WaratekVRT Sign in

Medium Oracle MySQL Monitoring: General (Apache Tomcat) CVEs

3 CVEs, 1 exploited, 1 protected by Waratek

Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Oracle product: Oracle MySQL / Monitoring: General (Apache Tomcat)✕
Overview 3 matches · 1 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Critical 0 0.0% High 0 0.0% Medium 3 100.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 1 33.3% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 2 66.7% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 1 33.3% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 1 33.3% Forecast only 1 33.3% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 1 / quarter
Q3 21Q4 21Q1 22Q2 22Q3 22Q4 22Q1 23Q2 23Q3 23
3 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2023-41080 Medium 2023-08-25 Mitigation candidate Proof of concept only URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability in FORM authentication feature Apache Tomcat.This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.0-M10, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.0.12, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.79 and from 8.5.0 through 8.5.92. Older, EOL versions may also be affected. The vulnerability is limited to the ROOT (default) web application.
CVE-2022-34305 Medium 2022-06-23 Protected by Waratek Exploited In Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.0-M16, 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.22, 9.0.30 to 9.0.64 and 8.5.50 to 8.5.81 the Form authentication example in the examples web application displayed user provided data without filtering, exposing a XSS vulnerability.
CVE-2021-33037 Medium 2021-07-12 No exploit published Forecast only Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding.