Overview 29 matches · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
29matches
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
29
100.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
29
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
1
3.4%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
28
96.6%
split by
peak 6 / year
20191
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20203
No exploit published3
Medium3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20216
No exploit published6
Medium6
not blocked6
No public exploit6
20225
No exploit published5
Medium5
not blocked5
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit4
20232
No exploit published2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20245
No exploit published5
Medium5
not blocked5
No public exploit5
20255
No exploit published5
Medium5
not blocked5
No public exploit5
20262
No exploit published2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20192020202120222023202420252026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-13591 | Medium | 2026-10-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The authentication endpoint of WSO2 Identity Server fails to provide a consistent system response when a username does not exist in the system, allowing attackers to differentiate between valid and invalid usernames. This difference in responses can be leveraged to enumerate existing user accounts. Successful exploitation enables an attacker to discover valid usernames within the system, significantly increasing the risk of subsequent attacks such as brute force attacks on user credentials, social engineering attacks, and information leakage. The discovered usernames can be used to craft targeted phishing emails or other social engineering campaigns. |
| CVE-2025-5802 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The self-registration flow accepts user-supplied input for usernames without adequately preventing the disclosure of username existence. When a user attempts to register with an existing username, the system responds with an error message that explicitly indicates the username is already in use. This behavior allows an attacker to discover valid usernames within the system. The discovery of valid usernames can facilitate subsequent attacks such as brute force, social engineering, and targeted phishing campaigns. |
| CVE-2025-1396 | Medium | 2025-09-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A username enumeration vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products when Multi-Attribute Login is enabled. In this configuration, the system returns a distinct "User does not exist" error message to the login form, regardless of the validate_username setting. This behavior allows malicious actors to determine which usernames exist in the system based on observable discrepancies in the application's responses. Exploitation of this vulnerability could aid in brute-force attacks, targeted phishing campaigns, or other social engineering techniques by confirming the validity of user identifiers within the system. |
| CVE-2025-43786 | Medium | 2025-09-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Enumeration of ERC from object entry in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.128, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q3.0 through 2024.Q3.1, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.12, 2023.Q4.0 and 7.4 GA through update 92 allow attackers to determine existent ERC in the application by exploit the time response. |
| CVE-2025-43751 | Medium | 2025-08-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | User enumeration vulnerability in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.0 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.14, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10 and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows remote attackers to determine if an account exist in the application via the create account page. |
| CVE-2025-43743 | Medium | 2025-08-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.5, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.15 and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows any authenticated remote user to view other calendars by allowing them to enumerate the names of other users, given an attacker the possibility to send phishing to these users. |
| CVE-2025-43739 | Medium | 2025-08-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.6, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.16 and 7.4 GA through update 92 allow any authenticated user to modify the content of emails sent through the calendar portlet, allowing an attacker to send phishing emails to any other user in the same organization. |
| CVE-2024-21233 | Medium | 2024-10-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Database Core component of Oracle Database Server. Supported versions that are affected are 19.3-19.24, 21.3-21.15 and 23.4-23.5. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker having Create Session privilege with network access via Oracle Net to compromise Oracle Database Core. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Database Core accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2024-21206 | Medium | 2024-10-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Command Center Framework product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Diagnostics). Supported versions that are affected are ECC:11-13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Enterprise Command Center Framework. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Enterprise Command Center Framework accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2024-30171 | Medium | 2024-05-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Bouncy Castle Java TLS API and JSSE Provider before 1.78. Timing-based leakage may occur in RSA based handshakes because of exception processing. |
| CVE-2024-26268 | Medium | 2024-02-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | User enumeration vulnerability in Liferay Portal 7.2.0 through 7.4.3.26, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 7.4 before update 27, 7.3 before update 8, 7.2 before fix pack 20, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to determine if an account exist in the application by comparing the request's response time. |
