20190 20201 No exploit published1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
7 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2020-8897 High 2020-11-16 No exploit published No public exploit A weak robustness vulnerability exists in the AWS Encryption SDKs for Java, Python, C and Javalcript prior to versions 2.0.0. Due to the non-committing property of AES-GCM (and other AEAD ciphers such as AES-GCM-SIV or (X)ChaCha20Poly1305) used by the SDKs to encrypt messages, an attacker can craft a unique cyphertext which will decrypt to multiple different results, and becomes especially relevant in a multi-recipient setting. We recommend users update their SDK to 2.0.0 or later.
CVE-2016-1000352 High 2018-06-04 Protected by Waratek No public exploit In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the ECIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider.
CVE-2016-1000344 High 2018-06-04 Protected by Waratek No public exploit In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider.
CVE-2016-1000343 High 2018-06-04 Protected by Waratek No public exploit In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA key pair generator generates a weak private key if used with default values. If the JCA key pair generator is not explicitly initialised with DSA parameters, 1.55 and earlier generates a private value assuming a 1024 bit key size. In earlier releases this can be dealt with by explicitly passing parameters to the key pair generator.
CVE-2014-7808 High 2017-09-15 No exploit published No public exploit Apache Wicket before 1.5.13, 6.x before 6.19.0, and 7.x before 7.0.0-M5 make it easier for attackers to defeat a cryptographic protection mechanism and predict encrypted URLs by leveraging use of CryptoMapper as the default encryption provider.
CVE-2012-3376 High 2012-07-12 No exploit published No public exploit DataNodes in Apache Hadoop 2.0.0 alpha does not check the BlockTokens of clients when Kerberos is enabled and the DataNode has checked out the same BlockPool twice from a NodeName, which might allow remote clients to read arbitrary blocks, write to blocks to which they only have read access, and have other unspecified impacts.
CVE-2009-1174 High 2009-03-31 No exploit published No public exploit The Web Services Security component in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.0.2 before 6.0.2.35 and 7.0 before 7.0.0.3 has an unspecified "security problem" in the XML digital-signature specification, which has unknown impact and attack vectors.