Overview 109 matches · 102 protected · 70 exploited · 48 CISA KEV · 77 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
109
100.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
102
93.6%
partly blocked
7
6.4%
not blocked
0
0.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
70
64.2%
Working exploit published
15
13.8%
Proof of concept only
24
22.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 21 / year
20102
Protected by Waratek2
High1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited2
20112
Protected by Waratek2
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today2
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
20121
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20133
Protected by Waratek3
Critical1
High1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today3
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
20142
Protected by Waratek2
High2
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20152
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20165
Protected by Waratek5
Critical2
High3
blocked by ARMR today4
partly blocked1
Exploited3
Working exploit published2
20178
Protected by Waratek8
Critical3
High5
blocked by ARMR today6
partly blocked2
Exploited8
201811
Protected by Waratek11
Critical9
High2
blocked by ARMR today10
partly blocked1
Exploited8
Proof of concept only3
201914
Protected by Waratek14
Critical7
High6
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today12
partly blocked2
Exploited8
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only4
202021
Protected by Waratek21
Critical14
High6
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today21
Exploited14
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only5
202110
Protected by Waratek10
Critical8
High2
blocked by ARMR today10
Exploited5
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only4
20226
Protected by Waratek6
Critical5
High1
blocked by ARMR today6
Exploited3
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only2
20239
Protected by Waratek9
Critical3
High5
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today9
Exploited4
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only3
20242
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today1
partly blocked1
Exploited2
20254
Protected by Waratek4
Critical4
blocked by ARMR today4
Exploited3
Proof of concept only1
20267
Protected by Waratek7
Critical4
High3
blocked by ARMR today7
Exploited5
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-1216 | High | 2014-04-22 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | FitNesse Wiki 20131110, 20140201, and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands by defining a COMMAND_PATTERN and TEST_RUNNER in the pageContent parameter when editing a page. |
| CVE-2013-6366 | Medium | 2013-11-04 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | The Groovy script console in VMware Hyperic HQ 4.6.6 allows remote authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary code via a Runtime.getRuntime().exec call. |
| CVE-2013-2251 | Critical | 2013-07-20 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL expressions via a parameter with a crafted (1) action:, (2) redirect:, or (3) redirectAction: prefix. |
| CVE-2013-1965 | High | 2013-07-10 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts Showcase App 2.0.0 through 2.3.13, as used in Struts 2 before 2.3.14.3, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted parameter name that is not properly handled when invoking a redirect. |
| CVE-2012-0391 | Critical | 2012-01-08 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during certain exception handling for mismatched data types of properties, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code via a crafted parameter. |
| CVE-2011-2894 | Medium | 2011-10-04 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | Spring Framework 3.0.0 through 3.0.5, Spring Security 3.0.0 through 3.0.5 and 2.0.0 through 2.0.6, and possibly other versions deserialize objects from untrusted sources, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended security restrictions and execute untrusted code by (1) serializing a java.lang.Proxy instance and using InvocationHandler, or (2) accessing internal AOP interfaces, as demonstrated using deserialization of a DefaultListableBeanFactory instance to execute arbitrary commands via the java.lang.Runtime class. |
| CVE-2011-1571 | Medium | 2011-05-07 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Unspecified vulnerability in the XSL Content portlet in Liferay Portal Community Edition (CE) 5.x and 6.x before 6.0.6 GA, when Apache Tomcat is used, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-1871 | High | 2010-08-05 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for JBoss Expression Language (EL) expressions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when the Java Security Manager is not properly configured. |
| CVE-2010-0738 | Medium | 2010-04-28 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The JMX-Console web application in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to send requests to this application's GET handler by using a different method. |