Overview 30 matches · 19 protected · 19 exploited · 11 CISA KEV · 27 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
20
66.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
10
33.3%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
19
63.3%
partly blocked
1
3.3%
not blocked
10
33.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
19
63.3%
Working exploit published
10
33.3%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
1
3.3%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 4 / year
20061
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20070
20080
20090
20101
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20111
Mitigation candidate1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20122
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20132
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20142
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
High2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20151
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
20164
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate2
Critical2
High2
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked2
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
Forecast only1
20173
Protected by Waratek3
Critical3
blocked by ARMR today3
Exploited3
20184
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate1
Critical2
High2
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked1
Exploited3
Working exploit published1
20191
Protected by Waratek1
High1
partly blocked1
Exploited1
20202
Mitigation candidate2
Critical2
not blocked2
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20213
Protected by Waratek3
Critical1
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today3
Exploited3
20221
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20230
20241
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20250
20261
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-34197 | High | 2026-04-07 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Improper Input Validation, Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ. Apache ActiveMQ Classic exposes the Jolokia JMX-HTTP bridge at /api/jolokia/ on the web console. The default Jolokia access policy permits exec operations on all ActiveMQ MBeans (org.apache.activemq:*), including BrokerService.addNetworkConnector(String) and BrokerService.addConnector(String). An authenticated attacker can invoke these operations with a crafted discovery URI that triggers the VM transport's brokerConfig parameter to load a remote Spring XML application context using ResourceXmlApplicationContext. Because Spring's ResourceXmlApplicationContext instantiates all singleton beans before the BrokerService validates the configuration, arbitrary code execution occurs on the broker's JVM through bean factory methods such as Runtime.exec(). This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Broker: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.3; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.3; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.19.4 or 6.2.3, which fixes the issue |
| CVE-2024-5276 | Critical | 2024-06-25 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A SQL Injection vulnerability in Fortra FileCatalyst Workflow allows an attacker to modify application data. Likely impacts include creation of administrative users and deletion or modification of data in the application database. Data exfiltration via SQL injection is not possible using this vulnerability. Successful unauthenticated exploitation requires a Workflow system with anonymous access enabled, otherwise an authenticated user is required. This issue affects all versions of FileCatalyst Workflow from 5.1.6 Build 135 and earlier. |
| CVE-2022-1471 | Critical | 2022-12-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | SnakeYaml's Constructor() class does not restrict types which can be instantiated during deserialization. Deserializing yaml content provided by an attacker can lead to remote code execution. We recommend using SnakeYaml's SafeConsturctor when parsing untrusted content to restrict deserialization. We recommend upgrading to version 2.0 and beyond. |
| CVE-2021-44832 | Medium | 2021-12-28 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-beta7 through 2.17.0 (excluding security fix releases 2.3.2 and 2.12.4) are vulnerable to a remote code execution (RCE) attack when a configuration uses a JDBC Appender with a JNDI LDAP data source URI when an attacker has control of the target LDAP server. This issue is fixed by limiting JNDI data source names to the java protocol in Log4j2 versions 2.17.1, 2.12.4, and 2.3.2. |
| CVE-2021-45105 | Medium | 2021-12-18 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. |
| CVE-2021-44228 | Critical | 2021-12-10 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. |
| CVE-2020-13942 | Critical | 2020-11-24 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | It is possible to inject malicious OGNL or MVEL scripts into the /context.json public endpoint. This was partially fixed in 1.5.1 but a new attack vector was found. In Apache Unomi version 1.5.2 scripts are now completely filtered from the input. It is highly recommended to upgrade to the latest available version of the 1.5.x release to fix this problem. |
| CVE-2014-9390 | Critical | 2020-02-12 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Git before 1.8.5.6, 1.9.x before 1.9.5, 2.0.x before 2.0.5, 2.1.x before 2.1.4, and 2.2.x before 2.2.1 on Windows and OS X; Mercurial before 3.2.3 on Windows and OS X; Apple Xcode before 6.2 beta 3; mine all versions before 08-12-2014; libgit2 all versions up to 0.21.2; Egit all versions before 08-12-2014; and JGit all versions before 08-12-2014 allow remote Git servers to execute arbitrary commands via a tree containing a crafted .git/config file with (1) an ignorable Unicode codepoint, (2) a git~1/config representation, or (3) mixed case that is improperly handled on a case-insensitive filesystem. |
| CVE-2019-17558 | High | 2019-12-30 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Solr 5.0.0 to Apache Solr 8.3.1 are vulnerable to a Remote Code Execution through the VelocityResponseWriter. A Velocity template can be provided through Velocity templates in a configset `velocity/` directory or as a parameter. A user defined configset could contain renderable, potentially malicious, templates. Parameter provided templates are disabled by default, but can be enabled by setting `params.resource.loader.enabled` by defining a response writer with that setting set to `true`. Defining a response writer requires configuration API access. Solr 8.4 removed the params resource loader entirely, and only enables the configset-provided template rendering when the configset is `trusted` (has been uploaded by an authenticated user). |
