WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕CWE CWE-1325✕
Overview 1 match · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC
1match 0in Waratek scope0.0% 0protected0.0% 0exploited0.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 0public PoC0.0%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 1 100.0% Not applicable 0 0.0% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 0 0.0% Medium 1 100.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 1 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 0 0.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 1 100.0% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 1 / month
Outside Waratek scope: 1 Medium: 1 not blocked: 1 Forecast only: 1
Apr 24
1 match Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2024-2511 Medium 2024-04-08 Outside Waratek scope Forecast only Issue summary: Some non-default TLS server configurations can cause unbounded memory growth when processing TLSv1.3 sessions Impact summary: An attacker may exploit certain server configurations to trigger unbounded memory growth that would lead to a Denial of Service This problem can occur in TLSv1.3 if the non-default SSL_OP_NO_TICKET option is being used (but not if early_data support is also configured and the default anti-replay protection is in use). In this case, under certain conditions, the session cache can get into an incorrect state and it will fail to flush properly as it fills. The session cache will continue to grow in an unbounded manner. A malicious client could deliberately create the scenario for this failure to force a Denial of Service. It may also happen by accident in normal operation. This issue only affects TLS servers supporting TLSv1.3. It does not affect TLS clients. The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is also not affected by this issue.