Overview 4 matches · 3 in Waratek scope · 2 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
4matches
3in Waratek scope75.0%
2protected50.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
1public PoC25.0%
1EPSS ≥ 0.525.0%
Protected by Waratek
2
50.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
1
25.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
25.0%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
2
50.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
2
50.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
1
25.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
3
75.0%
split by
peak 1 / quarter
Q1 201
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q2 200
Q3 201
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 200
Q1 210
Q2 211
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q3 210
Q4 210
Q1 220
Q2 220
Q3 220
Q4 220
Q1 230
Q2 230
Q3 230
Q4 230
Q1 240
Q2 241
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21Q2 22Q4 22Q2 23Q4 23Q2 24
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-22262 | High | 2024-04-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Applications that use UriComponentsBuilder to parse an externally provided URL (e.g. through a query parameter) AND perform validation checks on the host of the parsed URL may be vulnerable to a open redirect https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/601.html attack or to a SSRF attack if the URL is used after passing validation checks. This is the same as CVE-2024-22259 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22259 and CVE-2024-22243 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22243 , but with different input. |
| CVE-2021-22118 | High | 2021-05-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.15 and versions 5.3.x prior to 5.3.7, a WebFlux application is vulnerable to a privilege escalation: by (re)creating the temporary storage directory, a locally authenticated malicious user can read or modify files that have been uploaded to the WebFlux application, or overwrite arbitrary files with multipart request data. |
| CVE-2020-5421 | Medium | 2020-09-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Spring Framework versions 5.2.0 - 5.2.8, 5.1.0 - 5.1.17, 5.0.0 - 5.0.18, 4.3.0 - 4.3.28, and older unsupported versions, the protections against RFD attacks from CVE-2015-5211 may be bypassed depending on the browser used through the use of a jsessionid path parameter. |
| CVE-2020-5398 | High | 2020-01-17 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a "Content-Disposition" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input. |