Overview 4,021 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 1,565 exploited · 826 CISA KEV · 3,043 public PoC
4,021matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
1,565exploited38.9%
826CISA KEV20.5%
3,043public PoC75.7%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
185
4.6%
Not applicable
3,836
95.4%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4,021
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1,565
38.9%
Working exploit published
1,547
38.5%
Proof of concept only
136
3.4%
Forecast only
773
19.2%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 380 / year
19962
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
Forecast only1
19976
Not applicable6
High2
Medium2
Low2
not blocked6
Working exploit published4
Forecast only2
19984
Not applicable4
High2
Medium2
not blocked4
Exploited1
Working exploit published3
19996
Not applicable6
High5
Medium1
not blocked6
Working exploit published6
200020
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable19
High9
Medium9
Low2
not blocked20
Exploited2
Working exploit published17
Forecast only1
200127
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable26
High20
Medium7
not blocked27
Exploited6
Working exploit published19
Forecast only2
200232
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable30
Critical1
High25
Medium5
Low1
not blocked32
Exploited2
Working exploit published23
Forecast only7
200336
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable35
Critical2
High27
Medium6
Low1
not blocked36
Exploited6
Working exploit published29
Forecast only1
200461
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable60
Critical1
High43
Medium16
Low1
not blocked61
Exploited8
Working exploit published52
Forecast only1
200593
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable92
Critical1
High67
Medium24
Low1
not blocked93
Exploited11
Working exploit published71
Forecast only11
2006105
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable104
High80
Medium23
Low2
not blocked105
Exploited10
Working exploit published89
Forecast only6
2007116
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable115
Critical2
High89
Medium25
not blocked116
Exploited10
Working exploit published101
Forecast only5
200888
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable84
Critical2
High72
Medium14
not blocked88
Exploited11
Working exploit published68
Forecast only9
200982
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable81
Critical3
High69
Medium9
Low1
not blocked82
Exploited28
Working exploit published51
Forecast only3
201091
Outside Waratek scope10
Not applicable81
Critical5
High75
Medium11
not blocked91
Exploited30
Working exploit published53
Forecast only8
201179
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable75
Critical3
High62
Medium14
not blocked79
Exploited16
Working exploit published58
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only4
2012125
Outside Waratek scope11
Not applicable114
Critical7
High60
Medium58
not blocked125
Exploited25
Working exploit published52
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only46
2013110
Outside Waratek scope8
Not applicable102
Critical7
High83
Medium18
Low2
not blocked110
Exploited40
Working exploit published50
Forecast only20
2014125
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable121
Critical9
High87
Medium28
Low1
not blocked125
Exploited41
Working exploit published68
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only14
2015128
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable122
Critical11
High91
Medium24
Low2
not blocked128
Exploited46
Working exploit published62
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only19
2016109
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable105
Critical25
High67
Medium14
Low3
not blocked109
Exploited35
Working exploit published45
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only27
2017226
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable220
Critical79
High136
Medium11
not blocked226
Exploited76
Working exploit published126
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only22
2018241
Outside Waratek scope14
Not applicable227
Critical97
High118
Medium26
not blocked241
Exploited84
Working exploit published122
Proof of concept only3
Forecast only32
2019242
Outside Waratek scope23
Not applicable219
Critical112
High99
Medium31
not blocked242
Exploited117
Working exploit published71
Proof of concept only5
Forecast only49
2020278
Outside Waratek scope25
Not applicable253
Critical146
High105
Medium27
not blocked278
Exploited118
Working exploit published96
Proof of concept only6
Forecast only58
2021380
Outside Waratek scope26
Not applicable354
Critical155
High164
Medium61
not blocked380
Exploited173
Working exploit published54
Proof of concept only10
Forecast only143
2022267
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable262
Critical130
High95
Medium42
not blocked267
Exploited106
Working exploit published50
Proof of concept only30
Forecast only81
2023353
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable347
Critical157
High141
Medium54
Low1
not blocked353
Exploited168
Working exploit published48
Proof of concept only35
Forecast only102
2024314
Outside Waratek scope9
Not applicable305
Critical161
High131
Medium22
not blocked314
Exploited167
Working exploit published42
Proof of concept only27
Forecast only78
2025177
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable171
Critical109
High49
Medium18
Low1
not blocked177
Exploited139
Working exploit published14
Proof of concept only8
Forecast only16
202698
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable94
Critical73
High22
Medium3
not blocked98
Exploited89
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only5
19961999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-111497 | Critical | 2026-10-22 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | A buffer overflow vulnerability in the Brotli decoder (c/dec/decode.c) in Google Brotli versions 1.0.3 through 1.2.0 on all platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to corrupt adjacent decoder state memory, disclose sensitive memory contents, cause a denial of service, or potentially execute arbitrary code using a crafted Brotli-compressed stream. Users need to update any Brotli libraries or binaries between 1.0.3 through 1.2.0 to the latest available version: 1.0.10 or 1.1.1 or 1.2.1. |
