WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Oracle product: Oracle Database Server / Workload Manager (Apache Tomcat)✕
Overview 4 matches · 3 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
4matches 3in Waratek scope75.0% 0protected0.0% 0exploited0.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 1public PoC25.0% 2EPSS ≥ 0.550.0%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 1 25.0% No exploit published 2 50.0% Outside Waratek scope 1 25.0% Not applicable 0 0.0% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 3 75.0% Medium 1 25.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 4 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
split by peak 1 / quarter
Q2 19Q3 19Q4 19Q1 20Q2 20Q3 20Q4 20
4 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2020-17527 High 2020-12-03 No exploit published No public exploit While investigating bug 64830 it was discovered that Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M9, 9.0.0-M1 to 9.0.39 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.59 could re-use an HTTP request header value from the previous stream received on an HTTP/2 connection for the request associated with the subsequent stream. While this would most likely lead to an error and the closure of the HTTP/2 connection, it is possible that information could leak between requests.
CVE-2020-13935 High 2020-07-14 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated in Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56 and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service.
CVE-2019-17569 Medium 2020-02-24 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit The refactoring present in Apache Tomcat 9.0.28 to 9.0.30, 8.5.48 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.98 to 7.0.99 introduced a regression. The result of the regression was that invalid Transfer-Encoding headers were incorrectly processed leading to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely.
CVE-2019-10072 High 2019-06-21 No exploit published Forecast only The fix for CVE-2019-0199 was incomplete and did not address HTTP/2 connection window exhaustion on write in Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.19 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.40 . By not sending WINDOW_UPDATE messages for the connection window (stream 0) clients were able to cause server-side threads to block eventually leading to thread exhaustion and a DoS.