Overview 12 matches · 2 protected · 7 exploited · 2 CISA KEV · 6 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
2
16.7%
Rule in development
1
8.3%
Mitigation candidate
9
75.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
2
16.7%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
10
83.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
7
58.3%
Working exploit published
3
25.0%
Proof of concept only
2
16.7%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 3 / year
20091
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20100
20110
20120
20130
20140
20150
20160
20170
20181
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20190
20202
Mitigation candidate2
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
Exploited1
Proof of concept only1
20213
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
Critical2
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
20220
20232
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
High1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
20241
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20252
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
Exploited2
200920112013201520172019202120232025
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-61884 | High | 2025-10-12 | Rule in development | Exploited | Vulnerability in the Oracle Configurator product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Runtime UI). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.14. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Configurator. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Configurator accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2025-61882 | Critical | 2025-10-05 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Vulnerability in the Oracle Concurrent Processing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: BI Publisher Integration). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.14. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Concurrent Processing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Concurrent Processing. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2024-45216 | Critical | 2024-10-16 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Improper Authentication vulnerability in Apache Solr. Solr instances using the PKIAuthenticationPlugin, which is enabled by default when Solr Authentication is used, are vulnerable to Authentication bypass. A fake ending at the end of any Solr API URL path, will allow requests to skip Authentication while maintaining the API contract with the original URL Path. This fake ending looks like an unprotected API path, however it is stripped off internally after authentication but before API routing. This issue affects Apache Solr: from 5.3.0 before 8.11.4, from 9.0.0 before 9.7.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.7.0, or 8.11.4, which fix the issue. |
| CVE-2022-41678 | High | 2023-11-28 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Once an user is authenticated on Jolokia, he can potentially trigger arbitrary code execution. In details, in ActiveMQ configurations, jetty allows org.jolokia.http.AgentServlet to handler request to /api/jolokia org.jolokia.http.HttpRequestHandler#handlePostRequest is able to create JmxRequest through JSONObject. And calls to org.jolokia.http.HttpRequestHandler#executeRequest. Into deeper calling stacks, org.jolokia.handler.ExecHandler#doHandleRequest can be invoked through refection. This could lead to RCE through via various mbeans. One example is unrestricted deserialization in jdk.management.jfr.FlightRecorderMXBeanImpl which exists on Java version above 11. 1 Call newRecording. 2 Call setConfiguration. And a webshell data hides in it. 3 Call startRecording. 4 Call copyTo method. The webshell will be written to a .jsp file. The mitigation is to restrict (by default) the actions authorized on Jolokia, or disable Jolokia. A more restrictive Jolokia configuration has been defined in default ActiveMQ distribution. We encourage users to upgrade to ActiveMQ distributions version including updated Jolokia configuration: 5.16.6, 5.17.4, 5.18.0, 6.0.0. |
| CVE-2023-0264 | Medium | 2023-08-04 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | A flaw was found in Keycloaks OpenID Connect user authentication, which may incorrectly authenticate requests. An authenticated attacker who could obtain information from a user request within the same realm could use that data to impersonate the victim and generate new session tokens. This issue could impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability. |
| CVE-2021-37580 | Critical | 2021-11-16 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A flaw was found in Apache ShenYu Admin. The incorrect use of JWT in ShenyuAdminBootstrap allows an attacker to bypass authentication. This issue affected Apache ShenYu 2.3.0 and 2.4.0 |
| CVE-2020-27838 | Medium | 2021-03-08 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | A flaw was found in keycloak in versions prior to 13.0.0. The client registration endpoint allows fetching information about PUBLIC clients (like client secret) without authentication which could be an issue if the same PUBLIC client changed to CONFIDENTIAL later. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. |
| CVE-2020-17523 | Critical | 2021-02-03 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Apache Shiro before 1.7.1, when using Apache Shiro with Spring, a specially crafted HTTP request may cause an authentication bypass. |
| CVE-2020-13933 | High | 2020-08-17 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | Apache Shiro before 1.6.0, when using Apache Shiro, a specially crafted HTTP request may cause an authentication bypass. |
| CVE-2020-9480 | Critical | 2020-06-23 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | In Apache Spark 2.4.5 and earlier, a standalone resource manager's master may be configured to require authentication (spark.authenticate) via a shared secret. When enabled, however, a specially-crafted RPC to the master can succeed in starting an application's resources on the Spark cluster, even without the shared key. This can be leveraged to execute shell commands on the host machine. This does not affect Spark clusters using other resource managers (YARN, Mesos, etc). |
| CVE-2018-11770 | Medium | 2018-08-13 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | From version 1.3.0 onward, Apache Spark's standalone master exposes a REST API for job submission, in addition to the submission mechanism used by spark-submit. In standalone, the config property 'spark.authenticate.secret' establishes a shared secret for authenticating requests to submit jobs via spark-submit. However, the REST API does not use this or any other authentication mechanism, and this is not adequately documented. In this case, a user would be able to run a driver program without authenticating, but not launch executors, using the REST API. This REST API is also used by Mesos, when set up to run in cluster mode (i.e., when also running MesosClusterDispatcher), for job submission. Future versions of Spark will improve documentation on these points, and prohibit setting 'spark.authenticate.secret' when running the REST APIs, to make this clear. Future versions will also disable the REST API by default in the standalone master by changing the default value of 'spark.master.rest.enabled' to 'false'. |
| CVE-2009-1595 | Medium | 2009-05-11 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The jabber:iq:auth implementation in IQAuthHandler.java in Ignite Realtime Openfire before 3.6.4 allows remote authenticated users to change the passwords of arbitrary accounts via a modified username element in a passwd_change action. |