| CVE-2018-11776 | High | 2018-08-22 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts versions 2.3 to 2.3.34 and 2.5 to 2.5.16 suffer from possible Remote Code Execution when alwaysSelectFullNamespace is true (either by user or a plugin like Convention Plugin) and then: results are used with no namespace and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace and similar to results, same possibility when using url tag which doesn't have value and action set and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace. |
| CVE-2018-1999002 | High | 2018-07-23 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | A arbitrary file read vulnerability exists in Jenkins 2.132 and earlier, 2.121.1 and earlier in the Stapler web framework's org/kohsuke/stapler/Stapler.java that allows attackers to send crafted HTTP requests returning the contents of any file on the Jenkins master file system that the Jenkins master has access to. |
| CVE-2018-1273 | Critical | 2018-04-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Spring Data Commons, versions prior to 1.13 to 1.13.10, 2.0 to 2.0.5, and older unsupported versions, contain a property binder vulnerability caused by improper neutralization of special elements. An unauthenticated remote malicious user (or attacker) can supply specially crafted request parameters against Spring Data REST backed HTTP resources or using Spring Data's projection-based request payload binding hat can lead to a remote code execution attack. |
| CVE-2017-8046 | Critical | 2018-01-04 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Malicious PATCH requests submitted to servers using Spring Data REST versions prior to 2.6.9 (Ingalls SR9), versions prior to 3.0.1 (Kay SR1) and Spring Boot versions prior to 1.5.9, 2.0 M6 can use specially crafted JSON data to run arbitrary Java code. |
| CVE-2017-12611 | Critical | 2017-09-20 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.33 and 2.5 through 2.5.10.1, using an unintentional expression in a Freemarker tag instead of string literals can lead to a RCE attack. |
| CVE-2017-9791 | Critical | 2017-07-10 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Struts 1 plugin in Apache Struts 2.1.x and 2.3.x might allow remote code execution via a malicious field value passed in a raw message to the ActionMessage. |
| CVE-2017-5638 | Critical | 2017-03-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Jakarta Multipart parser in Apache Struts 2 2.3.x before 2.3.32 and 2.5.x before 2.5.10.1 has incorrect exception handling and error-message generation during file-upload attempts, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted Content-Type, Content-Disposition, or Content-Length HTTP header, as exploited in the wild in March 2017 with a Content-Type header containing a #cmd= string. |
| CVE-2016-3087 | Critical | 2016-06-07 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to an ! (exclamation mark) operator to the REST Plugin. |
| CVE-2016-3088 | Critical | 2016-06-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Fileserver web application in Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.14.0 allows remote attackers to upload and execute arbitrary files via an HTTP PUT followed by an HTTP MOVE request. |
| CVE-2016-2510 | High | 2016-04-07 | Protected by Waratek | Forecast only | BeanShell (bsh) before 2.0b6, when included on the classpath by an application that uses Java serialization or XStream, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data, related to XThis.Handler. |
| CVE-2016-0792 | High | 2016-04-07 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple unspecified API endpoints in Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via serialized data in an XML file, related to XStream and groovy.util.Expando. |
| CVE-2015-1833 | Medium | 2015-05-29 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Apache Jackrabbit before 2.0.6, 2.2.x before 2.2.14, 2.4.x before 2.4.6, 2.6.x before 2.6.6, 2.8.x before 2.8.1, and 2.10.x before 2.10.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files and send requests to intranet servers via a crafted WebDAV request. |
| CVE-2014-0114 | High | 2014-04-30 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Commons BeanUtils, as distributed in lib/commons-beanutils-1.8.0.jar in Apache Struts 1.x through 1.3.10 and in other products requiring commons-beanutils through 1.9.2, does not suppress the class property, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code via the class parameter, as demonstrated by the passing of this parameter to the getClass method of the ActionForm object in Struts 1. |
| CVE-2014-0050 | High | 2014-04-01 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | MultipartStream.java in Apache Commons FileUpload before 1.3.1, as used in Apache Tomcat, JBoss Web, and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU consumption) via a crafted Content-Type header that bypasses a loop's intended exit conditions. |
| CVE-2013-2251 | Critical | 2013-07-20 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL expressions via a parameter with a crafted (1) action:, (2) redirect:, or (3) redirectAction: prefix. |
| CVE-2013-2248 | Medium | 2013-07-20 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple open redirect vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15 allow remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in a parameter using the (1) redirect: or (2) redirectAction: prefix. |
| CVE-2012-0391 | Critical | 2012-01-08 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during certain exception handling for mismatched data types of properties, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code via a crafted parameter. |
| CVE-2011-4858 | Medium | 2012-01-05 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Tomcat before 5.5.35, 6.x before 6.0.35, and 7.x before 7.0.23 computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters. |
| CVE-2011-5034 | High | 2011-12-30 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Geronimo 2.2.1 and earlier computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters. NOTE: this might overlap CVE-2011-4461. |
| CVE-2010-1587 | Medium | 2010-04-28 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The Jetty ResourceHandler in Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.3.2 and 5.4.x before 5.4.0 allows remote attackers to read JSP source code via a // (slash slash) initial substring in a URI for (1) admin/index.jsp, (2) admin/queues.jsp, or (3) admin/topics.jsp. |
| CVE-2006-1547 | High | 2006-03-30 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | ActionForm in Apache Software Foundation (ASF) Struts before 1.2.9 with BeanUtils 1.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a multipart/form-data encoded form with a parameter name that references the public getMultipartRequestHandler method, which provides further access to elements in the CommonsMultipartRequestHandler implementation and BeanUtils. |