High Java SE and Java for Business Java 2D CVEs
4 CVEs
Overview 4 matches · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
25.0%
No exploit published
3
75.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
1
25.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
3
75.0%
split by
peak 4 / month
Apr 10
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2010-0850 | High | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java 2D component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-0849 | High | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java 2D component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is a heap-based buffer overflow in a decoding routine used by the JPEGImageDecoderImpl interface, which allows code execution via a crafted JPEG image. |
| CVE-2010-0848 | High | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java 2D component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-0838 | High | 2010-04-01 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java 2D component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0, Update, and 23 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is a stack-based buffer overflow using an untrusted size value in the readMabCurveData function in the CMM module in the JVM. |