Overview 11 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
11matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
11
100.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
11
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
11
100.0%
split by
peak 4 / quarter
Q3 212
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q4 210
Q1 220
Q2 220
Q3 220
Q4 220
Q1 230
Q2 230
Q3 230
Q4 230
Q1 240
Q2 240
Q3 240
Q4 240
Q1 250
Q2 251
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 251
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 250
Q1 261
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 260
Q3 262
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q4 264
Not applicable4
High4
not blocked4
No public exploit4
Q4 21Q2 22Q4 22Q2 23Q4 23Q2 24Q4 24Q2 25Q4 25Q2 26Q4 26
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-126624 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unverified ownership in the Windows installer of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.7 allows a local authenticated user to run code as the mail server's service account or as an administrator when setup installs into, or upgrades, a program folder that accounts other than the administrators could write before, such as one made beforehand at the root of a drive. 6.3.7 fixed CVE-2026-107571 by giving the program folder, Bin and ControlPanel permissions that only administrators may change, but setup refused nothing that was already in them, or in the folders that hold the event script, the add-ons and the database scripts: a program, a library, a script or a settings file that another account owns, or whose own permissions let another account change it, is kept with that owner and those permissions, which the hardening of the folders does not take away. Setup then runs programs from Bin with the administrator's elevated rights, and the service, which runs as LocalSystem or as its virtual account, runs them and the event script, so that a library such an account placed in Bin is loaded in place of the system's; the account can still change the file after the installation. The default installation under Program Files is not affected. |
| CVE-2026-88233 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper authorization in Windows Task Scheduler allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-83791 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper authorization in Windows Virtual Input allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-110237 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vifm 0.8.1-beta through 0.14.4 reuses a pre-existing IPC FIFO in the shared temporary directory without checking ownership, allowing local users to execute commands as another user. Attackers can pre-create a world-writable vifm-ipc-vifm FIFO and write IPC packets with -c and ! shell commands that execute with the victim's privileges. |
| CVE-2026-93853 | High | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unverified ownership in Barman snapshot backup deletion allows a principal who can write the backup catalog to cause Barman to delete unrelated cloud snapshots. When a snapshot backup is deleted, either explicitly or by retention policy enforcement, Barman reads the snapshot identifiers from the backup.info file and passes them to the cloud provider's delete API using Barman's own credentials, without verifying that the snapshots belong to that backup. An attacker who can overwrite backup.info but lacks snapshot delete permissions can substitute the identifiers of other snapshots, causing Barman to delete any snapshot its cloud identity can reach on AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud. Exploitation requires a deployment where the principal that writes the backup catalog is separate from the identity Barman uses to delete snapshots. Barman versions from 3.4.0 (Google Cloud), 3.6.0 (Azure), and 3.7.0 (AWS) up to and including 3.20.0 are affected. The issue is fixed in Barman 3.20.1. |
| CVE-2026-54467 | High | 2026-08-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On the Trusted Firmware-M (TF-M) 2 through 2.3.0 platform before 00d1b3e, mailbox initialization on PSOC64 and RP2350 accepts a non-secure, unvalidated, supplied pointer. |
| CVE-2026-29788 | High | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | TSPortal is the WikiTide Foundation’s in-house platform used by the Trust and Safety team to manage reports, investigations, appeals, and transparency work. Prior to version 30, conversion of empty strings to null allows disguising DPA reports as genuine self-deletion reports. This issue has been patched in version 30. |
| CVE-2025-43882 | High | 2025-08-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ThinOS 10, versions prior to 2508_10.0127, contains an Unverified Ownership vulnerability. A local low-privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability leading to Unauthorized Access. |
| CVE-2025-47940 | High | 2025-05-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | TYPO3 is an open source, PHP based web content management system. Starting in version 10.0.0 and prior to versions 10.4.50 ELTS, 11.5.44 ELTS, 12.4.31 LTS, and 13.4.12 LTS, administrator-level backend users without system maintainer privileges can escalate their privileges and gain system maintainer access. Exploiting this vulnerability requires a valid administrator account. Users should update to TYPO3 version 10.4.50 ELTS, 11.5.44 ELTS, 12.4.31 LTS, or 13.4.12 LTS to fix the problem. |
| CVE-2021-24501 | High | 2021-08-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Workreap WordPress theme before 2.2.2 had several AJAX actions missing authorization checks to verify that a user was authorized to perform critical operations such as modifying or deleting objects. This allowed a logged in user to modify or delete objects belonging to other users on the site. |
| CVE-2021-24500 | High | 2021-08-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Several AJAX actions available in the Workreap WordPress theme before 2.2.2 lacked CSRF protections, as well as allowing insecure direct object references that were not validated. This allows an attacker to trick a logged in user to submit a POST request to the vulnerable site, potentially modifying or deleting arbitrary objects on the target site. |