WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕CWE CWE-297✕
Overview 2 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
2matches 1in Waratek scope50.0% 0protected0.0% 0exploited0.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 0public PoC0.0% 0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 1 50.0% Outside Waratek scope 0 0.0% Not applicable 0 0.0% Withdrawn CVE 1 50.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 0 0.0% Medium 0 0.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 2 100.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 2 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 0 0.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 2 100.0%
split by peak 1 / month
Withdrawn CVE: 1No exploit published: 1 Unknown: 2 not blocked: 2 No public exploit: 2
Apr 261 Withdrawn CVE1 Unknown1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 May 260 Jun 260 Jul 260 Aug 260 Sep 260 Oct 260 Nov 261 No exploit published1 Unknown1 not blocked1 No public exploit1
Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26Aug 26Sep 26Oct 26Nov 26
2 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2026-87758 Unknown 2026-11-10 No exploit published No public exploit The remote EJB client does not verify that the hostname of the server it connects to matches the server's TLS certificate. An attacker able to intercept network traffic between an EJB client and server can impersonate the server and read or modify the traffic, including credentials and invocation data. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.3.0 or 11.0.0-M2, which fix the issue.
CVE-2026-41603 Unknown 2026-04-28 Withdrawn CVE No public exploit Rejected reason: This CVE ID is Rejected and will not be used. The record incorrectly described the affected language binding and fixed version. Use CVE-2026-66053, which was assigned to the vulnerability.