| CVE-2026-109619 | Critical | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | Exploited | PHP has various global state that temporarily points into request memory. In some scenarios, global state may not be correctly reset, or may be repopulated after being reset. The global state may then refer to request memory even after it has been freed. Subsequent requests may read or branch on this stale state before it is fully initialized. Multiple strategies can trigger this condition and produce remote code execution (RCE). |
| CVE-2026-109618 | Critical | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | Exploited | PHP uses longjmp() for out-of-memory (OOM) errors to exit the current context and abort handling of the request. Some contexts may not properly account for this scenario and leave request memory in an uninitialized state before performing an allocation. The subsequent request cleanup procedure may read or branch on this memory. Multiple OOM strategies can consistently trigger this condition and lead to remote code execution (RCE). |
| CVE-2026-102764 | Critical | 2026-10-15 | Not applicable | Exploited | The vulnerability exists within internal components of BeyondTrust’s Remote Support product. The components did not adequately validate the origin of the messages it received. Under the right conditions, this could allow an attacker to perform file operations on the appliance. |
| CVE-2026-110447 | Critical | 2026-10-14 | Not applicable | Exploited | Collabora Online Built-in CODE Server before 26.4.303 (richdocumentscode), a Nextcloud app, allows remote code execution, as exploited in the wild in September and October 2026, a different vulnerability than CVE-2025-66208. This is an OS command injection in proxy.php when the CODE server isn't running (e.g., the product was recently restarted). The vulnerability is not present in standalone Collabora Online servers; only this deployment with CODE Server is affected. |
| CVE-2026-97229 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | Exploited | GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 19.2 before 19.2.8, 19.3 before 19.3.5, and 19.4 before 19.4.2 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the GitLab server via a specially crafted regular expression in a CI/CD configuration, due to insufficient regular expression validation. |
| CVE-2026-104935 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | Exploited | Authentication bypass by spoofing in ICS before version 25.1.3.0 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands. This does not impact ICS version 22.7R2.14 or prior. |
| CVE-2026-21589 | Critical | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | Exploited | This is a vulnerability in Bitbucket Data Center, Confluence Data Center, Jira Service Management Data Center, Jira Software Data Center, Bamboo Data Center. Crowd Data Center, Crucible and Fisheye. This Arbitrary File Access vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to access specific files within the web application root directory in affected versions. Exploitation requires prior knowledge of the target file's exact name and path; this vulnerability does not allow attackers to enumerate or list directory contents. In some configurations, there may be some sensitive files that make this highly severe. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to access specific files within the web application root directory in affected versions. The vulnerability must be addressed for affected versions of: -- Bitbucket Data Center, introduced in version >= 4.6.0, fix versions: 9.4.26, 10.2.8, 10.5.1 -- Confluence Data Center, introduced in version >= 5.10.0, fix versions 9.2.26, 10.2.19 -- Crowd Data Center, introduced in version >= 2.11.0, fix versions 6.3.7, 7.0.3, 7.1.7, 7.2.4 -- Jira Software Data Center, introduced in version >= 7.1.0, fix versions 9.12.40, 10.3.26, 11.3.12 -- Jira Service Management Data Center, introduced in version >= 3.1.0, fix versions 5.12.40, 10.3.26, 11.3.12 -- Bamboo Data Center >= 7.0.1, fix versions 10.2.24, 12.1.12 -- Crucible, fix versions 4.9.15 -- Fisheye, fix version 4.9.15 -- Exploitation requires prior knowledge of the target file's exact name and path. The vulnerability does not include the capability to enumerate or list directory contents. |
| CVE-2026-105134 | Critical | 2026-10-04 | Not applicable | Exploited | A flaw has been found in Ahsay AhsayCBS up to 9.15.2.69/10.3.4.44. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /rps/api/json/UpdateReceivers.do of the component Replication Receiver. Executing a manipulation of the argument random can lead to os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. Upgrading to version 9.15.2.70 and 10.3.4.45 is able to resolve this issue. Upgrading the affected component is advised. The initial patch did not fix the security vulnerability properly. An update of the CVE entry to reflect this became necessary. |
| CVE-2026-105133 | Medium | 2026-10-04 | Not applicable | Exploited | A vulnerability was detected in Ahsay AhsayCBS up to 9.15.2.69/10.3.4.44. This affects the function checkSysPwd of the file com/ahsay/obs/api/ApiStructsAction.java of the component API. Performing a manipulation of the argument random results in improper authentication. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 9.15.2.70 and 10.3.4.45 is able to mitigate this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The initial patch did not fix the security vulnerability properly. An update of the CVE entry to reflect this became necessary. |
| CVE-2026-88772 | Critical | 2026-09-27 | Not applicable | Exploited | Vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23 leading to Remote Code Execution or Denial of Service |
| CVE-2026-88771 | Critical | 2026-09-27 | Not applicable | Exploited | Improper input validation vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23 leading to an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands. |
| CVE-2026-93616 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | A directory traversal and file upload vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload and execute arbitrary scripts on Check Point Management Server. |
| CVE-2026-87902 | High | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | An unauthenticated attacker can make `get_page_template()` page-template resolution include a chosen readable local `.php` file outside the active theme directories. If relevant pre-conditions for both the server and the active theme are met, this can lead to RCE. |
| CVE-2026-76460 | Critical | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | A vulnerability in an API of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication. This vulnerability is due to insufficient authentication control on an API endpoint. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected API endpoint. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain unauthorized access to the affected device by bypassing the web-based management interface. |
| CVE-2026-85706 | Critical | 2026-09-12 | Not applicable | Exploited | GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.7 before 18.11.12, 19.0 before 19.0.9, 19.1 before 19.1.8, 19.2 before 19.2.6, and 19.3 before 19.3.2 that, under certain conditions, an unauthenticated user could have read arbitrary files from the GitLab server due to improper path confinement and missing authentication enforcement in the repository commits API. |
| CVE-2026-85102 | Critical | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | Exploited | Improper certificate trust validation during VPN negotiation in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the Gateway. |
| CVE-2026-75650 | Critical | 2026-09-07 | Not applicable | Exploited | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-82078 | Critical | 2026-08-28 | Not applicable | Exploited | An unsafe dynamic class loading vulnerability exists in the database connection utilities of PaperCut MF and PaperCut NG. The application instantiates database driver classes based on configurable driver names without validating against an allowlist of approved drivers. If an attacker can manipulate system configuration parameters, this enables the execution of arbitrary Java bytecode residing on the application classpath under the security context of the PaperCut server process. |
| CVE-2026-81578 | High | 2026-08-28 | Not applicable | Exploited | An improper access control vulnerability exists in the web management interface of PaperCut MF and PaperCut NG. Under specific conditions, unauthenticated remote requests targeting administrative functions can trigger backend actions prior to the completion of access validation checks. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to modify certain system configurations. |
| CVE-2026-73570 | High | 2026-08-13 | Not applicable | Exploited | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.20 when the optional zimbra-snmp package is installed and SNMP notifications are enabled. Due to improper sanitization of untrusted input during SNMP notification processing, an unauthenticated attacker can send specially crafted SMTP requests that may result in execution of arbitrary operating system commands as the Zimbra user. |
| CVE-2026-71362 | Critical | 2026-08-11 | Not applicable | Exploited | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain elevated access to sensitive resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-72898 | Critical | 2026-08-10 | Not applicable | Exploited | Metabase allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to inject arbitrary SQL via the '/reset_password' database endpoint and gain administrator access to the connected Metabase instance. |
| CVE-2026-59310 | Critical | 2026-07-30 | Not applicable | Exploited | VMware vCenter contains a directory traversal vulnerability in the Syslog server. A malicious actor with network access to vCenter may exploit this issue to execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2026-63077 | Critical | 2026-07-27 | Not applicable | Exploited | In JetBrains TeamCity before 2026.1.3, 2025.11.7 unauthenticated remote code execution was possible via the agent polling protocol |
| CVE-2026-61511 | Critical | 2026-07-27 | Not applicable | Exploited | vBulletin 5.x through 5.7.5 and 6.x through 6.2.1 contains an eval injection vulnerability in the vB5_Template_Runtime::runMaths() method within the template runtime that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code by supplying crafted input through the pagenav[pagenumber] parameter. Attackers can exploit the insufficiently restrictive regex filter by using phpfuck-style encoding with permitted characters to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code via the unauthenticated ajax/render template route without any authentication. |
| CVE-2026-55040 | Critical | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | Exploited | Weak authentication in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. |
| CVE-2026-48908 | Critical | 2026-06-20 | Not applicable | Exploited | A vulnerability in SP Page Builder for Joomla allows unauthenticated users to upload arbitrary files, ultimately resulting in the upload and execution of PHP code. |
| CVE-2026-48558 | Critical | 2026-06-12 | Not applicable | Exploited | SimpleHelp versions 5.5.15 and prior and 6.0 pre-release versions contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the OIDC authentication flow. When OIDC authentication is configured, identity tokens submitted during login are accepted without verifying their cryptographic signature. In a vulnerable configuration, a remote, unauthenticated attacker can submit a forged token containing arbitrary identity claims to obtain a fully authenticated technician session. In some configurations, this may also allow bypass of multi-factor authentication. No user interaction is required. |
| CVE-2026-20253 | Critical | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | Exploited | In Splunk Enterprise 10.2 versions below 10.2.4 and 10 versions below 10.0.7, an unauthenticated user could create or truncate arbitrary files through a PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint. The vulnerability exists because the PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint lacks authentication controls, allowing any network-reachable user to invoke file operations without credentials. Splunk Enterprise versions 9.4 and earlier are not affected. If you cannot immediately upgrade to a fixed version, you can mitigate this vulnerability by disabling the PostgreSQL sidecar service. |
| CVE-2026-49160 | High | 2026-06-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Uncontrolled resource consumption in HTTP/2 allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. |
| CVE-2026-25089 | Critical | 2026-06-09 | Not applicable | Exploited | A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests |
| CVE-2026-10523 | Critical | 2026-06-09 | Not applicable | Forecast only | An Authentication Bypass vulnerability (CWE-288) in Ivanti Sentry before the R10.5.2, R10.6.2 and R10.7.1 versions allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to create arbitrary administrative accounts and obtain full administrative access |
| CVE-2026-10520 | Critical | 2026-06-09 | Not applicable | Exploited | An OS Command Injection vulnerability in Ivanti Sentry before the R10.5.2, R10.6.2 and R10.7.1 versions allows a remote unauthenticated user to achieve root-level remote code execution |
| CVE-2026-50751 | Critical | 2026-06-08 | Not applicable | Exploited | A logic flow weakness in Remote Access and Mobile Access certificate validation in deprecated IKEv1 key exchange allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass user authentication and establish a remote access VPN connection without a valid user password. |
| CVE-2026-48907 | Critical | 2026-06-05 | Not applicable | Exploited | A vulnerability in the JCE editor extension for Joomla allows the creation of new editor profiles for unauthenticated users, ultimately resulting in PHP code upload and execution. |
| CVE-2026-8037 | Critical | 2026-06-04 | Not applicable | Exploited | OS Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in API in Progress ADC Products allows an un-authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the LoadMaster appliance by exploiting unsanitized input in multiple command endpoints |
| CVE-2026-20230 | High | 2026-06-03 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to write files to the underlying operating system that could be used later to elevate to root. Note: Cisco has assigned this security advisory a Security Impact Rating (SIR) of Critical rather than High as the score indicates. The reason is that exploitation of this vulnerability could result in an attacker elevating privileges to root. Note: To exploit this vulnerability, the WebDialer service must be enabled. WebDialer is disabled by default. |
| CVE-2026-48710 | Medium | 2026-05-26 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP `Host` request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct `request.url`. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while `request.url` is rebuilt from the `Host` header, a malformed header could make `request.url.path` differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on `request.url` (rather than the raw `scope` path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the `Host` header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing `request.url` and falls back to `scope["server"]` for malformed values. |
| CVE-2026-45659 | High | 2026-05-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| CVE-2026-34910 | Critical | 2026-05-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi OS devices to execute a Command Injection. |
| CVE-2026-34909 | Critical | 2026-05-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit a Path Traversal vulnerability found in UniFi OS devices to access files on the underlying system that could be manipulated to access an underlying account. |
| CVE-2026-34908 | Critical | 2026-05-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit an Improper Access Control vulnerability found in UniFi OS devices to make unauthorized changes to the system. |
| CVE-2026-9082 | Critical | 2026-05-20 | Not applicable | Exploited | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Drupal Drupal core allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Drupal core: from 8.9.0 before 10.4.10, from 10.5.0 before 10.5.10, from 10.6.0 before 10.6.9, from 11.0.0 before 11.1.10, from 11.2.0 before 11.2.12, from 11.3.0 before 11.3.10. |
| CVE-2026-45498 | High | 2026-05-20 | Not applicable | Exploited | Microsoft Defender Denial of Service Vulnerability |
| CVE-2026-42897 | High | 2026-05-14 | Not applicable | Exploited | Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. |
| CVE-2026-20182 | Critical | 2026-05-14 | Not applicable | Exploited | May 2026: This security advisory provides the details and fix information for a vulnerability that was discovered and fixed after the was disclosed in February 2026. This new advisory is for a new vulnerability in the control connection handshaking. The section of this advisory includes Show Control Connections guidance to help with system checks. A vulnerability in the peering authentication in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller, formerly SD-WAN vSmart, Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly SD-WAN vManage, and Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Validator, formerly SD-WAN vBond, could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and obtain administrative privileges on an affected system. This vulnerability exists because the peering authentication mechanism in an affected system is not working properly. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted requests to the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to log in to an affected Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller as an internal, high-privileged, non-root user account. Using this account, the attacker could access NETCONF, which would then allow the attacker to manipulate network configuration for the SD-WAN fabric. |
| CVE-2026-42945 | Critical | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | Exploited | NGINX Plus and NGINX Open Source have a vulnerability in the ngx_http_rewrite_module module. This vulnerability exists when the rewrite directive is followed by a rewrite, if, or set directive and an unnamed Perl-Compatible Regular Expression (PCRE) capture (for example, $1, $2) with a replacement string that includes a question mark (?). An unauthenticated attacker along with conditions beyond its control can exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests. This may cause a heap buffer overflow in the NGINX worker process leading to a restart. Additionally, attackers can execute code on systems with Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) disabled or when the attacker can bypass ASLR. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-0257 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | Exploited | Authentication bypass vulnerabilities in the GlobalProtect portal and gateway of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software allows the attacker to bypass security restrictions and establish an unauthorized VPN connection. Panorama and Cloud NGFW are not impacted by these issues. |
| CVE-2026-41089 | Critical | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | Exploited | Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Netlogon allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| CVE-2026-43500 | High | 2026-05-11 | Not applicable | Exploited | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present The DATA-packet handler in rxrpc_input_call_event() and the RESPONSE handler in rxrpc_verify_response() copy the skb to a linear one before calling into the security ops only when skb_cloned() is true. An skb that is not cloned but still carries externally-owned paged fragments (e.g. SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG set by splice() into a UDP socket via __ip_append_data, or a chained skb_has_frag_list()) falls through to the in-place decryption path, which binds the frag pages directly into the AEAD/skcipher SGL via skb_to_sgvec(). Extend the gate to also unshare when skb_has_frag_list() or skb_has_shared_frag() is true. This catches the splice-loopback vector and other externally-shared frag sources while preserving the zero-copy fast path for skbs whose frags are kernel-private (e.g. NIC page_pool RX, GRO). The OOM/trace handling already in place is reused. |
| CVE-2026-43284 | High | 2026-05-08 | Not applicable | Exploited | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: esp: avoid in-place decrypt on shared skb frags MSG_SPLICE_PAGES can attach pages from a pipe directly to an skb. TCP marks such skbs with SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG after skb_splice_from_iter(), so later paths that may modify packet data can first make a private copy. The IPv4/IPv6 datagram append paths did not set this flag when splicing pages into UDP skbs. That leaves an ESP-in-UDP packet made from shared pipe pages looking like an ordinary uncloned nonlinear skb. ESP input then takes the no-COW fast path for uncloned skbs without a frag_list and decrypts in place over data that is not owned privately by the skb. Mark IPv4/IPv6 datagram splice frags with SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG, matching TCP. Also make ESP input fall back to skb_cow_data() when the flag is present, so ESP does not decrypt externally backed frags in place. Private nonlinear skb frags still use the existing fast path. This intentionally does not change ESP output. In esp_output_head(), the path that appends the ESP trailer to existing skb tailroom without calling skb_cow_data() is not reachable for nonlinear skbs: skb_tailroom() returns zero when skb->data_len is nonzero, while ESP tailen is positive. Thus ESP output will either use the separate destination-frag path or fall back to skb_cow_data(). |
| CVE-2026-42271 | High | 2026-05-08 | Not applicable | Exploited | LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. From version 1.74.2 to before version 1.83.7, two endpoints used to preview an MCP server before saving it — POST /mcp-rest/test/connection and POST /mcp-rest/test/tools/list — accepted a full server configuration in the request body, including the command, args, and env fields used by the stdio transport. When called with a stdio configuration, the endpoints attempted to connect, which spawned the supplied command as a subprocess on the proxy host with the privileges of the proxy process. The endpoints were gated only by a valid proxy API key, with no role check. Any authenticated user — including holders of low-privilege internal-user keys — could therefore run arbitrary commands on the host. This issue has been patched in version 1.83.7. |
| CVE-2026-42208 | Critical | 2026-05-08 | Not applicable | Exploited | LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. From version 1.81.16 to before version 1.83.7, a database query used during proxy API key checks mixed the caller-supplied key value into the query text instead of passing it as a separate parameter. An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted Authorization header to any LLM API route (for example POST /chat/completions) and reach this query through the proxy's error-handling path. An attacker could read data from the proxy's database and may be able to modify it, leading to unauthorised access to the proxy and the credentials it manages. This issue has been patched in version 1.83.7. |
| CVE-2026-41940 | Critical | 2026-04-29 | Not applicable | Exploited | cPanel and WHM versions after 11.40 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the login flow that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to gain unauthorized access to the control panel. |
| CVE-2026-31431 | High | 2026-04-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly. |
| CVE-2026-39808 | Critical | 2026-04-14 | Not applicable | Exploited | A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here> |
| CVE-2026-33824 | Critical | 2026-04-14 | Not applicable | Exploited | Double free in Windows IKE Extension allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| CVE-2026-32202 | Medium | 2026-04-14 | Not applicable | Exploited | Protection mechanism failure in Windows Shell allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. |
| CVE-2026-39987 | Critical | 2026-04-09 | Not applicable | Exploited | marimo is a reactive Python notebook. Prior to 0.23.0, Marimo has a Pre-Auth RCE vulnerability. The terminal WebSocket endpoint /terminal/ws lacks authentication validation, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to obtain a full PTY shell and execute arbitrary system commands. Unlike other WebSocket endpoints (e.g., /ws) that correctly call validate_auth() for authentication, the /terminal/ws endpoint only checks the running mode and platform support before accepting connections, completely skipping authentication verification. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.23.0. |
| CVE-2026-0740 | Critical | 2026-04-07 | Not applicable | Exploited | The Ninja Forms - File Uploads plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the 'NF_FU_AJAX_Controllers_Uploads::handle_upload' function in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.26. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Note: The vulnerability was partially patched in version 3.3.25 and fully patched in version 3.3.27. |
| CVE-2026-35616 | Critical | 2026-04-04 | Not applicable | Exploited | A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.5 through 7.4.6 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests. |
| CVE-2026-2701 | Critical | 2026-04-02 | Not applicable | Forecast only | Authenticated user can upload a malicious file to the server and execute it, which leads to remote code execution. |