| CVE-2024-25146 | Medium | 2024-02-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Liferay Portal 7.2.0 through 7.4.1, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 7.3 before service pack 3, 7.2 before fix pack 18, and older unsupported versions returns with different responses depending on whether a site does not exist or if the user does not have permission to access the site, which allows remote attackers to discover the existence of sites by enumerating URLs. This vulnerability occurs if locale.prepend.friendly.url.style=2 and if a custom 404 page is used. |
| CVE-2023-40343 | Medium | 2023-08-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Tuleap Authentication Plugin 1.1.20 and earlier uses a non-constant time comparison function when validating an authentication token allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid authentication token. |
| CVE-2023-25806 | Medium | 2023-03-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | OpenSearch Security is a plugin for OpenSearch that offers encryption, authentication and authorization. There is an observable discrepancy in the authentication response time between calls where the user provided exists and calls where it does not. This issue only affects calls using the internal basic identity provider (IdP), and not other externally configured IdPs. Patches were released in versions 1.3.9 and 2.6.0, there are no workarounds. |
| CVE-2022-40084 | Medium | 2022-10-20 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | OpenCRX before v5.2.2 was discovered to be vulnerable to password enumeration due to the difference in error messages received during a password reset which could enable an attacker to determine if a username, email or ID is valid. |
| CVE-2022-43412 | Medium | 2022-10-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin 1.84.1 and earlier uses a non-constant time comparison function when checking whether the provided and expected webhook token are equal, potentially allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook token. |
| CVE-2022-43411 | Medium | 2022-10-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins GitLab Plugin 1.5.35 and earlier uses a non-constant time comparison function when checking whether the provided and expected webhook token are equal, potentially allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook token. |
| CVE-2022-36885 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins GitHub Plugin 1.34.4 and earlier uses a non-constant time comparison function when checking whether the provided and computed webhook signatures are equal, allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook signature. |
| CVE-2022-23106 | Medium | 2022-01-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Configuration as Code Plugin 1.55 and earlier used a non-constant time comparison function when validating an authentication token allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid authentication token. |
| CVE-2021-3642 | Medium | 2021-08-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Wildfly Elytron in versions prior to 1.10.14.Final, prior to 1.15.5.Final and prior to 1.16.1.Final where ScramServer may be susceptible to Timing Attack if enabled. The highest threat of this vulnerability is confidentiality. |
| CVE-2020-15522 | Medium | 2021-05-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Bouncy Castle BC Java before 1.66, BC C# .NET before 1.8.7, BC-FJA before 1.0.1.2, 1.0.2.1, and BC-FNA before 1.0.1.1 have a timing issue within the EC math library that can expose information about the private key when an attacker is able to observe timing information for the generation of multiple deterministic ECDSA signatures. |
| CVE-2021-31406 | Medium | 2021-04-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Non-constant-time comparison of CSRF tokens in endpoint request handler in com.vaadin:flow-server versions 3.0.0 through 5.0.3 (Vaadin 15.0.0 through 18.0.6), and com.vaadin:fusion-endpoint version 6.0.0 (Vaadin 19.0.0) allows attacker to guess a security token for Fusion endpoints via timing attack. |
| CVE-2021-31404 | Medium | 2021-04-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Non-constant-time comparison of CSRF tokens in UIDL request handler in com.vaadin:flow-server versions 1.0.0 through 1.0.13 (Vaadin 10.0.0 through 10.0.16), 1.1.0 prior to 2.0.0 (Vaadin 11 prior to 14), 2.0.0 through 2.4.6 (Vaadin 14.0.0 through 14.4.6), 3.0.0 prior to 5.0.0 (Vaadin 15 prior to 18), and 5.0.0 through 5.0.2 (Vaadin 18.0.0 through 18.0.5) allows attacker to guess a security token via timing attack. |
| CVE-2021-31403 | Medium | 2021-04-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Non-constant-time comparison of CSRF tokens in UIDL request handler in com.vaadin:vaadin-server versions 7.0.0 through 7.7.23 (Vaadin 7.0.0 through 7.7.23), and 8.0.0 through 8.12.2 (Vaadin 8.0.0 through 8.12.2) allows attacker to guess a security token via timing attack |
| CVE-2020-1926 | Medium | 2021-03-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Hive cookie signature verification used a non constant time comparison which is known to be vulnerable to timing attacks. This could allow recovery of another users cookie signature. The issue was addressed in Apache Hive 2.3.8 |
| CVE-2020-26939 | Medium | 2020-11-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC before 1.61 and BC-FJA before 1.0.1.2, attackers can obtain sensitive information about a private exponent because of Observable Differences in Behavior to Error Inputs. This occurs in org.bouncycastle.crypto.encodings.OAEPEncoding. Sending invalid ciphertext that decrypts to a short payload in the OAEP Decoder could result in the throwing of an early exception, potentially leaking some information about the private exponent of the RSA private key performing the encryption. |
| CVE-2020-2102 | Medium | 2020-01-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins 2.218 and earlier, LTS 2.204.1 and earlier used a non-constant time comparison function when validating an HMAC. |
| CVE-2020-2101 | Medium | 2020-01-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins 2.218 and earlier, LTS 2.204.1 and earlier did not use a constant-time comparison function for validating connection secrets, which could potentially allow an attacker to use a timing attack to obtain this secret. |
| CVE-2019-3739 | Medium | 2019-09-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys. |