Overview 14 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC
14matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
7.1%
Not applicable
13
92.9%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
14
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
14
100.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 3 / year
20172
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Forecast only2
20181
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
20190
20203
Not applicable3
Critical3
not blocked3
Forecast only3
20212
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
Forecast only2
20221
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
20233
Not applicable3
High3
not blocked3
Forecast only3
20241
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
20251
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
201720182019202020212022202320242025
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-29971 | High | 2025-05-13 | Not applicable | Forecast only | Out-of-bounds read in Web Threat Defense (WTD.sys) allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. |
| CVE-2024-26594 | Critical | 2024-02-23 | Not applicable | Forecast only | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate mech token in session setup If client send invalid mech token in session setup request, ksmbd validate and make the error if it is invalid. |
| CVE-2023-49285 | High | 2023-12-04 | Not applicable | Forecast only | Squid is a caching proxy for the Web supporting HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more. Due to a Buffer Overread bug Squid is vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack against Squid HTTP Message processing. This bug is fixed by Squid version 6.5. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-32029 | High | 2023-06-14 | Not applicable | Forecast only | Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-21769 | High | 2023-04-11 | Not applicable | Forecast only | Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-47938 | Medium | 2022-12-23 | Not applicable | Forecast only | An issue was discovered in ksmbd in the Linux kernel 5.15 through 5.19 before 5.19.2. fs/ksmbd/smb2misc.c has an out-of-bounds read and OOPS for SMB2_TREE_CONNECT. |
| CVE-2021-36160 | High | 2021-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | A carefully crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy_uwsgi to read above the allocated memory and crash (DoS). This issue affects Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.30 to 2.4.48 (inclusive). |
| CVE-2021-25216 | Critical | 2021-04-29 | Not applicable | Forecast only | In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security. |
| CVE-2020-25110 | Critical | 2020-12-11 | Not applicable | Forecast only | An issue was discovered in the DNS implementation in Ethernut in Nut/OS 5.1. The length byte of a domain name in a DNS query/response is not checked, and is used for internal memory operations. This may lead to successful Denial-of-Service, and possibly Remote Code Execution. |
| CVE-2020-25109 | Critical | 2020-12-11 | Not applicable | Forecast only | An issue was discovered in the DNS implementation in Ethernut in Nut/OS 5.1. The number of DNS queries/responses (set in a DNS header) is not checked against the data present. This may lead to successful Denial-of-Service, and possibly Remote Code Execution. |
| CVE-2020-25107 | Critical | 2020-12-11 | Not applicable | Forecast only | An issue was discovered in the DNS implementation in Ethernut in Nut/OS 5.1. There is no check on whether a domain name has '\0' termination. This may lead to successful Denial-of-Service, and possibly Remote Code Execution. |
| CVE-2018-16855 | High | 2018-12-03 | Not applicable | Forecast only | An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor before version 4.1.8 where a remote attacker sending a DNS query can trigger an out-of-bounds memory read while computing the hash of the query for a packet cache lookup, possibly leading to a crash. |
| CVE-2017-3737 | Medium | 2017-12-07 | Not applicable | Forecast only | OpenSSL 1.0.2 (starting from version 1.0.2b) introduced an "error state" mechanism. The intent was that if a fatal error occurred during a handshake then OpenSSL would move into the error state and would immediately fail if you attempted to continue the handshake. This works as designed for the explicit handshake functions (SSL_do_handshake(), SSL_accept() and SSL_connect()), however due to a bug it does not work correctly if SSL_read() or SSL_write() is called directly. In that scenario, if the handshake fails then a fatal error will be returned in the initial function call. If SSL_read()/SSL_write() is subsequently called by the application for the same SSL object then it will succeed and the data is passed without being decrypted/encrypted directly from the SSL/TLS record layer. In order to exploit this issue an application bug would have to be present that resulted in a call to SSL_read()/SSL_write() being issued after having already received a fatal error. OpenSSL version 1.0.2b-1.0.2m are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. OpenSSL 1.1.0 is not affected. |
| CVE-2017-3731 | High | 2017-05-04 | Not applicable | Forecast only | If an SSL/TLS server or client is running on a 32-bit host, and a specific cipher is being used, then a truncated packet can cause that server or client to perform an out-of-bounds read, usually resulting in a crash. For OpenSSL 1.1.0, the crash can be triggered when using CHACHA20/POLY1305; users should upgrade to 1.1.0d. For Openssl 1.0.2, the crash can be triggered when using RC4-MD5; users who have not disabled that algorithm should update to 1.0.2k. |