| CVE-2026-2699 | Critical | 2026-04-02 | Not applicable | Exploited | Customer Managed ShareFile Storage Zones Controller (SZC) allows an unauthenticated attacker to access restricted configuration pages. This leads to changing system configuration and potential remote code execution. |
| CVE-2026-4020 | High | 2026-03-31 | Not applicable | Exploited | The Gravity SMTP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.4. This is due to a REST API endpoint registered at /wp-json/gravitysmtp/v1/tests/mock-data with a permission_callback that unconditionally returns true, allowing any unauthenticated visitor to access it. When the ?page=gravitysmtp-settings query parameter is appended, the plugin's register_connector_data() method populates internal connector data, causing the endpoint to return approximately 365 KB of JSON containing the full System Report. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve detailed system configuration data including PHP version, loaded extensions, web server version, document root path, database server type and version, WordPress version, all active plugins with versions, active theme, WordPress configuration details, database table names, and any API keys/tokens configured in the plugin. |
| CVE-2026-33634 | Critical | 2026-03-23 | Not applicable | Exploited | Trivy is a security scanner. On March 19, 2026, a threat actor used compromised credentials to publish a malicious Trivy v0.69.4 release, force-push 76 of 77 version tags in `aquasecurity/trivy-action` to credential-stealing malware, and replace all 7 tags in `aquasecurity/setup-trivy` with malicious commits. This incident is a continuation of the supply chain attack that began in late February 2026. Following the initial disclosure on March 1, credential rotation was performed but was not atomic (not all credentials were revoked simultaneously). The attacker could have use a valid token to exfiltrate newly rotated secrets during the rotation window (which lasted a few days). This could have allowed the attacker to retain access and execute the March 19 attack. Affected components include the `aquasecurity/trivy` Go / Container image version 0.69.4, the `aquasecurity/trivy-action` GitHub Action versions 0.0.1 – 0.34.2 (76/77), and the`aquasecurity/setup-trivy` GitHub Action versions 0.2.0 – 0.2.6, prior to the recreation of 0.2.6 with a safe commit. Known safe versions include versions 0.69.2 and 0.69.3 of the Trivy binary, version 0.35.0 of trivy-action, and version 0.2.6 of setup-trivy. Additionally, take other mitigations to ensure the safety of secrets. If there is any possibility that a compromised version ran in one's environment, all secrets accessible to affected pipelines must be treated as exposed and rotated immediately. Check whether one's organization pulled or executed Trivy v0.69.4 from any source. Remove any affected artifacts immediately. Review all workflows using `aquasecurity/trivy-action` or `aquasecurity/setup-trivy`. Those who referenced a version tag rather than a full commit SHA should check workflow run logs from March 19–20, 2026 for signs of compromise. Look for repositories named `tpcp-docs` in one's GitHub organization. The presence of such a repository may indicate that the fallback exfiltration mechanism was triggered and secrets were successfully stolen. Pin GitHub Actions to full, immutable commit SHA hashes, don't use mutable version tags. |
| CVE-2026-3055 | Critical | 2026-03-23 | Not applicable | Exploited | Insufficient input validation in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway when configured as a SAML IDP leading to memory overread |
| CVE-2026-33017 | Critical | 2026-03-20 | Not applicable | Exploited | Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. In versions prior to 1.9.0, the POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow endpoint allows building public flows without requiring authentication. When the optional data parameter is supplied, the endpoint uses attacker-controlled flow data (containing arbitrary Python code in node definitions) instead of the stored flow data from the database. This code is passed to exec() with zero sandboxing, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution. This is distinct from CVE-2025-3248, which fixed /api/v1/validate/code by adding authentication. The build_public_tmp endpoint is designed to be unauthenticated (for public flows) but incorrectly accepts attacker-supplied flow data containing arbitrary executable code. This issue has been fixed in version 1.9.0. |
| CVE-2026-20079 | Critical | 2026-03-04 | Not applicable | Exploited | A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and execute script files on an affected device to obtain root access to the underlying operating system. This vulnerability is due to an improper system process that is created at boot time. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute a variety of scripts and commands that allow root access to the device. |
| CVE-2026-20127 | Critical | 2026-02-25 | Not applicable | Exploited | A vulnerability in the peering authentication in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller, formerly SD-WAN vSmart, Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly SD-WAN vManage, and Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Validator, formerly SD-WAN vBond, could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and obtain administrative privileges on an affected system. This vulnerability exists because the peering authentication mechanism in an affected system is not working properly. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted requests to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to log in to an affected Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller as an internal, high-privileged, non-root user account. Using this account, the attacker could access NETCONF, which would then allow the attacker to manipulate network configuration for the SD-WAN fabric. |
| CVE-2026-26980 | Critical | 2026-02-20 | Not applicable | Exploited | Ghost is a Node.js content management system. Versions 3.24.0 through 6.19.0 allow unauthenticated attackers to perform arbitrary reads from the database. This issue has been fixed in version 6.19.1. |
| CVE-2026-2043 | High | 2026-02-20 | Not applicable | Forecast only | Nagios Host esensors_websensor_configwizard_func Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Nagios Host. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the esensors_websensor_configwizard_func method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-28249. |
