VRT 391,192 CVEs tracked · 15,442 in RASP scope · data as of 19 hours ago
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Oracle product: Oracle Fusion Middleware / Endeca Server (OpenSSL)
Overview 1 match · 0 in RASP scope · 0 protected · 0 KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 CISA SSVC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5 · 0 disputed
1match 0in RASP scope0.0% 0protected0.0% 0KEV0.0% 0public PoC0.0% 0CISA SSVC0.0% 0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0% 0disputed0.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 0 0.0% Medium 1 100.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
Protected by RASP 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0% No fix identified 0 0.0% Mitigated by environment configuration 0 0.0% Queued for review 0 0.0% Not applicable 1 100.0% Out of RASP scope 0 0.0% Rejected 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% not blocked 1 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited in the wild 0 0.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 1 100.0%
split by peak 1 / month
Unknown: 0None: 0Low: 0Medium: 1High: 0Critical: 0 Rejected: 0Out of RASP scope: 0Not applicable: 1Queued for review: 0Mitigated by environment configuration: 0No fix identified: 0No exploit published: 0Mitigation candidate: 0Rule in development: 0Protected by RASP: 0 unrecorded: 0not established: 0not blocked: 1blocked by ARMR today: 0 No public exploit: 1Forecast only: 0Proof of concept only: 0Working exploit published: 0Exploited in the wild: 0 November 2017: 1 CVE
Nov 17
1 match CSV JSON
CVE Severity Published Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2017-3736 Medium 2017-11-02 Not applicable No public exploit There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0g. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. This only affects processors that support the BMI1, BMI2 and ADX extensions like Intel Broadwell (5th generation) and later or AMD Ryzen.