Overview 5 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
5matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
1public PoC20.0%
1EPSS ≥ 0.520.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
20.0%
Not applicable
4
80.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
5
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
1
20.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
4
80.0%
split by
peak 1 / quarter
Q2 161
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 161
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 160
Q1 170
Q2 170
Q3 170
Q4 170
Q1 181
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 180
Q3 180
Q4 180
Q1 190
Q2 190
Q3 191
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 190
Q1 200
Q2 201
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q2 16Q4 16Q2 17Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-1967 | High | 2020-04-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f). |
| CVE-2019-1549 | Medium | 2019-09-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). |
| CVE-2018-0739 | Medium | 2018-03-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Constructed ASN.1 types with a recursive definition (such as can be found in PKCS7) could eventually exceed the stack given malicious input with excessive recursion. This could result in a Denial Of Service attack. There are no such structures used within SSL/TLS that come from untrusted sources so this is considered safe. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0h (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0g). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2o (Affected 1.0.2b-1.0.2n). |
| CVE-2016-6303 | Critical | 2016-09-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Integer overflow in the MDC2_Update function in crypto/mdc2/mdc2dgst.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-2176 | High | 2016-05-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The X509_NAME_oneline function in crypto/x509/x509_obj.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process stack memory or cause a denial of service (buffer over-read) via crafted EBCDIC ASN.1 data. |