| CVE-2026-2041 | High | 2026-02-20 | Not applicable | Forecast only | Nagios Host zabbixagent_configwizard_func Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Nagios Host. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the zabbixagent_configwizard_func method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-28250. |
| CVE-2026-2441 | High | 2026-02-13 | Not applicable | Exploited | Use after free in CSS in Google Chrome prior to 145.0.7632.75 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| CVE-2026-21510 | High | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | Exploited | Protection mechanism failure in Windows Shell allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. |
| CVE-2026-1603 | High | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | Exploited | An authentication bypass in Ivanti Endpoint Manager before version 2024 SU5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to leak specific stored credential data. |
| CVE-2026-21643 | Critical | 2026-02-06 | Not applicable | Exploited | An improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.4 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests. |
| CVE-2026-1731 | Critical | 2026-02-06 | Not applicable | Exploited | BeyondTrust Remote Support (RS) and certain older versions of Privileged Remote Access (PRA) contain a critical pre-authentication remote code execution vulnerability. By sending specially crafted requests, an unauthenticated remote attacker may be able to execute operating system commands in the context of the site user. |
| CVE-2026-1340 | Critical | 2026-01-29 | Not applicable | Exploited | A code injection in Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile allowing attackers to achieve unauthenticated remote code execution. |
| CVE-2026-1281 | Critical | 2026-01-29 | Not applicable | Exploited | A code injection in Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile allowing attackers to achieve unauthenticated remote code execution. |
| CVE-2025-40554 | Critical | 2026-01-28 | Not applicable | Exploited | SolarWinds Web Help Desk was found to be susceptible to an authentication bypass vulnerability that, if exploited, could allow an attacker to invoke specific actions within Web Help Desk. |
| CVE-2025-40553 | Critical | 2026-01-28 | Not applicable | Exploited | SolarWinds Web Help Desk was found to be susceptible to an untrusted data deserialization vulnerability that could lead to remote code execution, which would allow an attacker to run commands on the host machine. This could be exploited without authentication. |
| CVE-2025-40552 | Critical | 2026-01-28 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | SolarWinds Web Help Desk was found to be susceptible to an authentication bypass vulnerability that if exploited, would allow a malicious actor to execute actions and methods that should be protected by authentication. |
| CVE-2025-40551 | Critical | 2026-01-28 | Not applicable | Exploited | SolarWinds Web Help Desk was found to be susceptible to an untrusted data deserialization vulnerability that could lead to remote code execution, which would allow an attacker to run commands on the host machine. This could be exploited without authentication. |
| CVE-2025-40536 | Critical | 2026-01-28 | Not applicable | Exploited | SolarWinds Web Help Desk was found to be susceptible to a security control bypass vulnerability that if exploited, could allow an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to certain restricted functionality. |
| CVE-2026-24858 | Critical | 2026-01-27 | Not applicable | Exploited | An Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability [CWE-288] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.0.0 through 7.0.15, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.15, FortiNAC-F 7.6.3 through 7.6.5, FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.10, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiOS 7.0.0 through 7.0.18, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.12, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.2.15, FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.22, FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.11 may allow an attacker with a FortiCloud account and a registered device to log into other devices registered to other accounts, if FortiCloud SSO authentication is enabled on those devices. |
| CVE-2025-15467 | Critical | 2026-01-27 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Issue summary: Parsing CMS AuthEnvelopedData or EnvelopedData message with maliciously crafted AEAD parameters can trigger a stack buffer overflow. Impact summary: A stack buffer overflow may lead to a crash, causing Denial of Service, or potentially remote code execution. When parsing CMS (Auth)EnvelopedData structures that use AEAD ciphers such as AES-GCM, the IV (Initialization Vector) encoded in the ASN.1 parameters is copied into a fixed-size stack buffer without verifying that its length fits the destination. An attacker can supply a crafted CMS message with an oversized IV, causing a stack-based out-of-bounds write before any authentication or tag verification occurs. Applications and services that parse untrusted CMS or PKCS#7 content using AEAD ciphers (e.g., S/MIME (Auth)EnvelopedData with AES-GCM) are vulnerable. Because the overflow occurs prior to authentication, no valid key material is required to trigger it. While exploitability to remote code execution depends on platform and toolchain mitigations, the stack-based write primitive represents a severe risk. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue. |
| CVE-2026-21509 | High | 2026-01-26 | Not applicable | Exploited | Reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally. |
| CVE-2026-24423 | Critical | 2026-01-23 | Not applicable | Exploited | SmarterTools SmarterMail versions prior to build 9511 contain an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the ConnectToHub API method. The attacker could point the SmarterMail to the malicious HTTP server, which serves the malicious OS command. This command will be executed by the vulnerable application. |
| CVE-2026-0770 | Critical | 2026-01-23 | Not applicable | Exploited | Langflow exec_globals Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Langflow. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the exec_globals parameter provided to the validate endpoint. The issue results from the inclusion of a resource from an untrusted control sphere. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-27325. |
| CVE-2026-23760 | Critical | 2026-01-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | SmarterTools SmarterMail versions prior to build 9511 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the password reset API. The force-reset-password endpoint permits anonymous requests and fails to verify the existing password or a reset token when resetting system administrator accounts. An unauthenticated attacker can supply a target administrator username and a new password to reset the account, resulting in full administrative compromise of the SmarterMail instance. NOTE: SmarterMail system administrator privileges grant the ability to execute operating system commands via built-in management functionality, effectively providing administrative (SYSTEM or root) access on the underlying host. |
| CVE-2026-24061 | Critical | 2026-01-21 | Not applicable | Exploited | telnetd in GNU Inetutils through 2.7 allows remote authentication bypass via a "-f root" value for the USER environment variable. |
| CVE-2026-21962 | Critical | 2026-01-20 | Not applicable | Exploited | Vulnerability in the Oracle HTTP Server, Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-in product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-in for Apache HTTP Server, Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-in for IIS). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0, 14.1.1.0.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle HTTP Server, Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-in. While the vulnerability is in Oracle HTTP Server, Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-in, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle HTTP Server, Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-in accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle HTTP Server, Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-in accessible data. Note: Affected version for Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-in for IIS is 12.2.1.4.0 only. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 10.0 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-23744 | Critical | 2026-01-16 | Not applicable | Exploited | MCPJam inspector is the local-first development platform for MCP servers. Versions 1.4.2 and earlier are vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability, which allows an attacker to send a crafted HTTP request that triggers the installation of an MCP server, leading to RCE. Since MCPJam inspector by default listens on 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1, an attacker can trigger the RCE remotely via a simple HTTP request. Version 1.4.3 contains a patch. |
| CVE-2025-60021 | Critical | 2026-01-16 | Not applicable | Exploited | Remote command injection vulnerability in heap profiler builtin service in Apache bRPC ((all versions < 1.15.0)) on all platforms allows attacker to inject remote command. Root Cause: The bRPC heap profiler built-in service (/pprof/heap) does not validate the user-provided extra_options parameter and executes it as a command-line argument. Attackers can execute remote commands using the extra_options parameter.. Affected scenarios: Use the built-in bRPC heap profiler service to perform jemalloc memory profiling. How to Fix: we provide two methods, you can choose one of them: 1. Upgrade bRPC to version 1.15.0. 2. Apply this patch ( https://github.com/apache/brpc/pull/3101 ) manually. |
| CVE-2026-22200 | High | 2026-01-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Enhancesoft osTicket versions 1.18.x prior to 1.18.3 and 1.17.x prior to 1.17.7 contain an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the ticket PDF export functionality. A remote attacker can submit a ticket containing crafted rich-text HTML that includes PHP filter expressions which are insufficiently sanitized before being processed by the mPDF PDF generator during export. When the attacker exports the ticket to PDF, the generated PDF can embed the contents of attacker-selected files from the server filesystem as bitmap images, allowing disclosure of sensitive local files in the context of the osTicket application user. This issue is exploitable in default configurations where guests may create tickets and access ticket status, or where self-registration is enabled. |
| CVE-2025-12420 | Critical | 2026-01-12 | Not applicable | Forecast only | A vulnerability has been identified in the ServiceNow AI Platform that could enable an unauthenticated user to impersonate another user and perform the operations that the impersonated user is entitled to perform. ServiceNow has addressed this vulnerability by deploying a relevant security update to hosted instances in October 2025. Security updates have also been provided to ServiceNow self-hosted customers, partners, and hosted customers with unique configurations. Additionally, the vulnerability is addressed in the listed Store App versions. We recommend that customers promptly apply an appropriate security update or upgrade if they have not already done so. |
| CVE-2026-21858 | Critical | 2026-01-08 | Not applicable | Exploited | n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Versions starting with 1.65.0 and below 1.121.0 enable an attacker to access files on the underlying server through execution of certain form-based workflows. A vulnerable workflow could grant access to an unauthenticated remote attacker, resulting in exposure of sensitive information stored on the system and may enable further compromise depending on deployment configuration and workflow usage. This issue is fixed in version 1.121.0. |
| CVE-2025-52691 | Critical | 2025-12-29 | Not applicable | Exploited | Successful exploitation of the vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary files to any location on the mail server, potentially enabling remote code execution. |
| CVE-2025-68645 | High | 2025-12-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | A Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability exists in the Webmail Classic UI of Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.0 and 10.1 because of improper handling of user-supplied request parameters in the RestFilter servlet. An unauthenticated remote attacker can craft requests to the /h/rest endpoint to influence internal request dispatching, allowing inclusion of arbitrary files from the WebRoot directory. |